Quantcast

dale sveum cubsChicago Cubs President of Baseball Operations Theo Epstein confirmed yesterday that staffing/coaching decisions are coming, and will be announced on Monday. Those decisions will include at least some changes, though the degree and extent of those changes will probably remain a mystery until Monday.

Dave Kaplan, among others, expects that the change will include the dismissal of Dale Sveum, who has one year remaining on his contract. It wasn’t a week ago that I thought a managerial change was extremely unlikely. I no longer feel that way. That’s not to say that Sveum – and/or some of his coaches – might not survive this evaluation period, nor is it to say that he’s not the right man for the job in 2014. I simply no longer think it isn’t a possibility that the Cubs will make a change. That feeling is based on a variety of things – some public, some not – and it leaves me a bit surprised. But the fact is, the gentlemen in charge have far more visibility to the needs of the organization and the successes or failures of the coaching staff than I do. If they believe a change is in order, then they’ll make it, however close to the last decision it might be.

On Sveum, specifically, Dan Bernstein says that the Cubs and Joe Girardi’s camp are in a “very real” courtship process (subject to the rules), and both sides are interested. At least one source tells Patrick Mooney that a Girardi/Epstein marriage could come with a power struggle, though others tell Mooney that isn’t the case. It remains to be seen how things would play out if the Yankees desperately wanted to keep Girardi, and the Cubs desperately wanted to land him. It may never come to that, of course.

Mooney’s piece also has a bit on yesterday’s vogue candidate – again, for a job that may never be open – Brad Ausmus. He may not be as serious of a candidate as Peter Gammons obliquely suggested.

We’ll see if anything new emerges between now and Monday. It would seem that the Cubs are weighing an important and difficult decision here. It would be ideal if they knew they definitely preferred Sveum over any other hypothetical candidate, OR knew that the hypothetical candidate that they prefer is available and immediately willing to sign up. Absent perfect knowledge of one of those two things, the front office will have to choose: stick with Sveum as of Monday, knowing that it may have been possible to land someone else preferable; or let Sveum go, knowing that they may whiff on a better candidate, and end up regretting moving on from Sveum.

Nothing’s easy.

  • jim haley

    Could this Cubs lineup win
    1b-Rizzo 2b-Castro/Alcantra SS-Baez / Barney 3b-Bryant / Murphy
    LF-Soler / Almora CF-Scherholtz / Sczcur RF-**Stanton
    C-Castillo / Navarro
    SP- Sanardzija – Wood – Jackson –
    RP- CJ Edwards – Black – Pinyero – Hendricks – Rondon
    Closer-Strop
    **IMPACT Player each year through free agency

    Its young but exciting to watch – better than the has-beens patchwork we watch this year
    Notice the new relief corp has minor league starters from A & AA.

  • kjundo

    Random question…what happens if the Cubs and Twins have the same identical record at the end of the year? Who gets the number 4 pick and who gets the number 5 pick?

    • fortyonenorth

      Cubs will by virtue of the fact that they had the worse record last year.

  • TheRiot2

    Way to soon to start with the hypothetical lineups.Stanton would empty the farm system when this regime is busy building it up. I think the key to where Bryant plays is in the hands of Olt. He needs to put his eye issues behind him and play to his abilities.Olt’s strong defense and good power could make the Cubs infield the best in baseball in another two years.That happens then an outfield of Bryant,Almora and Soler would be beyond belief.

    • Eric

      No he wouldn’t. Now, I think it’s highly unlikely they land Stanton. But you have to understand, Stanton’s stock is down a bit due to missing significant time to injury, and putting up near league leading but not elite level offensive #’s. The upside is still there no doubt. But I think you could land him with a headliner of Almora, and 3 other very good pieces (guys like Alcantara, maybe pierce Johnson + another, or Almora, CJ Edwards, and a middling prospect). It wouldn’t “empty the farm” IMO.

      • Jason P

        I agree with your general point — the farm is deep enough that no single trade could possibly empty it — but I don’t think the Marlins are going to be selling cheap. If teams aren’t offering premium value, they have no reason to trade him right now. He’s still under relatively cheap team control for another few years.

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+