The Chicago Cubs stand a miserable 39-50 at the pseudo midpoint of the season with almost no mathematical chance of making the playoffs. Their payroll – more than $146 million – is the highest in the National League, and the third highest in baseball, but it hasn’t bought success.

And the man most responsible for putting the team together, General Manager Jim Hendry, finds himself on the brink. But he’s got the support of his boss. Well, mostly.

”Like I’ve always said, I have the highest level of confidence in Jim. I think he’s doing a good job,” said Ricketts, who joined the team Sunday in Los Angeles for the first time since returning from a long family trip to Africa.

Asked before the Cubs’ 7-0 loss to the Dodgers about the likelihood of firing Hendry after this season, Ricketts left the door wide open.

”The fact is that right now Jim is our general manager,” he said. ”I support him. I think he does a great job. And after that, we’ll just take it one day at a time.” CHICAGO SUN-TIMES.

Support does not get more tepid.

My reading tells me that Hendry has almost no chance of surviving the winter. When a boss says things like “right now,” and “one day at a time,” he’s working very hard to avoid any confirmations of the future. And he is doing so because he believes the future to be anything but certain – he has doubts about Jim Hendry. It is truly that simple.

One consideration that comes along with Hendry’s possible departure from the Chicago Cubs’ organization: what happens to scouting director Tim Wilken? Since coming to the Cubs, Wilken has almost single-handedly reinvigorated the Cubs’ farm system. He is roundly considered one of the best of the best, and should there be a shakeup in the organization, he would have his choice of MLB gigs.

But would he leave simply because Hendry gets ousted? Ken Rosenthal has said so, though he doesn’t purport to have any inside knowledge on the issue. At a minimum, it’s a risk associated with canning Hendry. But is that a reason to keep Hendry in a role he’s obviously ill-suited for? Would Hendry consider taking on a VP role, or a return to the scouting world where he, like Wilken, was considered one of the best?

  • pygreg

    I would keep Hendry just for Tim. He’s not *terrible* at GM, he’s just not amazing. And I’m hoping some of the retarded deals he’s given out were because of Tribune pressure to make a profitable winning team RIGHT AWAY and maybe with more freedom we’ll have less Sorianos and Kosukes. But Wilken is awesome and I want him to stay.

    • bric

      The last couple of years Hendry’s proven he’s good at three things: Acting like he’s smarter than everybody else, listening blindly to his coaches, and wasting money. Why else would he dump Mike Wuertz and Chad Guadin and lose a couple mil for nothing in return? Because it wasn’t his money and Pinella didn’t like ’em. Why take a chance on Bradley? Because Lester Strode said he’s a good guy. Why else not go out and find some veteran releivers for the bullpen? Cause Pinella said that Caridad is the setup guy. Remember him?
      Make no mistake- next years’ Cubs is gonna look just like this year’s. Decent starting pitching, too many lefties in the bullpen and four rookie righties to blow one run games in April and make for another long season. Hendry’s job hinges on what he does in the next two weeks. Too bad he’s smarter than listening to all the analysts and fans because a couple of minor deals aint gonna save his job.