Recent Topics
-
Katie's Epic ShirtMichiganGoat - Today, 05:12 PM
-
BNFL POWER RANKINGS - LATE MAYT C - Today, 04:46 PM
-
-
OH.MY.GAWD.AWESOMEhansman1982 - Today, 03:00 PM
-
Is this the most important draft pick ever?MichiganGoat - Today, 11:32 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 2, Pirates 4 – May 23, 2013
Today, 03:48 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (11:35 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 09:57 AM - Lukewarm Stove: International Prospect, Garza Value, Difficulty in Selling in May
Today, 09:01 AM - Cubs Brass Visits Oklahoma Pitcher Jonathan Gray
Today, 07:50 AM - The Reason the Cubs DFA’d Michael Bowden and Other Bullets
Today, 06:50 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?
#1
Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:56 PM
The author, Randall Munroe*, has started a (very Straight Dope-like) weekly column on physics and math problems. It's a riot. The first installment had to do with baseball. -ish. I think you'd all get a kick out of it. Finally gives us a good answer to what Mark Prior COULD have done, had he stayed healthy.
http://what-if.xkcd.com/1/
* I have a really hard time thinking of anything other than Last of the Mohicans when I meet or read of someone named Munroe. Fucking Magwa.
#2
Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:57 PM
#3
Posted 27 September 2012 - 05:37 AM
#4
Posted 27 September 2012 - 05:38 AM
Holy shit that's awesome.Also, for the Star Wars dorks here (you know who I'm looking at), this one was great, too: http://what-if.xkcd.com/3/
#5
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:29 AM
#6
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:30 AM
A careful reading of official Major League Baseball Rule 6.08(
suggests that in this situation, the batter would be considered "hit by pitch", and would be eligible to advance to first base.
#7
Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:40 AM
It was in the Bullets, but, unlike you, I didn't want to call TWC an inattentive piece of shit.I could very well be wrong, but I think we did the 90% of light thing before (or maybe it was on an engineering blog I peruse). Never the less, good stuff. Never mind I believe it was throwing a baseball at orbital escape velocity on the moon and it let me to the same article.
#8
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:03 PM
Larf.It was in the Bullets, but, unlike you, I didn't want to call TWC an inattentive piece of shit.
I could very well be wrong, but I think we did the 90% of light thing before (or maybe it was on an engineering blog I peruse). Never the less, good stuff. Never mind I believe it was throwing a baseball at orbital escape velocity on the moon and it let me to the same article.
So it was (7/12/12)... when I was on vacation. In Chicago, of all places. So I missed it (and only found out about What If? a month or so ago). So I love you all. And you can all fuck off. You needed the reminder anyway.
#9
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:19 PM
Eh, he needs the reminder every now and then.It was in the Bullets, but, unlike you, I didn't want to call TWC an inattentive piece of shit.
I could very well be wrong, but I think we did the 90% of light thing before (or maybe it was on an engineering blog I peruse). Never the less, good stuff. Never mind I believe it was throwing a baseball at orbital escape velocity on the moon and it let me to the same article.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










