Quantcast

dusty-baker-failEditor’s Note: Yes, it’s that time of year again – the time for us to settle back into our protective bubble where the Chicago Cubs are destined for greatness, and every other team in the National League Central is bound for spectacular failure. If you’d care to check out last year’s fare: St. Louis CardinalsCincinnati RedsMilwaukee BrewersPittsburgh PiratesHouston Astros.

The 2011 Major League Baseball season is nearly upon us, and that means every sports publication in the world puts out a season preview. Some are interesting, some aren’t. For the most part, folks just don’t have the time necessary to do the kind of in-depth preview that is going to be of any use to a reader that actually follows the team being previewed.

So most previews end up being pretty surface level, and boring. Well, we’re not going to do that here at Bleacher Nation. It’s much more interesting to simply examine/invent why the team currently sucks and is going to suck in 2011. Of course, had I anticipated the 2010 success of many NL Central teams, coupled with various excellent off-season moves, I may not have tied myself to such a cantankerous exercise. Let’s just say, establishing that the Reds, Brewers and Cardinals are going to suck in 2011 is not an easy enterprise. But this is the life I have chosen, so live it I must.

We’ll be previewing the suckiness of the other teams in the National League Central over the next five weeks. Up first, Dusty’s overachievers: the Cincinnati Reds.

Baseline for Suckitude

The Reds won 91 games last year, taking the NL Central and heading to the playoffs for the first time in 15 years. But then they were swept in three games by the Phillies, which, I mean, what kind of team wins their division handily and then gets swept out of the playoffs in the first round? *kicks dirt*

Last year, I totally predicted the Reds’ surprising success:

“On paper, the 2010 Reds are one of the better teams in the Central. Or not. But maybe. Maybe not. Who knows? Not me.”

Iron clad.

The simple fact is, the Reds didn’t suck last year. They won the Central by five full games over a solid Cardinal team, and it wasn’t luck: the Reds’ expected W/L was 92-70. In other words, given the runs they gave up and the runs they scored, the Reds were every bit as good as their record suggests. Harumph.

Sucky Offseason Moves

Sad Arrivals: SS Edgar Renteria (free agent), OF Jeremy Hermida (minor league free agent), OF Fred Lewis (free agent).

Happy Departures: RHP Aaron Harang (free agent, signed with Padres), LHP Arthur Rhodes (free agent, signed with Rangers), INF/OF Willie Bloomquist (free agent, signed with Diamondbacks), RHP Micah Owings (free agent, signed minor league deal with Diamondbacks), RHP Russ Springer (retired), OF Laynce Nix (free agent, signed minor league deal with Nationals), OF Jim Edmonds (retired).

Once again, not a lot going on in this space for the Reds. Their offseason was not devoid of moves, however, as the team signed star Joey Votto and budding star Jay Bruce to extensions. They also signed pitchers Bronson Arroyo (yes! an excuse to post a picture of the flowing locks! now with more corn!) Johnny Cueto to a long-term deal.

Their Very Own Blogoverse Thinks They Suck

You want to frustrate the shit out of yourself for a few hours? Try to find some pessimism in the Reds blogoverse. It doesn’t exists. It’s like trying to find pessimism in the Cublogoverse going into the 2009 season (remember how awesome the Cubs were going to be? Milton Bradley!). Nevertheless, tiny threads of negativity exist here and there at the Red Reporter:

The Reds are paying up to $3 M/yr [for Edgar Renteria], which is valued at something like 0.6 WAR. I have Renteria as a replacement player here, so this comes out as an overpay/waste of money. ::grumble::

Ok, so let’s be fair to the Reds and say that there’s a margin of error of at least +/- 0.5 WAR on any valuation I produce. This really is back of the envelope stuff, here. That means that Renteria really might still be a true talent 0.5 WAR player, which would make an incentive-based contract a fair one if he plays like that. ‘Course, I could also be rating him too high…

Either way, it’s still the case that Janish–who is probably somewhere in the vacinity of a 1 WAR player, I think–should still be the starter. He’s not great, but he’s better than replacement!

Hooray for consternation. Um, about a probable bench player. At least they were unhappy about Bronson Arroyo’s unduly expensive deal:

So it looks like the Arroyo deal is a significant overpay when compared to the rest of the market. Of course, this assessment ignores the special circumstances of the deal, like the deferments and especially the restructuring of the option. But the Reds had the choice to decline the option and let Arroyo go as a free agent, which is looking more and more like the best choice in hindsight.

Arroyo got three years and $35 million to block one of the many burgeoning Reds’ arms. Compare that with the three and $33 million Ted Lilly got, and the Red Reporter is right – it doesn’t look great.

The Suckiest Part of Their Suck

The back end of the Reds’ bullpen could have some issues, but shortstop is the clearest concern. Although the Reds signed Renteria, he’s not expected to start at the position. That job falls to Paul Janish (he’s not Jan, he’s just a little Janish), a guy whose pedigree screams utility player. He sports a career .226/.308/.326 line, which is awful, but could be bearable at short if he were more than merely passable defensively. Renteria will pick up some starts as well – particularly given Dusty Baker’s preference for vets – but he hasn’t been a decent option since 2007 (one post-season aside).

