kris bryant cubsApril is an awesome month. It is the month that, finally, after a long winter, brings us daily and meaningful baseball. The spring training games of March are nice, but ultimately mean little. In April the games count. Pitchers aren’t working on pitches, they are working to get hitters out. Managers around the league who did little of it during the spring suddenly start calling for shifts, hit and runs, and sacrifice bunts (to the consternation of many) in an effort to squeeze every run out of their lineup.

April means baseball, with all of the beauty and history that goes with it, is back. That’s the good part of the month.

The bad part is the waiting. Baseball is back, but we still can’t do much of anything with the numbers. Jacob Hannemann has a strikeout rate of 37.9% in Low A, but it isn’t source of conversation because he only has 29 plate appearances. Kris Bryant is on pace for 40 home runs and has walked in almost 18% of his trips to the plate, but small sample sizes keep me from writing incoherent articles chock full of irrational excitement.

Baseball is back, but the season is so new that it is hard to know what any of it means. Even at the major league level, depending on the day you visit the comments on the front page here you’d think the Cubs either have replaced their lineup with nine random people from the bleachers, or that the ’27 Yankees have been recreated Jurassic Park style and are rampaging about the ballpark. It would be nice to think that Anthony Rizzo and Starlin Castro are going to post wRC+ of about 130 all season, for example, but we run back into that sample size issue again.  The numbers are tantalizingly close to being ready for study, but they just aren’t quite there yet.

And so I watch some games, listen to other games, and wait.  Watching and listening is as enjoyable as ever, but working with the numbers is also a part of enjoying baseball.  And that part just hasn’t arrived yet.  

Fortunately there have been some good games to watch and listen to on the farm this season. With the exception of Daytona every team in the system is around .500, and I think Daytona is better than they’ve been playing. There are some notable challenges on the schedule in the coming weeks for the Cubs organization, though. We should know quite a bit more about these teams in two or three weeks than we do now.

But while we’re waiting, we may as well survey the system.

Iowa Cubs : 5-5

The Cubs are in the Pacific Coast League American Northern division this year, so instead fighting Memphis and Nashville as division foes, they now have Oklahoma City (Houston) and Colorado Springs (Colorado). Omaha (Kansas City) also switched into the American Northern division. So far it has proven to be a close division, and at .500 the Cubs are hanging out just a game and a half out of first (if still in last place).

The Cubs have not yet been tested on the road, though. 8 of their 10 played games were at home, and their .500 record while at home doesn’t exactly breed confidence in their ability to win consistently on the road (most teams tend to play better at home). After they complete their current series in Memphis the Cubs head right back home for 8 more games, so it will be some time before we really get a sense of how this team will fare on the road.

As you might expect given the Cubs huge imbalance in home games to start the year, there is a reckoning in their schedule. The Cubs have a doubleheader at home on July 27, and then do not return to the state of Iowa until August 12. If the team in still in contention for a playoff slot that will likely prove to be a crucial road trip, but there is a lot of baseball to be played before that happens.

Tennessee Smokies : 4-5

It hasn’t been the smoothest of starts for the Smokies, but they now sit comfortably in third place in the division, 3.5 games back of first place Huntsville (Milwaukee). Expectations are always high for Tennessee, and it seems that every year of late they have either made the playoffs or been in contention for a slot late in one of the halfs of the season, but those expectations are even higher this year. The core of these Smokies is the same group of players who just won the Florida State League with Daytona last summer, and there is no compelling reason why they can’t claim a title in Double A as well.

The Smokies will be home for much of this next week as they wrap up a series with Chattanooga and then welcome Jackson to town. They head for Birmingham on Saturday, and then come home to face that first place Huntsville team next weekend.

Daytona Cubs : 2-7

Daytona fans are not used to seeing a team in next to last, but that is exactly where the Cubs have wound up a bit over a week into the season. Surprisingly, they are still looking for their first home win.

