The problem is that T Wood did the "shit work" alright, but it was ON the Cubs. I don't have the kind of appreciation that says "protect the pen" as I'd say managers do. My thinking is more simplistic, like Win the F'fen game. Worry about the pen arms another day.Not saying I agree with Sveum but some body has to do the shit work. Today it was Wood with 85 pitches.
Recent Topics
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 22, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 02:49 PM
-
Darwin Barney, BABIP, and xBAPIPCaleb - Today, 10:07 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/22/2013 - 21hansman1982 - Today, 08:33 AM
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - Yesterday, 09:49 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 21, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 03:38 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Today, 01:59 PM - Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Today, 01:41 PM - The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Today, 12:02 PM - Matt Garza Impressed at Least One Scout Last Night, But There’s Still a Trading Hang-Up
Today, 10:17 AM - Darwin Barney Had a Great Night at the Plate … And He’s Quietly Having a Good Season There, Too
Today, 08:30 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Cardinals v. Cubs - July 27, 2012 (TV: CSN)
#106
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:14 PM
#107
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:15 PM
I'm not sure there's even such a thing as a "B Cardinals lineup" unfortunately.
Funniest (or worst) part about his shelling (again) is that he was facing a "B" cardinals lineup. Two of their starters and best players are out today. And he still got sent into orbit.
Nice effort.
True. "B" in relative terms. This wasn't the best they can throw out there. And they still tee off on pitchers.
#108
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:18 PM
#109
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:27 PM
I wouldn't say insane. Harsh, absolutely. But he has been pretty bad lately. I'd preach patience, because, we're probably stuck with Wood for a while (especially if the Cubs are able to move some of the top of the rotation guys like they'd like to).You guys are insane. Wood, after being a perfectly acceptable back-of-the-rotation starter for 2 1/2 months, has two crappy games in a row and you're all ready to feed him to the pigs. I can only assume that much of this is hangover vitriol from the Dempster saga.
#110
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:30 PM
You guys are insane. Wood, after being a perfectly acceptable back-of-the-rotation starter for 2 1/2 months, has two crappy games in a row and you're all ready to feed him to the pigs. I can only assume that much of this is hangover vitriol from the Dempster saga.
Last three starts...8 ER, 6 ER, 8 ER.
He was marginal when called up, torrid for a few starts, then has been completely awful for the last three. Add that to his not good 2011, his awful ST showing and his awful showing in AAA, I think it makes many fans not buy that few start stretch. Instead thinking him as garbage or at best a 5+ ERA #5 fill in.
I don't like him as a starter. Never have. With Reds or with the Cubs. JMO. I pull for him, sure, and he was really good for awhile, but now he's fallen into down right crap. Maybe he'll recover? Let's hope so.
#111
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:32 PM
Well, "divorced from the facts", then. With the exception of one start in May, and his last two appearances, he's given up 3 or fewer runs and pitched through the fifth. That's 9 quality starts out of 12. I'm not really sure what people are looking for in a back-end starter other than that.I wouldn't say insane. Harsh, absolutely. But he has been pretty bad lately. I'd preach patience, because, we're probably stuck with Wood for a while (especially if the Cubs are able to move some of the top of the rotation guys like they'd like to).
You guys are insane. Wood, after being a perfectly acceptable back-of-the-rotation starter for 2 1/2 months, has two crappy games in a row and you're all ready to feed him to the pigs. I can only assume that much of this is hangover vitriol from the Dempster saga.
#113
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:35 PM
Well, "divorced from the facts", then. With the exception of one start in May, and his last two appearances, he's given up 3 or fewer runs and pitched through the fifth. That's 9 quality starts out of 12. I'm not really sure what people are looking for in a back-end starter other than that.
My sentiments exactly. Sometimes memory is only as long as the last start / appearance or 2. Hard to forget for 6 weeks he was one of the best starters in the NL.
#115
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:36 PM
You guys are insane. Wood, after being a perfectly acceptable back-of-the-rotation starter for 2 1/2 months, has two crappy games in a row and you're all ready to feed him to the pigs. I can only assume that much of this is hangover vitriol from the Dempster saga.
Last three starts...8 ER, 6 ER, 8 ER.
Seven (!) starts before that:
1 ER, 3 ER, 3 ER, 1 ER, 0 ER, 0 ER, 2 ER
That's more than twice as many good starts as bad.
#118
Posted 27 July 2012 - 03:21 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










