Recent Topics
-
Getting to stud pitchers earlycjdubbya - Yesterday, 12:49 PM
-
Avatar Contest for The Wifehansman1982 - Yesterday, 11:54 AM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 17, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Yesterday, 11:04 AM
-
Is there any insight on John Andreoli?Rated Rookie - Yesterday, 10:05 AM
-
The MLB could learn something from the NHLOswego Chris - Yesterday, 07:56 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Mets 3, Cubs 2 – May 17, 2013
Yesterday, 03:30 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Mets v. Cubs (1:20 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 11:30 AM - Lukewarm Stove: Price Injured, Tigers Need Pitching, Extension Discussions
Yesterday, 10:26 AM - Guest Post: The Most Obscure – or Just Random – Cubs Players of All-Time (Part Three)
Yesterday, 09:34 AM - Series Preview: Mets v. Cubs, May 17 – May 19, 2013
Yesterday, 08:15 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Keep the kids in the Minors.
#1
Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:31 AM
Looking at the positions
Rizzo > LaHare
? ~/>/< Barney (Cardenas sure isn't getting any pt)
Castro = Castro
Vitters =/> Stewart
Clevenger > Soto (as they sit now)
LaHare > Soriano
Jackson > Campy
Szczur < DeJesus (DeJesus might be gone by then)
I forgot to put Lake in there somewhere
As I see it the kids are right there or a little better than the vets (with some movement of LaHare). Am I way off base here?
#2
Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:10 AM
Vitters I think needs a whole season at Iowa to hopefully just demolish the pitching otherwise I dont think his bat is greater than Stewarts glove to offset any difference.
#3
Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:40 AM
I placed Sczur in there just because he's on the 40 man (and ranked as less than DeJesus). Stewarts glove is why I ranked Vitters as =>.I don't think a simple interpretation is appropriate when you factor in guys that haven't played in the majors yet. Yet there's not a lot to disagree with except Szczur is pretty far down the list right now I see Sappelt and Ha above him right now.
Vitters I think needs a whole season at Iowa to hopefully just demolish the pitching otherwise I dont think his bat is greater than Stewarts glove to offset any difference.
I agree that there will be an adjustment period, but it's not like the Cubs are tearing it up right now.
#7
Posted 08 June 2012 - 01:55 PM
I mostly agree withis, but maybe just with the current roster plus/minus any trades.The whole idea of "trying" for the number #1 pick goes against every woody fiber of my being. You try to win as many games as you can.
#9
Posted 08 June 2012 - 02:12 PM
#12
Posted 08 June 2012 - 02:58 PM
By bringing up younger players up before the roster expansion you are also using an option on that player if he has to waived and returned to a MILB club.
#13
Posted 08 June 2012 - 03:01 PM
Though not expressed September is when I was thinking of (mostly).There is only one Mlb ready player in the system and that be Rizzo. The rest of the AAA's would be better off playing every day at their current levels. September roster expansion is the time to start working some of the more higher prospects into the parent club
By bringing up younger players up before the roster expansion you are also using an option on that player if he has to waived and returned to a MILB club.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