The Cubs have been in the middle of the pack league-wide in pitching this season, ranking 7th of 12 in ERA, 5th in strikeouts, and 8th in runs allowed, but their offense has struggled a little. The Cubs are 8th in both OPS and runs scored. The season is early yet, and I think this team has more offense on it than we are seeing so far. In each of the past two seasons Daytona has been a very streaky team at times; if these Cubs follow that trend than we could be looking at a five or six game winning streak one day soon.

If that winning streak is going to start soon, though, it will have to happen on the road. Between today and April 25th the Cubs play just three home games (all against Tampa) while facing Dunedin, Clearwater, Brevard County, and Tampa on the road. After two games on the 26th and 27th against Brevard County, they hit the road again for Lakeland. Of course, 12 of their first 14 games in May are at home, so the schedule evens out in a hurry.

Kane County Cougars : 6-3

What a difference a year makes. The Kane County Cougars are in first place. Last season this team was the doormat of the league despite an offense that put up some quality numbers, but as of today they sit tied for the top spot in the Western division with Cedar Rapids (Minnesota).

But will it last? Small sample size alerts do of course apply, but the numbers behind the win/loss column are not encouraging. The Cougars’ have a team OPS of .623, and that ranks them fourth from last. Despite that they have scored the second most runs in the league. That sort of differential is unlikely to continue, and history suggests it will be the runs that come down to meet the OPS rather than the OPS that rises to meet the runs.

On the mound things are similarly cloudy. Kane Count leads the league in walks allowed and is second in home runs allowed. Unsurprisingly they have the fourth worst runs allowed total as well. As more talented pitchers drift up from extended spring training I suspect we’ll see those figures improve, but it could be challenging for this team to maintain a hold on first place if those improvements are slow in coming.

This week the Cougars are on the road, first in Bowling Green and then into Dayton for the weekend. Those games in Dayton will be one of your few opportunities to see this team on MiLB.TV this season. Of course, if you happen to live in Central Ohio you could always head out to the ballpark to see them first hand instead. You could even swing by to visit the aliens while you’re there.

Draft Primer

First, if you haven’t looked through the Top 50 draft prospects on, then go look through the Top 50 draft prospects on It isn’t impossible that we are three months away from two of those guys joining the Cubs’ system.

Of course amateur rankings are very changeable things, particularly now that we are in the middle of an amateur season, so for the latest rankings keep an eye on Baseball America. The latest 2014 Draft Update, for example, kicks Aiken into the stop spot, slides pre-season number one Rodon to three and Vanderbilt ace Beede (sometimes linked to the Cubs) to six.

While many websites dabble in draft coverage from time to time, few remain as focused as Through The Fence Baseball throughout the year. Dan Kirby (who is worth a follow on Twitter) recently posted a very in-depth look at most of the Cubs possible options at No 4. That list is twenty names deep, so deep in fact that it is possible that some of them could slide down to the Cubs in the second round. also posts some quality coverage of the top amateur names, the most recent example being this piece on the big names playing in North Carolina. Those campaigning for the Cubs to take Trea Turner should probably stop reading about halfway through that article, but I have a hard time arguing with the conclusions.

Wondering how the Cubs’ organizational pitching will stack up if they draft a top arm or two in June? Baseball America starts to answer that in a recent Ask BA.

Need more draft goodness? Head for Twitter and follow Ben Badler and John Manuel. Both pass on plenty of draft relevant information via that channel, and by following Badler you’re also tuning into the leading source for international free agent information on the internet.

By this time last season I had already locked in on Bryant as my choice for the Cubs first round choice in the draft, but the field is not as clear cut this year. If I had to pick today I would probably go with Beede or Aiken, in that order, but it is early yet. We have a lot of waiting to do, and that means there is plenty of time for the draft picture to come into a clearer focus.

  • jp3

    Luke you think Almora has any chance of moving up to Tennessee anytime in the next month? Also it leaves me what the return time on Soler was? Thanks for all your hard work.
    Don’t know if anyone is interested in this app but MILB First Pitch app has updated their app from decent to really good this season. If you click on favorite team the cubs it will give you all 6 minor league affiliates overnight box scores which is pretty awesome. I can’t remember if it was free or not though, I’ve had it a couple years.

