Quantcast

scott hairston metsScott Hairston has been mentioned as an outfield option for the Cubs around this place only in passing, and only a handful of times. With a report just last week that he was limiting his choices to the New York Mets and the New York Yankees, it didn’t seem like discussing Hairston made too much sense (save for his impact on the Alfonso Soriano trade market).

But apparently the Yankees’ interest in Hairston is tepid, and the Mets, for whom he played last year, recently balked at his reported two-year, $8 million asking price (or did he ask for $8 million each year? Hard to tell from Heyman’s tweet – I’ve asked him to clarify). From there, perhaps Hairston decided to open up his discussions.

To that end, Jon Heyman just reported that, as a non-New York alternative, Hairston has “talked” to the Cubs, specifically.

It makes sense, as it always has. The Cubs are looking for a right-handed hitting outfielder who can play in right field and center field (to spell lefties Nate Schierholtz and David DeJesus, together with righty Dave Sappelt), and that’s certainly Hairston. The 32-year-old outfielder can handle all three outfield positions, and put up a nice .263/.299/.504 line over 398 plate appearances last year. Those plate appearances were split evenly between lefties and righties (199 and 199), and his .867 OPS against lefties obviously pulled up his .739 against righties. The latter isn’t horrible, but it’s clear he’s at his best against lefties (.825/.704 split for his career).

If the Cubs could get Hairston on a deal even more favorable than the two years and $8 million he wants (since the Mets aren’t willing to pay that much), then he’s a great asset to bring into the fold. At that price? Well, that’s probably at least his actual value, and might even leave a little room for the all-important surplus value. Given the market, it sure seems like $4 million per year isn’t too much for Hairston to ask – indeed, I really do wonder if he’s asking for $8 million per year. Obviously that would be too much, but isn’t that usually what players ask for?

Lastly, as much as folks have grown weary of hearing it, Hairston on, say, a two-year deal could have trade value, depending on how things shake out over the first few months of the season. Yes, I’m saying he could be a “flippable asset,” depending on he performs (and how the Cubs perform).

Or, his addition could make dealing someone like Alfonso Soriano much more absorbable. Hairston obviously doesn’t replace Soriano’s production, but he’d make the loss of Soriano more manageable. Further, taking Hairston off the market makes Soriano just a touch more valuable.

  • ssckelley

    Knowing he wants to play in New York this reeks of an agent ploy to leak out rumors the Cubs are involved. Everyone wants the Cubs involved because they have money to spend and they can be used to drive the price up.

    • http://thecubcontrarian.blogspot.com Kyle

      Agreed.

    • http://www.viewfromthebleachers.com Norm

      Don’t think it’s all that far fetched that the Cubs have talked to Hairston.
      And I don’t believe the “he wants to play in NY” bit. Hairston is from Naperville and I have no doubt that he would be ecstatic playing for the Cubs. A friend of a friend of a friend told me.

      • CubFan Paul

        we have enough OBP problems. no thanks

  • CubzFann

    I know the Bryan Lahair experiment is over, as he is off to Japan, but was his defense really so bad in RF that a Nate/Sappelt platoon is going to trump him? I was looking at the 2012 stats, and Lahair and Rizzo were nearly the same. Batting average, along with BBs and Ks, being the biggest difference. How is it that Rizzo is tagged a possible star and Lahair is in Japan? Not complaining just curious.

    • Carew

      It’s because Rizzo was better at only 22 years old and LaHair was 30. Also, LaHair started off hot, but faded very quickly and was very below-average. Too bad, too. I liked LaHair..

    • Chris S

      I think the reasoning behind that is because LaHair’s numbers were on a sharp decline. He had a few good months to start the year, but after the league made adjustments, he didn’t do anything after that. I think Upper Management knew that he wasn’t going to be able to make the adjustments to be a full-time or even platoon player ( even more difficult to make adjustments not playing everyday), so, they let him go to where he might have a chance to succeed.

  • Pingback: Nate Schierholtz Plans to Be the Starter in Right Field | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary()

  • DarthHater

    According to MLBTR and the New York Daily News, the Hairston deal that the Mets rejected was two years for a total of $8 million, or $4 million per year.

    • http://www.bleachernation.com Brett

      Yup. Very interesting – is in this afternoon’s Lukewarm Stove, coming up in a bit.

    • brickhouse

      The Mets countered Hairston’s asking price with a 1 year 2 million dollar offer.

  • Pingback: Lukewarm Stove: Hairston, Samardzija, Price, Bourn, Garza, Soriano, More | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary()

  • Pingback: Cubs Reportedly Agree to Two-Year Deal with Scott Hairston | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary()

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+