<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cubs Won&#8217;t Win in 2009 Because They Have Too Many Short White Guys Who Aren&#8217;t Champions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/</link>
	<description>Chicago Cubs Rumors, News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Sterling Says the 2011 Cubs Are Doomed &#8211; And It&#8217;s Hard to Argue &#124; Bleacher Nation &#124; Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-12030</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Sterling Says the 2011 Cubs Are Doomed &#8211; And It&#8217;s Hard to Argue &#124; Bleacher Nation &#124; Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=463#comment-12030</guid>
		<description>[...] I took issue with Kent&#8217;s position &#8211; not necessarily whether the Cubs would win that year (I avoided that question, but if you&#8217;d asked me, I would have told you the Cubs would tear it up, and you would have laughed at me for using that tired expression), but because his reasons were laughably absurd. I subsequently beefed in Kent&#8217;s article&#8217;s comments, and he beefed in mine. Everyone had a grand &#8216;ole time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I took issue with Kent&#8217;s position &#8211; not necessarily whether the Cubs would win that year (I avoided that question, but if you&#8217;d asked me, I would have told you the Cubs would tear it up, and you would have laughed at me for using that tired expression), but because his reasons were laughably absurd. I subsequently beefed in Kent&#8217;s article&#8217;s comments, and he beefed in mine. Everyone had a grand &#8216;ole time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardfan</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-3953</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=463#comment-3953</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t resist on this one...

I would encourage you to retract your apology, Ace.  

As for you Kent, a diagnosis of narcissitic tendencies has never been easier given the timing and content of your brief post.  Would your ex-wives agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t resist on this one&#8230;</p>
<p>I would encourage you to retract your apology, Ace.  </p>
<p>As for you Kent, a diagnosis of narcissitic tendencies has never been easier given the timing and content of your brief post.  Would your ex-wives agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-3950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=463#comment-3950</guid>
		<description>Kent - I&#039;ll apologize for the harshness of my tone. It was unnecessary.

However, you can&#039;t be seriously claiming some kind of foresight here, can you?

Sure, the Cubs struggled and ended up somewhere in the broad range that you may have predicted.

But your reasons are just as bizarre and incorrect now as they were when you made them.

The Cubs won&#039;t win because they re-signed Michael Wuertz? A middle reliever, whom the Cubs ultimately traded and who actually was great in Oakland, was the reason the Cubs won&#039;t win? Yikes. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d be patting myself on the back after that one.

The Cubs won&#039;t win because of Ronny Cedeno? A bench, utility player, whom the Cubs ultimately traded. Again, guh?

The Cubs won&#039;t win because they have too many short, white guys? Do I really have to respond to that one?

I appreciated you coming back to this subject, and thanks for your comment, but your self-adulation on this one is misplaced at best. Good luck prognosticating next year - I look forward to reviewing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent &#8211; I&#8217;ll apologize for the harshness of my tone. It was unnecessary.</p>
<p>However, you can&#8217;t be seriously claiming some kind of foresight here, can you?</p>
<p>Sure, the Cubs struggled and ended up somewhere in the broad range that you may have predicted.</p>
<p>But your reasons are just as bizarre and incorrect now as they were when you made them.</p>
<p>The Cubs won&#8217;t win because they re-signed Michael Wuertz? A middle reliever, whom the Cubs ultimately traded and who actually was great in Oakland, was the reason the Cubs won&#8217;t win? Yikes. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be patting myself on the back after that one.</p>
<p>The Cubs won&#8217;t win because of Ronny Cedeno? A bench, utility player, whom the Cubs ultimately traded. Again, guh?</p>
<p>The Cubs won&#8217;t win because they have too many short, white guys? Do I really have to respond to that one?</p>
<p>I appreciated you coming back to this subject, and thanks for your comment, but your self-adulation on this one is misplaced at best. Good luck prognosticating next year &#8211; I look forward to reviewing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Sterling</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Sterling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=463#comment-3948</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for an apology.  Ubergenius is a little strong, but I predicted before the beginning of the season the Cubs would win 83 games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for an apology.  Ubergenius is a little strong, but I predicted before the beginning of the season the Cubs would win 83 games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wv23</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/02/03/the-cubs-wont-win-in-2009-because-they-have-too-many-short-white-guys-who-arent-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>wv23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=463#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see...

1. Mark Belanger was 6-1, 170.

2. Soriano, Dempster, Lee, Cotts all have WS rings. Don&#039;t think I&#039;m missing others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Mark Belanger was 6-1, 170.</p>
<p>2. Soriano, Dempster, Lee, Cotts all have WS rings. Don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m missing others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