    • craigp

      Thanks jp3, it is free

      • jp3

        No problem, last year you could only see AA and AAA and it was kind of a pain to move between the 2 leagues but the updated version is easy to move between all 6 Minor league affiliates. Unfortunately it’s one of the bright spots this year is checking minor league box scores.

        • Eternal Pessimist

          I got an i-phone and can’t get gameday without subscription, but can do it on my laptop. Not sure why.

          • Eternal Pessimist

            Oops. Tried to reply to jm.

      • JM

        You using an Apple product? For some reason, MLB At Bast won’t let me get to the Gameday feature. Keeps prompting me to buy the subscription on my iPad. A buddy of mine can get to it on his iPhone and I can get it on my Android phone. What gives?

        • jp3

          I don’t know why it won’t work on Droids, it just asked me for a subscription id or No Thanks Maybe Later option to bypass all that login nonsense.

          • Tommy

            These are not the droids you’re looking for.

    • Luke

      I think the Cubs will keep Almora in Daytona for at least 35 to 45 games before they look at moving him, and I seriously doubt they would move that fast. Right now the FSL pitchers need time to adjust to Almora and, hopefully, force him to have to adjust right back.

    • ssckelley

      The MiLB app is great and they have Gameday for AAA Iowa, similar to the MLB Gameday.

  • JM

    I know the spiel about small sample sizes, but is there anyone exceeding expectations? How long before we start seeing movement among the levels?

    • Luke

      We could start to see some movement next month, but we’re talking mid-June and into July before any serious roster shuffles take place.

  • Assman22

    Great write up Luke…I too was on Bryant all of last year and would take him again in a re-draft…like Appel, Rodon has zero shot at falling to #4, so he’s out…McLeod is a huge Jackson homer as are White Sox…Jed/Theo are more intrigued by the college arms at the top of the draft…will be interesting to see who Cubs take if Rodon/Beede/Jackson are all off the board…

    • cubbiekoolaid2015

      If that scenario took place, and all three were gone, the Cubs would be able to pick one of Hoffman, Kolek, Aiken, Nola, or the top college bat available.(whoever that may be)

      I think I’d pick Aiken in that scenario with Kolek being a close second.

      • Luke

        In that scenario, Aiken without question.

      • ssckelley

        Highly unlikely the Cubs take the top college bat this year, I see none worth a top 5 pick. IMO the Cubs are going with the top available college pitcher or Jackson at #4.

  • BenRoethig

    Luke, why do you prefer Beede over Kolek? Stuff, readiness, or don’t you think Kolek will sign?

    • half_full_beer_mug

      Not Luke, but my guess would be “readiness.”

      Also, I think the days of a high school senior not signing after being drafted in the top 10 are pretty much over. With the slots, and the fact that they would have to forgo three (maybe two) years of getting paid. All the while risking an injury which could severely impact their draft status. It just doesn’t seem like a good gamble to move up less than 10 spots.

      I still think you may see it with college players if they are drafted lower than expected or to a team that they just don’t want to play for because they only are giving up one year.

    • Luke

      Safety. Beede comes with much less risk than Kolek simply because Beede is having a good deal of success in one of the toughest college baseball conferences in the country.

  • Jon

    Beede has been real “meh” of late

  • jp3

    Speaking of meh, Turner doesn’t look anything special. How does someone get labled with having “elite” speed when he has 9 stolen bases in 28 games? He doesn’t impress me at all and still haven’t figured out where l the hub ub came from.

    • ssckelley

      Turner’s draft stock is slipping fast, he might be a middle first rounder now.

      • jp3

        I have to tell you I don’t even know where the upside is for him to be drafted in the middle of the 1st, he’ll maybe he’ll make it to us in the 2nd? I was being sarcastic just to get a rise out of blublud because he’s a huge turner fan but I called him Barney2.0. Not sure I’m not doing Barney an injustice by calling him that.

        • ssckelley

          With tons of speed and playing a premium position at short, where many say he will stick, I have a hard time believing Turner will slip too far down in the first round.

