Recent Topics
-
-
OK Cub fans, how would you score this one?5412 - Today, 07:19 PM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 19, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 08:00 AM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 18, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 09:57 AM
-
Getting to stud pitchers earlycjdubbya - May 17 2013 12:49 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Off-Day Q & A Tomorrow at 1pm CT on Twitter and Facebook
Today, 05:42 PM - Cubs Reportedly Going to DFA Michael Bowden to Make Room for Matt Garza on Tuesday
Today, 04:15 PM - Enhanced Box Score: Mets 4, Cubs 3 – May 19, 2013
Today, 03:30 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Mets v. Cubs (1:20 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 10:28 AM - This Week In The Minors: Still Checking Up
Today, 08:39 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
-
gratefulled (36)
Cubs Calendar 12/20/12 - MVP
#5
Posted 20 December 2012 - 08:00 AM
Do you have any idea what modern statistical measures say about the three players that year?Ernie had great years, and not to be sacrilegious, but...
Milwaukee teammates Hank Aaron and Eddie Mathews finished 2nd and 3rd and took votes away from each other in 1959. Aaron kind of got screwed I think. He finished 3rd.
#6
Posted 20 December 2012 - 08:20 AM
Banks: .970, 156
Aaron: 1.037; 182
Aaron was of course a better baserunner, though he hadn't stole a lot of bases at that point or in that season (8 SB, 0 CS). Banks of course played SS which is big.
Fangraphs says Aaron's WAR was 9.0, while Ernie's was 10.4... advantage, Banks!
Addendum: In 1958 Willie Mays had a WAR of 10.7 to Ernie's 9.7. And in 1965, Mays had a WAR value of 11.5. Not too shabby.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










