Nate Silver is as “it” as a statistician can become, having used polling data and statistical┬ámodels to correctly predict the presidential election outcome in all 50 states. A former sabermetrician who invented the PECOTA system and cut his teeth with Baseball Prospectus, Silver graduated to “the real world,” and runs fivethirtyeight, a New York Times blog featuring the aforementioned electoral prediction system (among other things). The 2012 presidential election wound up serving as a bit of a referendum on the use of statistical analysis/modeling to predict things like elections – and baseball performance – and, to the extent that was a legitimate exercise, Silver came out looking like a genius.

In the ensuing media blitz, Silver spoke with Crain’s Chicago about a variety of things, which naturally included the Chicago Cubs. You can see the video below (or at that link if the video doesn’t work for you).

Among Silver’s thoughts on the Cubs, which starts around the 2:25 mark:

  • The rational mind says, and the probabilities suggest, the Cubs will win it all within Silver’s lifetime (he’s 34). But some things, like the Cubs’ historic failures, defy statistical explanation (he was being cute, not actually making an analytical point).


  • It generally takes three or four years to turn a team around.
  • It’s a good thing that many fans have “turned against the Cubs,” which could incentivize ownership to spend sufficiently to put a competitive product on the field. That, according to Silver, wasn’t always the case for previous Cubs owners, who could reap the benefit of a packed Wrigley Field without regard to how much they spent on payroll. (I’d note only that this ownership group, I believe, has wanted to win from day one (in 2010), so fans “turning against the team” hasn’t really been much of a kick in the pants for these owners – the desire to win has been.)




Keep Reading BN ...

« | »