The Theo Epstein Saga: A Question of Leverage

A few thoughts to chew on this evening as the Theo Epstein drama continues to unfold…

The word of the day, apparently, is leverage. Specifically, the issue is whether leverage exists in the present discussions between the Chicago Cubs and the Boston Red Sox regarding compensation in exchange for Epstein’s services in 2012, and, if so, who has it. Because discussions have degraded considerably in the last two days (reports say Red Sox President Larry Lucchino is taking things personally, and is out for blood), whichever side has the stronger fallback position probably has the upper hand in negotiations.

According to the Boston media, any leverage that exists falls in the Red Sox’s favor. Case in point, Peter Abraham today writes that “the Sox have all the cards. Ben Cherington is running the baseball operations department and appears to have the full confidence of ownership. They can let Epstein and the Cubs stew as long as they want.”

Thus, those falling on this side of the leverage question would say, “the Red Sox would be wise to let the Cubs twist in the wind until they acquiesce and offer up the pick of the prospect litter.”

And yet, I keep coming back to the same thought: would the Red Sox actually risk the financial, public relations, and prospect hit by cutting off discussions with the Cubs?

Red Sox owner John Henry has already publicly said that Theo Epstein is leaving Boston. He’s also already started the local narrative that things need to change for 2012. It is unfathomable that Epstein could return to the Boston in any meaningful role.

In other words, the only real “leverage” the Red Sox have is to break off talks with the Cubs, let Cherington continue on as GM, force Epstein to sit out the 2012 season (or “work in the mail room”), and pay him his $3+ million salary in addition to his $3.5 million “closure” bonus. Oh, and did I mention that they’d make themselves out to look like the greatest villains in all of sports? Can that really be called leverage?

I’d call it a nuclear option.

But it exists, and, when framed that way, I suppose the Red Sox do “hold all the cards.” After all, there’s no response to it. Right?

Well, if we’re getting extreme, how about this response?

What if the Cubs were to reach out – quickly, if not already – to a prospective GM candidate who, regardless of his role, would like to work with the Cubs and for Theo Epstein? What if the Cubs were to bring that candidate on board now – role to be determine – leaving them with a visible back-up plan for 2012, should Theo be forced to sit out next year and sign with the Cubs after the season? After all, if Ben Cherington’s presence gives the Red Sox leverage, would not, for example, Rick Hahn or Josh Byrnes’ or Dan Evans’ presence on the Cubs neutralize that leverage? The rub, of course, is finding a guy who would be willing to play that part, and who is adequately accomplished to actually run the Cubs for a year (read: not Randy Bush). A second rub, I suppose, is the presumption that Epstein is indeed willing to come to the Cubs in 2013, rather than kicking the tires on any other open gigs.

If the Cubs could find the right guy, then the worst case scenario is a 2012 season run by a kind of interim GM, who knows that, come 2013, he’ll be serving under Epstein. The titles could be tricky, but are, in most respects, entirely academic. Whether the interim guy is the “General Manager,” and Theo comes in as the “President of Baseball Operations,” or the interim guy is actually just called the “Interim General Manager,” is largely a matter of semantics. The point is: the Cubs would have a legitimate fallback plan to which to point if the Red Sox continue to puff up and threaten the Cubs to sweeten the pot.

This would undoubtedly change all questions of “leverage,” and could leave the Cubs sitting pretty. It could swing things so decidedly in the Cubs’ favor that, not only do the Cubs give up less in terms of prospects, but Epstein may also be able to choose a couple of his favorite Red Sox employees to come on over with him to Chicago. And, they’d have a GM-calibre front office talent ready and waiting to work alongside Epstein. Win-win-win.

You’ll note, making this kind of move is more about putting the Cubs in the best possible position to call the Red Sox’s bluff (in case, you know, it isn’t a bluff) than it is about actually bringing someone else on board to run the team in 2012. It hinges on having an attractive GM candidate not named Theo Epstein willing to come to the Cubs under these complex circumstances.

Maybe it’s a pipe dream, and maybe the differential in prospects is not worth the effort. Or maybe I’m just looking to take my mind off of Michigan’s atrocious performance at Michigan State today. But if the Red Sox’s demands are outrageous, here’s hoping that the machinery is in motion.

It’s at least worth discussing, eh?

Brett Taylor is the editor and lead writer at Bleacher Nation, and can also be found as Bleacher Nation on Twitter and on Facebook.

64 responses to “The Theo Epstein Saga: A Question of Leverage”

  1. Rooster

    Wow, Tony Massaroti is going to have a heart attack.  Watching a recording of Chi Trib Live…wow, Theo hungrier than ever.  Red Sox nation sounds very messed up right now.  Circus over there.  They don’t want him.  They’re asking for the world.  Brett Jackson is NOT going anywhere.  5 tool outfielder, not a chance.  Why would you give away your best player in the minors?  He’s hasn’t even swung a bat in the majors.  Not way does Theo walk through those doors in Boston.  Call their bluff and tell Henry to WALK!  They would then be lucky if they got 3 million.

    Brett, how do I get my avatar from the message board to the forum.  I need an identity.  THANKS, great site for up to the date news on the Cubs front.  Suntimes is always 2 days old, gives the obvious…you dig deeper and give us the true details of the stories and rumors.  Great work.  Keep it up.

  2. Cheryl

    More and more impressed with Ricketts and how he’s handling this. If this is a personal thing on the side of Boston and it sure looks like that from here Selig will probably step in. But what can he do? Can he bring this “circus” to a close?

  3. LouCub

    Allard Baird and Josh Byrnes as your two top assistants would be a rock solid front office at the top..Considering how Lucchino and Henry were criticizing the conditioning of their pitchers on WEEI, i’d be surprised if they wouldn’t let their head trainer go..

  4. Theo Compensation Talks “Moving Along” and Other Bullets | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

    [...] and are expected to continue that way through today. Maybe the Cubs have already put together a backup plan, which is pressuring the Sawx to be a bit more reasonable. We may never [...]

  5. Rumor: Cubs and Red Sox’s Talks Nearing Conclusion, Theo Epstein and Josh Byrnes to Join Cubs’ Front Office | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

    [...] if the drama served as a vehicle by which the Cubs were able to pull in someone like Byrnes to join Epstein? Sign me up for [...]

  6. Theo Epstein Squeal Watch: Now Sources Say Red Sox Demands Might Delay Deal | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

    [...] Kaplan also tweeted that the deal would get done eventually because there is “no chance” the Red Sox are willing to pay Epstein $7 million (his 2012 salary plus his “conclusion” bonus, which the Cubs are willing to pick up if Epstein comes over now) to be a lame duck next year. Kaplan suggested the Cubs could set up a front office with all the necessary parts, besides Theo, in order to wait out the Red Sox. Sound familiar? [...]

  7. Report: Chicago Cubs Interested in San Diego Padres’ GM Jed Hoyer | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

    [...] also be remiss if I didn’t point out that these machinations align almost perfectly with the suggestion I made on Saturday – namely, that the Cubs try to line up a “back-up” GM now, someone who wants to [...]