Recent Topics
-
Cubs Calendar - 6/19 - Run Homehansman1982 - Today, 06:57 AM
-
Baseball Rules QuizSpencer - Yesterday, 04:49 PM
-
Cubs v. Cardinals - June 18, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 02:45 PM
-
Pure awesomnessCubbie Blues - Yesterday, 11:31 AM
-
5 Reasons To Keep Watching the Cubs in 2013Oswego Chris - Yesterday, 09:24 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Around the League: Huge Stories Brewing, Including PED Suspensions and a Monopoly Lawsuit
Today, 11:55 AM - Chicago Cubs in on Another Cuban Defector, Dalier Hinojosa – Plus an Update on Miguel Alfredo Gonzalez
Today, 10:40 AM - Chicago Cubs Sign Undrafted Free Agent Josh Davis
Today, 09:30 AM - Cuban Signee Armando Rivero Set to Make Debut with Kane County This Week
Today, 08:34 AM - The Cardinals Way is Sliding High, Wide, and Late and Other Bullets
Today, 07:21 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Marmol for Peter Bourjois
#2
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:01 AM
http://losangeles.an...ws_ana&c_id=ana
...but they seem to be interested in a proven starter. I hate to say it, but what about Garza for Bourjois and a prospect package?
#3
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:31 PM
The FO may like 3B Andrew Romine better-a little less power than Jimenez, but takes more walks and better glove. Bats left, hits lefties equally well.
Kole Calhoun would be a good OF prospect to pick up, too. He's #5 on the Angels' prospect list. Lefty, big boy.
Yeah, I wouldn't want Peter Bourjos, when all of these guys are blocked and have better, potential offensive futures. We already have 3-4 defensive specialists that only hit .225, we don't need any more.
#4
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:46 PM
I'd be happy with bourjos for marmot! Bourjos is just 25 and might find better success in the national league and, as you mentioned, he plays solid d and has speed.
#6
Posted 23 December 2012 - 10:57 AM
Angels have interest with attempted Haren deal, moved Jordan Walden already, have too many outfielders as is, and Bourjois can fly....and he's from Park Ridge *bonus* Here's your starting CF to compete with Jackson/Sappelt.
If that's the best we can do for Marmol,then hang on to him until the trade deadline, if his first half matches his 2012 second half then his value increases greatly.
#7
Posted 23 December 2012 - 12:37 PM
If that's the best we can do for Marmol,then hang on to him until the trade deadline, if his first half matches his 2012 second half then his value increases greatly.
Totally agree. Marmol is not the bum that so many think he is. Guy still has one of the best sliders in the game and his fastball isn't horrible. We so quickly forget how dominant this guy was at one time. Yes - he has control issues, but he's got good enough stuff that he's certainly worth hanging on to rather than just give him away for a second tier starter or bench player.
Worst case scenario, we use him as a middle reliever in spot situations, but he showed last year that he's still capable of closing.
#8
Posted 23 December 2012 - 09:01 PM
I can live with that. But I am one of those people who firmly believe that Garza has to throw and prove that he can throw well in ST before we get any serious offers for him. But if that is what happens, I can definitely live with that.The Angels site mentions a lot of possibilities:
http://losangeles.an...ws_ana&c_id=ana
...but they seem to be interested in a proven starter. I hate to say it, but what about Garza for Bourjois and a prospect package?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).









