The Cubs' "Core" for Ohtani Purposes, MLB Might Be OK with Sports Betting, and Other Bullets

Social Navigation

The Cubs’ “Core” for Ohtani Purposes, MLB Might Be OK with Sports Betting, and Other Bullets

Chicago Cubs News, Chicago Cubs Rumors

I checked out Winterland at the Park at Wrigley last night, and it was a cool spot for families and food-and-craft-likers. The ice skating rink was a literal pond because of the unseasonable warmth, so there was no ice skating (which is a bummer for you, because I was gonna bust out some twirls and backflips and stuff).

  • From Levine’s response to Finfer thereafter, it doesn’t sound like excluding Kyle Schwarber, Ian Happ, and Albert Almora was necessarily intended to be a signal, though some do view those three as the most likely to go if there is a trade for pitching this offseason that involves a big league position player. That said, to me, to the extent the Cubs didn’t emphasize guys like Schwarber or Happ or Almora (or Jason Heyward for that matter), it could simply have been about not emphasizing all the outfielders the Cubs have. Since part of the pitch was that Ohtani could see time in the outfield, it might be in the Cubs’ interest to highlight that the outfield, unlike the infield, is much less “locked in.”
(Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)
  • Mike Petriello writes about the hitting side of the equation for Ohtani – specifically, where would he *actually* see more plate appearances as a hitter, the AL or the NL? It turns out, even in an ideal AL setup, he would only see about 370-400 PAs, versus the *expected* setup in the NL (no starts in the field), where he’d see about 200. He’d more likely see much fewer PAs in the AL, and that could range all the way down to about nothing if his team decides it’s no longer worth having him as the DH. In the NL, he’s always going to have to hit when he starts, and he’ll also have far more opportunities to pinch hit.
  • The Supreme Court is entertaining a case that could lead to legalized sports gambling across the country (instead of solely in Nevada). For many, many years, the top sports leagues opposed legal gambling, ostensibly fearing it could threaten the integrity of their sports. But now, as Hardball Talk notes, the NBA is all for it, and MLB is possibly open to it. For me, it’s one of those ares that has to be handled with kid gloves, not so much because of the threat to the leagues (I actually think it would bring more energy and attention to sports), but because of the risks to individuals associated with gambling. For the most part, I’m a “let adults do what they want to do” person, so I’d support opening up legal sports gambling across the board. But I’d also want to see care devoted to support systems for people who are at risk for totally effing up their lives because of gambling.
  • Here’s the quote from Commissioner Rob Manfred from earlier this year, by the way, via the Hardball Talk piece: “There is this buzz out there in terms of people feeling that there may be an opportunity here for additional legalized sports betting. We are reexamining our stance on gambling. It’s a conversation that’s ongoing with the owners.”
  • Speaking of engaging fans, I find this extremely interesting in light of how incredibly fan-friendly the NBA is in all phases, including very lenient social media sharing policies:

  • Other leagues are much more restrictive with sharing clips and highlights because they are trying to protect TV viewership. Well, you know, just sayin’.
  • Willson Contreras won the home run derby in Venezuela’s highest professional league (h/t OGXRAYZ):

https://twitter.com/LasMayores/status/937901668594782208


HEAD DOWN TO THE COMMENTS OR SHARE THIS SWELL POST WITH YOUR FRIENDS:

Author: Brett Taylor

Brett Taylor is the Editor and Lead Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and @Brett_A_Taylor.