<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obsessive Bradley Trade Watch: The Giants Would Trade Aaron Rowand for Bradley Straight Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/</link>
	<description>Chicago Cubs Rumors, News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Qualified To Comment &#187; Qualified Links</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Qualified To Comment &#187; Qualified Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3984#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>[...] Apparently some official within th eGiants organization claims they would trade Rowand for Bradley &#8220;straight up&#8221;.  Rowand&#8217;s contract is way worse and has another year on it, but still you have to think the Cubs should do it. [Bleacher Nation] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apparently some official within th eGiants organization claims they would trade Rowand for Bradley &#8220;straight up&#8221;.  Rowand&#8217;s contract is way worse and has another year on it, but still you have to think the Cubs should do it. [Bleacher Nation] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xolager</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>xolager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3984#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>No doubt about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3984#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with your math there, but I like where your head is at.

HOWEVA

Bradley is the far superior player. Doesn&#039;t that have to factor in there somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with your math there, but I like where your head is at.</p>
<p>HOWEVA</p>
<p>Bradley is the far superior player. Doesn&#8217;t that have to factor in there somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xolager</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3929</link>
		<dc:creator>xolager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3984#comment-3929</guid>
		<description>I love these &quot;obsessive watches&quot;.  :-)

Rowand + $36M = Bradley + Baggage + $21M
-(Bradley + Baggage) = -$21M
Rowand + $36M = $42M
Rowand = $6M

Trading Rowand for Bradley saves you $6M as opposed to dropping Bradley outright.  I guess the question is could the Cubs get a player as good as Rowand for $6M over three years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these &#8220;obsessive watches&#8221;.  <img src='http://www.bleachernation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rowand + $36M = Bradley + Baggage + $21M<br />
-(Bradley + Baggage) = -$21M<br />
Rowand + $36M = $42M<br />
Rowand = $6M</p>
<p>Trading Rowand for Bradley saves you $6M as opposed to dropping Bradley outright.  I guess the question is could the Cubs get a player as good as Rowand for $6M over three years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/10/14/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-the-giants-would-trade-aaron-rowand-for-bradley-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=3984#comment-3928</guid>
		<description>Do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

