Quantcast

Another (February) day, another article about free-agent-to-be Albert Pujols. This one comes fromĀ Buster Olney, who correctly notes that, should Pujols actually reach free agency, the Chicago Cubs – and particularly owners the Ricketts Family – will face extreme fan and media pressure to go after Pujols with both guns blazing. No offer will be considered too outrageously large – at least not for a few years.

And Olney suggests, as others have, that the Cubs are in the best position to actually land Pujols, if not the Cardinals.

But the pressure on the Chicago Cubs to go after Pujols will be similar to what was heaped on the Knicks and Cavaliers last summer, to the point that Tom Ricketts’ relatively young ownership of the club will be defined by how he handles his pursuit of Pujols. In fact, there may be more pressure on the Cubs to sign Pujols — to at least make a hard run at him — than there has been for any baseball franchise to pursue any player since the advent of free agency in 1976.

This is part of the reason some rival executives fully expect that the Cubs will be serious bidders for Pujols in the fall.

“They are in the best position to get him, if he’s willing to leave the Cardinals,” said one general manager. “The Red Sox and Yankees won’t be in it, and if the Cubs get him, it could hurt their [primary] rivals for years. They’re in a position to do serious damage to the Cardinals, because he’s such an icon there.”

I tend to think the sign-Pujols-’cause-it-hurts-the-Cards point of view is overdone; increasingly, beating the Cardinals is but 30% of the NL Central story. The Cubs will continue to have several other legitimate teams to contend with in the Central – not to mention the NL – so screwing the Cardinals by signing Pujols should be viewed as less about improving the Cubs’ chances and more about the metaphorical kick to the crotch. Enjoy it for what it is.

  • CubsFanatic

    I really hate how people are talking about the off season when the season hasn’t even began…I couldn’t care less if we sign Pujols or not. I mean fine if we do, but he shouldn’t eat our budget away for 10 years either. Wanna win? Less money to get good talent to surround you.

  • KB

    I agree 100% with Olney: the Pujols situation actually comes at a very good time for Cub fans. We get a litmus test…either Ricketts is going to be a winner, or he’s going to be like P.K. Wrigley and the Trib (content to spend juuuuuust enough to keep some fans in bthe seats and make a tidy profit.)

    To me it’s awesome, because of the Black and White/all-or-nothing nature of it; if he LANDS Pujols, he’s the real thing. If Pujols signs with any other team, I may just stop following the Cubs…I can’t take another 40 years of pain.

    • Ace

      Agreed; relatedly: if the Cubs have a chance to sign Pujols, his salary should not hinder the rest of the budget. In other words, if the Cubs sign him, the payroll should go up substantially, rather than merely having his salary replace expiring contracts.

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+