<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Case You Were Worried the Wrigley Field Name Was in Danger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/</link>
	<description>Chicago Cubs Rumors, News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:20:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5356</guid>
		<description>In an ideal world, Bob. But unfortunately, something tells me chewing gum isn&#039;t quite the monolith that it would take to pay for that kind of prime ad space.

Unless that chewing gum was Big League Chew. Remember that stuff? That was the shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an ideal world, Bob. But unfortunately, something tells me chewing gum isn&#8217;t quite the monolith that it would take to pay for that kind of prime ad space.</p>
<p>Unless that chewing gum was Big League Chew. Remember that stuff? That was the shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>Why not approach the Wrigley Company and make them the prime sponsor and pay naming rights, therefore keeping it Wrigley Field!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not approach the Wrigley Company and make them the prime sponsor and pay naming rights, therefore keeping it Wrigley Field!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lok</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5320</link>
		<dc:creator>Lok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5320</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m torn.  I&#039;ve been to Wrigley twice in my life time to see my beloved Cubbies play divisional rivals (Brewers and Cards).  I&#039;ve also seen the Cubs play at a (relatively) new/modern field twice (Citizen&#039;s Bank Park, Philly) where I used to live.  I enjoyed both fields equally and if I had a choice, I&#039;d much rather enjoy a game at Wrigley.  Sure, the fan support is there, but just the overall ambiance.  Knowing that the *our* greats have run the bases, hit the homers, pitched the shutouts, etc, makes it feel like mine.  

I personally have no issue what-so-ever with Ricket&#039;s selling the naming rights.  I would beg them to keep the name Wrigley (or rename it to something non-corporate like Friendly Confines presented By Budweiser, for example) and be attributed to the corporation.  Hopefully, selling the rights to a company that respects the Cubs and their history, would recognize the bond the fans have and would want to help keep that tie.  

Of course, in a perfect world, we&#039;d still have no lights on our field either (and yes, I still prefer my day games.  It&#039;s how I grew up watching Baseball, it&#039;s how Baseball is meant to be played....at Wrigley =D)

All that being said, I&#039;d love for a World Series before I die.  I&#039;ve supported the team since I was a young child as my dad taught me the correct Chicago team to support (and my bastard Uncle being a Sox fan didn&#039;t help!).  I just don&#039;t think I&#039;d want to sell my &quot;soul&quot; for a ring.  We&#039;ve waited 101 years as fans, what&#039;s a couple more?  Wrigley is our turf.  Whether Zambrano likes it or not, it&#039;s home.  Let&#039;s win a ring at home.  We can discuss moving later. 

=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn.  I&#8217;ve been to Wrigley twice in my life time to see my beloved Cubbies play divisional rivals (Brewers and Cards).  I&#8217;ve also seen the Cubs play at a (relatively) new/modern field twice (Citizen&#8217;s Bank Park, Philly) where I used to live.  I enjoyed both fields equally and if I had a choice, I&#8217;d much rather enjoy a game at Wrigley.  Sure, the fan support is there, but just the overall ambiance.  Knowing that the *our* greats have run the bases, hit the homers, pitched the shutouts, etc, makes it feel like mine.  </p>
<p>I personally have no issue what-so-ever with Ricket&#8217;s selling the naming rights.  I would beg them to keep the name Wrigley (or rename it to something non-corporate like Friendly Confines presented By Budweiser, for example) and be attributed to the corporation.  Hopefully, selling the rights to a company that respects the Cubs and their history, would recognize the bond the fans have and would want to help keep that tie.  </p>
<p>Of course, in a perfect world, we&#8217;d still have no lights on our field either (and yes, I still prefer my day games.  It&#8217;s how I grew up watching Baseball, it&#8217;s how Baseball is meant to be played&#8230;.at Wrigley =D)</p>
<p>All that being said, I&#8217;d love for a World Series before I die.  I&#8217;ve supported the team since I was a young child as my dad taught me the correct Chicago team to support (and my bastard Uncle being a Sox fan didn&#8217;t help!).  I just don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d want to sell my &#8220;soul&#8221; for a ring.  We&#8217;ve waited 101 years as fans, what&#8217;s a couple more?  Wrigley is our turf.  Whether Zambrano likes it or not, it&#8217;s home.  Let&#8217;s win a ring at home.  We can discuss moving later. </p>
<p>=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5319</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5319</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, I really thought I would have brought out some very angry people ( maybe they&#039;re busy today or something ( ha ). 

