Quantcast

One of the more interesting September story lines is the surprising resurgence of the Tampa Bay Rays and the flagging of the Boston Red Sox. The Red Sox were locked into the AL’s final playoff spot as recently as two weeks ago, but, following a three-game sweep by the Rays, the Sox stand just three games ahead of the Rays.

Why do I say this is interesting? Is it because I care deeply about the AL East and the tantalizing and infinitely repeating story that is the Red Sox and Yankee dominance thereof? Is it because I like seeing the little guy come back?

Don’t be ridiculous. I care only about the Cubs.

The Cubs, as you may or may not recall, have a job opening that they might well like to fill with one of the two gentleman currently running the Boston and Tampa Bay organizations – general managers Theo Epstein and Andrew Friedman, respectively. Though Chicago Cubs Chairman and Owner Tom Ricketts might be willing to wait out baseball’s playoffs for a chance to speak to the candidates of his choice, it couldn’t hurt to start that/those dialog(s) as soon as possible.

That’s why the AL East race intrigues me. Only one of the Red Sox and Rays will make the playoffs (the Yankees are up four on the Red Sox and seven on the Rays), and it’s possible that whichever GM candidate’s team stays home could find its leader in early talks with the Cubs. At least, that’s what we hope.

But Tampa Bay owner Stuart Sternberg, a close friend of Friedman’s, doesn’t sound particularly concerned about his leading man heading off for greener pastures after his team’s season is over.

“I’m concerned about anything happening good or bad for any of my employees,” Sternberg said, “but Andrew is a partner here. He’s a partner of mine. And he treats this organization even better than I possibly can. There’s nothing to report on [Friedman looking at other positions after the season] …. We’ve been at it now, it’ll be six years, and it doesn’t feel like six years, and I would think we would keep the band together another six years.”

If you’re desperate to read in a pang of fear, you could probably find it somewhere in the “I would like to think we would keep the band together” part. But, to me, there isn’t much meat there.

Still, an owner’s confidence that his GM will not leave is to be expected. That one friend and partner would not want to believe another friend and partner would leave their enterprise is unsurprising. What would be surprising is if Friedman absolutely refuses to consider the possibility of escaping the AL East for greener pastures (green = money with which to play). I won’t predict he’d actually leave, but to not explore the option at all?

For what it’s worth, Sternberg says no one has asked for permission to speak to Friedman, but that doesn’t mean much for at least two three reasons: (1) the Cubs might well be waiting to interview candidates like Friedman until after their team’s season is effectively over (which is probably the right thing to do); (2) Sternberg has no reason to candidly say, “yes, the Cubs asked to interview Andrew, and I said ‘sure'”; and (3) Ricketts has said he’ll be keeping the search quiet, and as I’ve already noted, the Cubs have circulated a request to all teams to please keep contacts between the Cubs and prospective interviewees strictly confidential (something I’m certain other teams will honor as a professional courtesy). Remember: the Cubs kept Jim Hendry’s firing a secret for a month. If they don’t want interview information to leak, it won’t.

That all said, it remains likely that the Cubs will at least attempt to make a pitch to Friedman. Whether he’ll listen – be available to listen – is up to him. In the meantime, Friedman will have to hope his $40 million Rays can continue a late season hot streak to catch the two $160 million+ behemoths that (always) tower over them.

  • Cubs_Fanatic

    In all honesty, I hope either Epstein or Cashman get the job. But I’ll be happy anyway since Hendry is gone. I’d just like Epstein or Cashman.

  • CubFan Paul

    Stuart Sternberg’s number One mistake? Not signing Friedman to a contract, so Friedman will listen to Ricketts, the Astros & whoever else is that is willing to give him want he wants

    • Jeff

      The Rays sign guys to contract extensions? I’ll believe it when I see it.

  • Internet Random

    [A]s you may or may not recall . . . .

    Heh. Nice touch.

    • http://www.bleachernation.com Brett

      Thank you. Hoped that would land.

  • die hard

    have we considered if new guy might be coming from another sport?….say Basketball?….someone there who has lots of baseball experience also….basically we need a
    good judge of personnel and personalities who can get along with Ricketts, willing to defer to him at all times…..I have nobody in mind…but just thinking out loud…

  • Mike Foster

    Brett, your last sentence really says it all. Even a friend wouldn’t deny a friend the opportunity to move to a behemoth….so to speak.

  • KB

    Friedman is the only candidate with legit experience at turning a bad franchise around. Cashman and Epstein both took over the reins of teams that were loaded with superstars, and poised to compete for the pennant. Friedman took over the MLB equivalent of the L.A. Clippers, and has led them to glory.

    To me, he’s the only excellent choice. All the others would be a fine-enough back-up choice, but not the plum guy.

    • http://www.bleachernation.com Brett

      Some would argue (I’m not necessarily one of them) that Friedman took over a farm system that was loaded with superstars.

      • T Wags

        Exactly. Im not going to hold it against Friedman either necessarily, but when you’re picking at the top of the draft every year for so long its hard not to be a contender eventually…

      • Jeff

        His draft picks have all kind of stunk outside of Longoria and Price, who went 3rd and 1st. Other than that, Jeremy Hellickson is the only one who has impacted the team. Friedman’s strength is his ability to work the trade market, I haven’t been impressed with his drafting.

        • T Wags

          And this is why we better keep Tim Wilken.

  • die hard

    To follow up….how about Danny Ainge?…..A basketball gm with baseball experience….he may be looking for a new challenge….burnt out on basketball…he knows what it takes to build a winner…this talent crossovers to any venture…

  • Saluki

    Geez, die hard, I appreciate you thinking ‘outside the box’, but Ricketts would be hung from the El rails at Addison Station if he conjured up such a move…

  • Cara

    Yea I don’t see the Ainge thing happening, or any basketball gm for that matter, for te obvious reason that NBA teams don’t have a farm club. Half of running a baseball team is building up a good farm system. Ainge would come in and do exactly what has been done with the Cubs for years, pay “superstars” to come for a couple years with no thought on what to do if thy get hurt, don’t pan out, get run out town with pitchforks, etc. It would spark people’s interest, but wouldnt be worth te risk in the long run.

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+