Steamers likes Cubs pitching prospects better than hitters this year
udbrky - Mar 04 2014 12:06 PM
Cubs vs. Cubs - February 26, 2014 (TV: your imagination)
TWC - Feb 26 2014 11:27 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Minor League Camp Notes: Jimenez, Paniagua, Concepcion, Dunston, Balaguert, More
Yesterday, 05:45 PM
- Spring Training Miscellany: Cubs 0, Indians 1 – March 6, 2014
Yesterday, 04:53 PM
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Indians (2:05 CT) – Lineup, Broadcast Info, etc. (Almora in CF, Barney at SS)
Yesterday, 12:48 PM
- Convalescence Watch: Arrieta, Castro, Russell, Olt
Yesterday, 11:35 AM
- Sammy Sosa: When is He Coming Back? Is There a Market Advantage?
Yesterday, 10:01 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
The Matt Garza Saga
Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:57 AM
Why, as a Cubs fan, do I have to temper my excitement for Matt Garza's ability, because such an investment would be short-term?
The Cubs most glaring hole, going forward, is quality starting pitchers, in their prime. Such pitchers will be necessary for the Cubs to become competitive, come 2014. So why, amongst the disappointment of missing out on Anibal Sanchez; the whispers of overpaying for average starters; and the looming crapshoot of the 2013, free-agent market; why isn't EXTENDING Matt Garza a top priority?
Let's get the "no shit" portion of this post out of the way. The Cubs will not get back anything close to what they paid for Garza(Lee, Archer). Garza's peak value has come and gone, with the unfortunate timing of his injury being the main culprit. Trading him now, would be settling for pennies on the dollar.
With Garza's value, thanks to his injury, at the lowest it will be for a while. Why not buy-low on a player we already have? Why not use Garza's currently lowered value, to sign him at a friendly, long-term extension?
Amongst the noisy traffic of trade chatter, fans are far too willing to part with known commodities for the allure of the "can't miss prospect". Sometime we forget that the player we are so willing to unload is a pretty good player. Sometimes we forget that Matt Garza is a really good pitcher!
Posted 19 December 2012 - 03:47 PM
Posted 20 December 2012 - 12:25 AM
1) Garza had talks last season with the Cubs. Money was reasonable and length was if I rember right was 3 yrs., also reasonable IMO. The hang up? Garza asking for full no trade. Talks were discontuined.
If kept and not able to reach an agreement he walks as a free agent returning no value to the team .
2) Lee/Archer is out of the equasion. 3 years of Garga was needed at the time of the trade(one in the hand worth two in the bush type of thing).
Lee/Archer may be coming into their own maybe not.
3) I don't see buying low on Garza. After seeing the other free agent pitchers sighn for $ Garza's agent knowes what his value is and will squeeze every penney.
I have no problem extending Garza for another three to four years. If he continues to demand no trade then all bets are off.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).