Yes, I&#039;m all for winning a World Series no matter where it was played. I&#039;d rather have it at Wrigley, but if it took more revenue from a new park, you wouldn&#039;t see me smiling any less because of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, I really thought I would have brought out some very angry people ( maybe they&#8217;re busy today or something ( ha ). </p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m all for winning a World Series no matter where it was played. I&#8217;d rather have it at Wrigley, but if it took more revenue from a new park, you wouldn&#8217;t see me smiling any less because of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrejr8234</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5317</link>
		<dc:creator>mrejr8234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5317</guid>
		<description>I dont care if they burn Wrigley to the ground or rename it whatever. I only care about a World Series title</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont care if they burn Wrigley to the ground or rename it whatever. I only care about a World Series title</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savant</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>savant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Joe.  Although my first attempt at selling the naming rights would be to get Wrigley to go ahead and start paying up for all of the free exposure they have received since the Cubs were sold to Tribco.  If Wrigley has no interest in paying in the future, then by all means find another company name to put on the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Joe.  Although my first attempt at selling the naming rights would be to get Wrigley to go ahead and start paying up for all of the free exposure they have received since the Cubs were sold to Tribco.  If Wrigley has no interest in paying in the future, then by all means find another company name to put on the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5308</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually a very interesting discussion, Joe: would you rather the Cubs won the World Series at a new-fangled, differently-named ballpark; or would you rather they stayed at Wrigley Field?

To me (and you), if those are the only options, the answer is obvious: WORLD SERIES. But to many others, it&#039;s a much closer question.

Fortunately, it&#039;s not an either-or situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually a very interesting discussion, Joe: would you rather the Cubs won the World Series at a new-fangled, differently-named ballpark; or would you rather they stayed at Wrigley Field?</p>
<p>To me (and you), if those are the only options, the answer is obvious: WORLD SERIES. But to many others, it&#8217;s a much closer question.</p>
<p>Fortunately, it&#8217;s not an either-or situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/01/09/in-case-you-were-worried-the-wrigley-field-name-was-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-5307</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleachernation.com/?p=4582#comment-5307</guid>
		<description>It seems like there are an awful lot of alleged Cubs fans that care more about having the Cubs play in Wrigley ( and by God, it had BETTER be called that ) than they care about the Cubs winning.

Yeah, I know I&#039;m going to be a pariah here, but can those of you that I referred to above just remove the Cubs ear plugs from your ears and listen for a minute?

If the Ricketts&#039; would sell naming rights and would be able to make the field now known as Wrigley a more fan friendly and team friendly place ( Cubs only, of course ), wouldn&#039;t that be worth selling naming rights? I mean, and lets all think about this, is the name of the place going to change your experience at the game? You&#039;re still going to go to the game, watch the Cubs win (hopefully) and have a good time (whatever that is for each individual). 

It won&#039;t make the Cubs suck or ruin your day. Maybe, it would even make Wrigley a nicer place to watch a game. It won&#039;t change what any of us call it anyway. 

People still call that park on the South Side what it was called before. Sure, some people call it by it&#039;s new name, but overall, those other fans still call it or think of it by it&#039;s previous name ( granted those fans have an intelligence deficit to begin with ).

Everyone still thinks of the Sears Tower as that. When I read in an article the name &quot;Willis Tower&quot;, I had no idea what they were talking about at first. 

Also, consider this: The Cubs have not won a World Series since they&#039;ve been at Wrigley, so why is everyone so adamant about keeping the name. Maybe a name change would send some subliminal message to the players and coaches/management that things are changing and they don&#039;t have to suck anymore. 

It&#039;s not like I&#039;m advocating a new park, It&#039;s just a stinking name change. It&#039;s NOT the end of all things Cubs and holy as we know it.

I now return you to your swearing at me ( already in progress ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like there are an awful lot of alleged Cubs fans that care more about having the Cubs play in Wrigley ( and by God, it had BETTER be called that ) than they care about the Cubs winning.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know I&#8217;m going to be a pariah here, but can those of you that I referred to above just remove the Cubs ear plugs from your ears and listen for a minute?</p>
<p>If the Ricketts&#8217; would sell naming rights and would be able to make the field now known as Wrigley a more fan friendly and team friendly place ( Cubs only, of course ), wouldn&#8217;t that be worth selling naming rights? I mean, and lets all think about this, is the name of the place going to change your experience at the game? You&#8217;re still going to go to the game, watch the Cubs win (hopefully) and have a good time (whatever that is for each individual). </p>
<p>It won&#8217;t make the Cubs suck or ruin your day. Maybe, it would even make Wrigley a nicer place to watch a game. It won&#8217;t change what any of us call it anyway. </p>
<p>People still call that park on the South Side what it was called before. Sure, some people call it by it&#8217;s new name, but overall, those other fans still call it or think of it by it&#8217;s previous name ( granted those fans have an intelligence deficit to begin with ).</p>
<p>Everyone still thinks of the Sears Tower as that. When I read in an article the name &#8220;Willis Tower&#8221;, I had no idea what they were talking about at first. </p>
<p>Also, consider this: The Cubs have not won a World Series since they&#8217;ve been at Wrigley, so why is everyone so adamant about keeping the name. Maybe a name change would send some subliminal message to the players and coaches/management that things are changing and they don&#8217;t have to suck anymore. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like I&#8217;m advocating a new park, It&#8217;s just a stinking name change. It&#8217;s NOT the end of all things Cubs and holy as we know it.</p>
<p>I now return you to your swearing at me ( already in progress ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

