Quantcast

mike olt!Until Sunday’s offensive breakout, folks started to whisper that the Cubs’ offense was struggling because of the constant lineup shifting. In other words, the struggles were because of the many platoons. And, should the Cubs struggle offensively today, Sunday will be forgotten, and the whispers will start up again.

So, let’s be quite clear about something: the offense isn’t struggling *because* of the platoons. Railing against the platoons for being the reason the offense is struggling is akin to claiming the rock you’re holding keeps tigers away. Correlation is not the same thing as causation. The offense has struggled at times because of bad (luck) sequencing, lack of slugging, lack of walks, cold weather, and a worse-than-average overall offense regardless of lineup. The Cubs’ offense always projected to be weak, but it always projected to be better if players were smartly platooned (and it still projects that way). I won’t hang my hat on Sunday as proof of anything, but it was an example of how things can go well in a platoon system.

It’s also been six games, which, statistically-speaking, is pretty much nothing. Consider that, for his career, Justin Ruggiano hits .249/.319/.492 in 362 career plate appearances against lefties. Do those numbers just go away because he had 6 to 10 crappy plate appearance results this year, half of which came against a guy who happens to be one of the best lefties in baseball (Cliff Lee)? Of course not. It’s easy to get caught up in the moment, but that doesn’t make it right. Even when a guy is “great” against lefties, he’s going to have more crap games than great games. And when you’ve got a sample of, like, two games from which to judge? You have no idea what you’re looking at.

The one piece of the platoon criticism that has some merit as a discussion piece, however, is the long-term versus short-term focus of the Cubs. In the short-term, the Cubs are clearly trying to win April games, and are maximizing platoons to try and make that happen. In the long-term, however, the focus should be discovering and developing potential pieces for 2015 and beyond. These two focuses work against each other, for example, in the cases of Mike Olt and Junior Lake, each of whom is a righty, each of whom has the potential to be a starter in 2015 for the Cubs, and each of whom has sat against righties so far this year.

For me, I have several responses to folks griping about Olt and Lake sitting so much so far:

  • It’s been just six games, and half of those came against lefties. Operating in a strict platoon so far, then, hasn’t really had a seriously deleterious effect on anyone’s playing time. The Cubs have a very deep bench, and they’re making use because of the balance of opposing pitching. That won’t always be the case.
  • In April – early April at that – I have no problem with the short-term focus taking precedent. It’s ok to try your damnedest to win games in April, even if you don’t think your team has a realistic shot at the playoffs. There is plenty of time after April or after May or whenever to flip the switch, end the platoons, and just start guys like Olt and Lake every day.
  • Olt is still dealing with his shoulder issue, and the Cubs are taking it easy on him, in part, for that reason.
  • There’s something to be said for easing young guys into things, and putting them in a position to succeed regularly (when they play) before they become “regulars.”
  • The guy who sees time, so far, mostly in place of Lake is Ryan Kalish, who is, himself, a 26-year-old former top prospect with a particularly unique back-story that puts him among the types of guys who could surprise and become long-term regulars, despite being scrap-heap pick-ups. Isn’t that a guy you want seeing regular starts, too?
  • The guy who sees time in place of Olt is Luis Valbuena, who is not only performing well (.471 OBP), he’s a 28-year-old super utility guy with two years of team control left. What does that mean? If he performs well – as he did last year in a platoon at third base – he could generate legitimate trade value by July. Is that not also an important long-term focus?
  • (To the extent you see Ryan Sweeney as the guy taking starts from Lake, you could pretty much say the same thing as I just laid out there with Valbuena.)
  • As the weeks go by, and especially if they show enough, you’re going to see Mike Olt and Junior Lake getting more starts against righties. So, for now, chill, baby. I’m as (reasonably) excited to see what they can become as anybody. See the above picture.

Bleacher Nation Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Bleacher Nation is a private media site, and it is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago Cubs. Neither MLB nor the Chicago Cubs have endorsed, supported, directed, or participated in the creation of the content at this site, or in the creation of the site itself. It's just a media site that happens to cover the Chicago Cubs.

Bleacher Nation is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Google+