Recent Topics
-
A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My BookOswego Chris - Today, 03:46 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 22, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 02:49 PM
-
Darwin Barney, BABIP, and xBAPIPCaleb - Today, 10:07 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/22/2013 - 21hansman1982 - Today, 08:33 AM
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - Yesterday, 09:49 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 04:01 PM - Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Today, 01:59 PM - Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Today, 01:41 PM - The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Today, 12:02 PM - Matt Garza Impressed at Least One Scout Last Night, But There’s Still a Trading Hang-Up
Today, 10:17 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Cubs should sign Anibal Sanchez. Here's why:
#1
Posted 12 November 2012 - 04:18 PM
He has been consistent. Around 195 IP per year, 44.5% GB rate, with a .300 BABIP, 0.82 HR/9, around 10% HR/FB, LOB 73.5%. His WHIP has been down-trending as well as his BB%, so I think we'll get his strongest years around '15-'16 (when we'll be competitive).
$15M in '13 (29 years old) for $100M payroll is 15%
$15M in '14 (30 years old) for $105M payroll is 14%
$15M in '15 (31 years old) for $110M payroll is 13.6%
$15M in '16 (32 years old) for $115M payroll is 13%
$15M in '17 (33 years old) for $120M payroll is 12.5%
$15M in '18 (34 years old) for $125M payroll is 12%
No reason to flip this free agent. His playoff experience should also help in the future.
#2
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:04 AM
#4
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:48 PM
#5
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:49 PM
Add Sanchez to a healthy Garza, Shark, Wood, and some one like Marcum, and all of a sudden you have a rotation that looks pretty good.
Yes, Yes, Yes. That would be a pretty good (and flippable, if need be). Even if you were able to trade 2 of Garza, Marcum and Baker you would still have some solid pieces going into next offseason in Shark, Wood and Sanchez.
#8
Posted 13 December 2012 - 07:23 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










