Jump to content





Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
 


Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:




Upcoming Calendar Events

There are no forthcoming calendar events

Today's birthdays

No members are celebrating a birthday today

Photo

Trade for Epstein?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 EQ76

EQ76

    Bleacher Bum

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 94 posts

Posted 05 October 2011 - 07:39 AM

So the tribune had some interesting scenarios that the BoSox could ask for or get offered for Epstein if they do in fact want compensation for him should he go to the Cubs.

Which trade would you prefer out of all of these possibilities? Keep in mind that some of these may be better fits in other trades too, so answer wisely. (i.e., Big Z could just as easily go to the Marlins in a separate deal)

Epstein for...

1) Zambrano
2) Byrd
3) Geo Soto
4) Marmol
5) Samardzija
6) Clevenger or Castillo

They also mentioned some players I'd hate to lose like Marshall and B. Jackson..

#2 Fishin Phil

Fishin Phil

    Bleacher Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,765 posts

Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:16 AM

Do they take over the contract as well?

In that case they can have Zambrano and Marmol.
Please don't feed the psychos.

#3 Glenallens One Homer

Glenallens One Homer

    Bleacher Bum

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • LocationDes Moines, IA

Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:19 AM

I say give them Garza and Castro! We are taking Epstein after all, so it makes sense to make us pay. This is how things work in the real world, no need to be reasonable!

/stupidest opinion column in the history of time

#4 Brett

Brett

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 3,305 posts
  • Twitter:BleacherNation
  • Facebook:BleacherNation

Posted 05 October 2011 - 11:16 AM

Bruce Levine was on Waddle and Silvy this morning, and he discussed the compensation the White Sox got for Guillen, which is frequently used as a comparison to what the Sawx should be able to get for Epstein.

Levine basically said it's not a fair comparison because built into the Fish/Sox negotiations was apparently a tampering claim the Sox could have levied against the Marlins, going all the way back to mid-season. He suggested they used that to get a little more value from the Marlins.

In the case of the Cubs/Epstein, that kind of black-hat leverage doesn't exist (as far as we know).

#5 Fearbobafett

Fearbobafett

    Bleacher Bum

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 06 October 2011 - 07:46 AM

I would be ok with any of 1-4 going for Theo. I do think that the cubs will end up doing something with Z and the fish so i wouldn't go there.

If they move Soto however, i think we need to get salty back from the sox to have a back-up to castillo and who knows maybe yet another change of seniory will do salty some good.

Long term getting Epstein in here is the right course of action, so unless we are giving up the farm we need to make it happen. I am in the camp that if he is here, good things/personnel/players will follow.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).