          • jp3

            I’m sure he’s fast but it’s hard to buy “elite” speed with 9 steals in 28 games. What gives with that? His OBP percentage is under .400 so maybe he’s not getting as many opportunities as he should. He seems a little stick impaired to me, say what you like about my Barney comparison but he’s almost identical in Avg/OBP and is on pace for almost identical Stolen base numbers… I’ll pass on him

            • ssckelley

              I loved how you stuck the Barney comparison on Turner.

              • jp3

                Am I that wrong???😄. I feel like everyone downplays how good Barney was in college and I just don’t see turner any better than him.

                • ssckelley

                  Honestly I think Turner will be a better hitter than Barney but I still loved the comparison since Blu used it on Almora.

          • mjhurdle

            The article Luke links has Turner’s speed at 60-65.
            The article makes a good point that, if you believe that Turner is an 80 speed + 65 bat, then he is a top 10 pick without a doubt.
            But if you start knocking those rankings down a little, his value plummets because he is not a great defender and has very little power.
            80 speed + 65 hit tool may be top 10, but 60-65 speed + 55 hit tool with no defense or power is a second round pick at best.

            • Rebuilding

              I’m against drafting anyone in the first round who’s biggest skill is speed. You can be Billy Hamilton and if you can’t hit it really doesn’t matter

              • mjhurdle

                totally agree.
                If was at least projected to be an outstanding defender, then that would be something. But every other skill is average with an above average hit tool. if that hit tool doesn’t translate, then you are stuck with a first round drafted pinch-runner.

                • jp3

                  Isn’t stolen bases another outdated stat too? Unless you’re fairly flawless it really doesn’t help all that much right? I could be wrong on this one though

              • jp3

                But what if with speed he has a “scrappy” tool?😀. Just kidding of course speed+scrappy=campana=no thanks

  • jp3

    Man did Washington luck out 2 years In a row with no doubt number one picks…

    • ssckelley

      We might be saying the same thing about the Astros in a few years, potentially 3 years in a row. I can’t imagine how good the Astros pitching rotation would look with Appel and, potentially, Rodon. Carlos Correa is the one who could make it 3, but with the other players taken in that draft that might have a higher ceiling it might be tough to ever call that one a “no doubt”.

      • Rebuilding

        Think about how good it would look if they had taken Buxton and Bryant. Time will tell, and obviously Correa and Appel are goof prospects, but they may have passed on the future AL and NL MVPs

        • Rebuilding

          *good prospects* lol

        • ssckelley

          I cannot argue Appel over Bryant…honestly I think the Cubs would have done the same thing if they had to choose between the 2 pitchers. But I am with you on Buxton, they missed on him taking Correa over Buxton.

          • Rebuilding

            I’ll just agree to disagree. From everything I’ve heard the Cubs thought Bryant was by far the #1 and were caught off guard a bit when the Astros took Appel (thus the slight delay in their pick as they had to see what exactly Bryant was demanding to get the Astros to pass). Had they taken Bryant the Cubs would have taken Gray

            • ssckelley

              The Astros did do a good job keeping their pick a secret, we can agree on that. But I think Appel will be a solid MLB pitcher.

              Some day the truth will come out.

      • hansman

        Strasburg + Harper > 4 years of consecutive #1 draft picks

  • Alan Griffin

    Luke, thanks for the draft primer. Those links were great.

    If the Cubs take a college pitcher, what is the potential he’d be in the big league rotation to start next year? Also, what’s the earliest these draftees can play within the organization? Are they sent to AZ or some sort of summer league, or must they wait until next season to play?

  • Dumpgobbler

    My top 10 goes like this:

    1. Carlos Rodon
    2. Alex Jackson
    3. Brady Aiken
    4. Tyler Kolek
    5. Bradley Zimmer
    6. Tyler Beede
    7. Jeff Hoffman
    8. Sean Newcomb
    9. Jacob Gatewood
    10. Touki Toussaint

  • Serious Cubs Fan


    So you would take Aiken over Kolek? More upside with the latter, IMO. Beede has great stuff but the lack of consistency would make me shy from taking him with the the 4th pick. I’d lean more towards Hoffman, Kolek, Rondon, Aiken (no specific order) before I picked Beede