<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obsessive Bradley Trade Watch: Eric Byrnes is Popping Up Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/</link>
	<description>Chicago Cubs Rumors, News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4211#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>Platoon partner I could maybe get on board with, assuming the Cubs absorbed no money of Bradley&#039;s deal, and assuming the Cubs then actually get Granderson. Can Byrnes still play CF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Platoon partner I could maybe get on board with, assuming the Cubs absorbed no money of Bradley&#8217;s deal, and assuming the Cubs then actually get Granderson. Can Byrnes still play CF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4211#comment-4190</guid>
		<description>If it were that simple, then the D-Backs wouldn&#039;t want to do that deal. They&#039;d just release Byrnes, themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were that simple, then the D-Backs wouldn&#8217;t want to do that deal. They&#8217;d just release Byrnes, themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4211#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>If they could trade Milton for this guy and take no money on Milton&#039;s contract, do it. Then release him. Or trade for a player to be named later if anyone takes him. But it would be cheaper to just release him than it would Milton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they could trade Milton for this guy and take no money on Milton&#8217;s contract, do it. Then release him. Or trade for a player to be named later if anyone takes him. But it would be cheaper to just release him than it would Milton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarey</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/11/17/obsessive-bradley-trade-watch-eric-byrnes-is-popping-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4211#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>I really wouldn&#039;t mind this swap for two reasons.

1. This would free up some financial responsibility for 2011.
2. The Cubs could probably squeeze a decent prospect out of the swap as well.

The Cubs would basically have a very expensive and slightly less productive Reed Johnson. In fact, he wouldn&#039;t be a bad platoon partner to pair with Granderson if the Cubs somehow swing a deal for him. It would just be the most expensive platoon ever in terms of production per dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wouldn&#8217;t mind this swap for two reasons.</p>
<p>1. This would free up some financial responsibility for 2011.<br />
2. The Cubs could probably squeeze a decent prospect out of the swap as well.</p>
<p>The Cubs would basically have a very expensive and slightly less productive Reed Johnson. In fact, he wouldn&#8217;t be a bad platoon partner to pair with Granderson if the Cubs somehow swing a deal for him. It would just be the most expensive platoon ever in terms of production per dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

