<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obsessive Bradley Trade Watch: Folks Are Getting a Little Bit Crazy About This Potential Bradley/Burrell Swap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/13/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-folks-are-getting-a-little-bit-crazy-about-this-potential-bradleyburrell-swap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/13/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-folks-are-getting-a-little-bit-crazy-about-this-potential-bradleyburrell-swap/</link>
	<description>Chicago Cubs Rumors, News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:24:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/13/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-folks-are-getting-a-little-bit-crazy-about-this-potential-bradleyburrell-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-3920</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3962#comment-3920</guid>
		<description>Totally agree that the move will be painful - I just wanted to point out why the Cubs eating $13 million didn&#039;t make sense to me. And you&#039;re right: if the Cubs did eat the entire difference between Bradley&#039;s and Burrell&#039;s deals, it would be a no brainer for the Rays. Of course, deals that are a no brainer on one side tend to be good-God-what-are-you-thinking on the other side.

And I would also like to point out that, to your credit, I referred to RaysIndex as a &quot;reputable source.&quot; That&#039;s gotta get me something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree that the move will be painful &#8211; I just wanted to point out why the Cubs eating $13 million didn&#8217;t make sense to me. And you&#8217;re right: if the Cubs did eat the entire difference between Bradley&#8217;s and Burrell&#8217;s deals, it would be a no brainer for the Rays. Of course, deals that are a no brainer on one side tend to be good-God-what-are-you-thinking on the other side.</p>
<p>And I would also like to point out that, to your credit, I referred to RaysIndex as a &#8220;reputable source.&#8221; That&#8217;s gotta get me something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cork Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/13/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-folks-are-getting-a-little-bit-crazy-about-this-potential-bradleyburrell-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-3918</link>
		<dc:creator>Cork Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3962#comment-3918</guid>
		<description>Well, in defense of RaysIndex.com, we only said the deal was a no brainer from the Rays perspective and for the same reasons you mention above. But we also mention that the deal doesn&#039;t make much sense from the Cubs point of view. 

That being said, the Cubs have put themselves in a corner by suspending Bradley and basically making it impossible for him to come back. Whatever deal the Cubs work out, it ain&#039;t going to be pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in defense of RaysIndex.com, we only said the deal was a no brainer from the Rays perspective and for the same reasons you mention above. But we also mention that the deal doesn&#8217;t make much sense from the Cubs point of view. </p>
<p>That being said, the Cubs have put themselves in a corner by suspending Bradley and basically making it impossible for him to come back. Whatever deal the Cubs work out, it ain&#8217;t going to be pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

