Another day, another rankings accolade for the Chicago Cubs’ top prospect, outfielder Brett Jackson. He’s been ranked among the top 50 prospects in baseball.

Jackson’s ability was recognized on’s 2011 Top 50 Prospects list, announced on Tuesday night, at No. 46. Jackson checked in one spot ahead of pitcher Chris Archer, who was sent by the Cubs to the Rays as part of the recent Matt Garza trade.

The 6-foot-2, 210-pound outfielder was the Cubs’ top pick in the 2009 First-Year Player Draft and the 31st selection overall. Jackson played three years collegiately at Cal, before making his way through three stops in the Cubs’ Minor League system during that first year with the organization.

In 2010, Jackson suited up for Class A Daytona and Double-A Tennessee, posting a combined 12 home runs and 66 RBIs. The fleet-footed left-handed hitter also knocked out 32 doubles and 14 triples, while producing a .298 average. Jackson looks to be a leadoff man of the future for the Cubs, supported by his 103 runs scored and 30 stolen bases amassed over 128 games in 2010.

While the ranking is welcomed, it actually strikes me as lower than what I would have expected. As the top prospect in a top 15 system, you’d expect to see Jackson in at least the top half of the top 50 – but, it’s all academic at this point. He’ll have an opportunity to prove it on the field in 2011, and could even end the year as a non-prospect (that is to say, as a member of the Major League team).

And in case you were wondering, Chris Archer – the Cubs’ former top pitching prospect who was traded to the Rays in the Matt Garza deal – comes in one spot behind Jackson, at 47.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Brett Jackson is – Still – a Top Prospect | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary --

  • pfk (Peter F. Kempf)

    I think the interesting thing is that Archer is ranked below Jackson. And, the Royals should be interesting to watch as they are loaded with top prospects.

  • CubsFanatic

    Jackson was the only Cubs prospect….Am I the only one saddened by this? We need to hit some serious gold this year in the draft.

  • KB

    How do you figure the Cubs have a top-15 system?

    • BT


      also, you’ve already stated that Hendry/Wilken have effed up every single first round pick they’ve made, so you aren’t allowed to like Jackson.

      • Serio

        So does he have a shot of making the 2011 Cubs????

        • BT

          Not unless someone gets moved. there is no reason to bring him up as our 5th OF.

  • VanSlawAndCottoCheese

    “And in case you were wondering, Chris Archer – the Cubs’ former top pitching prospect who was traded to the Rays in the Matt Garza deal – comes in one spot behind Jackson, at 47. ”

    Yes, Ace, your blockquote told me so. :9

    • Ace

      Ha. Snap. I suck.

      • VanSlawAndCottoCheese

        Hardly. Or do I mean “heartily”?

  • http://bleachernation ramy16

    Ace i was wondering with the 9 overall pick in the draft what good third baseman is available? and what names are out there…thanks! also why in the fuck do we have a stupid shit bird fan on our blog!! i thought this site is for cubs fans>>>

    • Bric

      Since Ace rarely deletes or blocks off topic questions (thankfully, because I’ve had a bunch myself) but also fails to respond to them, I’ll do him him the favor and ask who you’re talking about. Cardfan? I haven’t seen him post on here in months. The other posters on this article are all clearly Cub fans. In any case, Bleachernation is what makes America great. It’s like a library- anyone can use it.

    • Ace

      I was mulling the substantive question (to be honest, no idea – but Wilken doesn’t target specific needs, so the Cubs will grab a third baseman only if he’s the best player on the board at that time), and missed the other question.

      Bric’s right, Cardfan is fine in my book. Smart, adds interesting content, and isn’t a douche. The world is wide, ramy. We’re all welcome.