And in the End

They suck.

Despite being a reigning division winner, the Reds are not without flaws. Perhaps the most troubling aspect is not a particular position. It’s the manager. Yes, I’m talking about Dusty Baker.

Do I sound like a bitter Cubs fan, lamenting Dusty’s success with the 2010 Reds while the Cubs floundered? Probably.

But there’s no denying that Baker makes questionable decisions with respect to young players, and as a small-market team whose very lifeblood is the health and development of its young players, Baker remains a poor fit to lead the Reds. Did it show last year? Nope. There’s no arguing that it did. But the longer guys like Travis Wood, Mike Leake and Aroldis Chapman are exposed to Dusty’s particular brand of pitcher use (think racks, hot pokers, and the final scene in ‘Braveheart’), the more likely they are to go the way of the Mark “Dodo” Prior. Think this horse is too often beaten unfairly? I don’t. Just ask Aaron Harang, who now publicly states that the way Baker used him so severely fatigued his arm that it jacked him up for a season and a half.

Still, while Dusty will do his best to derail it, I suspect the young pitching could be even better this year, assuming they finally fulfill the promise they’ve been riding on for years. Leake and Wood could be future stars, and Johnny Cueto had made quiet improvements. Edinson Volquez, outside of his first season with the Reds (you know, the one after he was traded for Josh Hamilton), has proved little other than an impressive ability to serve a performance-enhancing drug suspension while rehabbing from Tommy John surgery. That is not say he could not be better in 2011.

The lineup, on the other hand, is not terribly imposing. Scott Rolen is on the downside of his career, Jay Bruce has yet to really live up to his considerable minor league hype, and expected Gomes-Hernandez-Janish trio at the bottom of the lineup gives opposing pitchers four consecutive relatively easy outs. I simply don’t see the Reds’ lineup being as productive in 2011 as it was in 2010 (quick, which team led the NL in offense? yeah, it was the freaking Reds), particularly when you factor in statistically expected regression from Joey Votto.

Ultimately, the Reds are an NL Central contender this year. But they come with as many questions as any reigning Division champ in recent memory.

Thus, they suck.

  • Kenny L.

    FINALLY. I was wondering when the series was finally going to start. Thanks – fun read as always.

    • Ace

      Thanks, Kenny. I try.

  • wax_eagle

    Ace. Your inspiring words instill hope in all of use for this coming season.

    • Ace

      Careful. The “Why the 2011 Chicago Cubs Will Suck” would be exceedingly easy to write…

      • wax_eagle

        You are no doubt correct. I could probably give you 1500 words on that one by Monday…

        • Cardfan

          Can I be a “guest contributor”?

          • Ace

            I tell you what – if want to write a “Why the 2011 Chicago Cubs Will Suck,” I would gladly publish it.

            Assuming it didn’t, you know, suck. Which would be all kinds of ironic.

            • Cardfan

              Me and my big mouth!

              Let me ponder that one. The bar is set pretty high here…

  • Pingback: Why the 2011 Cincinnati Reds Will Suck | Bleacher Nation | Chicago … | cincinnatireds.sportsblogstoday.com

  • http://SOI veryzer

    The Reds broadcasters suck too.

    • Ace

      That, sir, is very correct.

      • Jeff

        Marty Brennamen said that the Cubs suck and will not be contenders this year.

  • http://rooftop-view.com Jack Nugent

    Interesting quotes from Harang. How do Dusty apologists– Dusty himself being one of them– reconcile with those? I mean, it’s almost certainly Dusty’s fault that Harang got hurt in 2008.

    I’m like you– really bitter toward Dusty. I don’t get why there are Cubs fans out there who defend him. The guy is not a good manager. Period. When you say that walks “clog the bases for the fast guys” you officially lose all credibility in my book. Guy is a moron.

    • Ace

      I think Dusty is defended, in large part, by two groups: (1) Those who feel like he gets an unfair shake (whether it’s because of his managerial style, past decisions, or his race); and (2) those who like that he says “old school” things. To either group, he seems like a good guy, and the Xs and Os of managing don’t really matter much.

      As for how apologists deal with those kind of comments, I think you know the answer – they don’t address them at all.

      • Jeff

        The guy is clearly more of a motivator than a mastermind, and he seems to think otherwise sometimes. I never disliked his personality, it was the way he managed a game and his pitching staff that gave me ulcers. I will not be surprised to see the Reds have injury problems on their pitching staff in the near future.

  • czechXican

    I agree with this article. The Reds were a benefactor of steady offense (which, blows like the wind in every sport, but moreso in baseball) and some GREAT pitching for the first 5 months of the season. But then the wheels fell off, or Dusty ‘HAPPENED’ and they were kind of lucky to hang on.

    Their pitching will be good, but they finish 82-80, 3rd place

  • Pingback: Marty Brennaman: Cubs Not Good Enough to Win Division | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

  • punchclock

    Where did you get your scouting report on Paul Janish? I can guarantee you he will finish in the top 5 in the NL among everyday players in fielding percentage. As a hitter… he sucks.

  • Cubs Suck Worse

    How about those Cubs!

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+