A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My Book
Oswego Chris - Yesterday, 03:46 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 0, Pirates 1 – May 22, 2013
Yesterday, 08:07 PM
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 04:01 PM
- Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Yesterday, 01:59 PM
- Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Yesterday, 01:41 PM
- The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Yesterday, 12:02 PM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Will teams still consider Garza?
Posted 28 July 2012 - 02:10 PM
I would like to see the Cubs get haul for Garza. If this injury is making teams hesitant to trade top talent I would prefer they hold on to him.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 10:53 AM
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:41 PM
At this point, we should DL him and try again in the winter. The reason being that he's lost much of his luster, and other options are showing up. However, the free agent market which was once thought to feature Cain, Hamels, and Greinke, who could very well extend with the Angels is now highlighted by McCarthy, Sanchez, Marcum, Jackson, and Peavy. All of them are good options, but with the bigger names off the market will get that much more expensive, leaving teams considering other options via trade.
I wouldnt be so quick to pencil greinke into an extension. Angels already have a very bloated payroll which is going to be more inflated every year as their backloaded contracts start to cost them. No matter what your team looks like, there are only so many players you want to be locked into for >5 years
Posted 30 July 2012 - 02:08 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).