Recent Topics
-
Cubs v. Cardinals - June 19, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 01:08 PM
-
Cubs Calendar - 6/19 - Run Homehansman1982 - Yesterday, 06:57 AM
-
Baseball Rules QuizSpencer - Jun 18 2013 04:49 PM
-
Cubs v. Cardinals - June 18, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Jun 18 2013 02:45 PM
-
Pure awesomnessCubbie Blues - Jun 18 2013 11:31 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 1, Cardinals 4 – June 19, 2013
Yesterday, 09:16 PM - Chicago Cubs Sign 3rd Rounder Jacob Hannemann for $1 Million, Which is Well Over Slot
Yesterday, 04:59 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Cardinals (7:15 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 03:55 PM - Astros Officially Sign Top Pick Mark Appel for $6.35 Million – Well Below Slot
Yesterday, 12:40 PM - Around the League: Huge Stories Brewing, Including PED Suspensions and a Monopoly Lawsuit
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
-
MightyBear (50)
-
YTOWNCubsFan (32)
Please no more Justin Upton to the Cubs ideas...
#1
Posted 09 January 2013 - 11:51 AM
#2
Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:05 AM
#3
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:44 PM
#4
Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:10 PM
#5
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:39 AM
Good points, but it just seems inevitable that we will have to give up the farm for him if we want to get him. That is really my concern. I am not buying any of the rumors out on him about his attitude because we don't really know, just more of a he said she said kind of thing there.I'm gonna have to disagree with all three of you. At 25 he is still a guy you can build around and he has a decent contract. I'm not buying the bad attitude argument (remember Castro has had make-up issues as well) but that is just my opinion. As far as stats, the big knock on him was that he was awful last year even though he put up a 280/355/430 line which is in no way horrible plus he was playing with a thumb injury that likely hampered his Slug%. On top of that his BB% went up and his BABIP and K% stayed basically steady. He is still one of the few guys that offered 30-30 potential (more likely 30-20) while playing average D. I agree to not giving the farm but anything that could get done without having to give up Baez I think is a no-brainer. Just too much potential to not jump in my opinion
#6
Posted 11 January 2013 - 05:37 AM
#7
Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:25 AM
I think this is all rendered irrelevant when he has the Cubs listed under his no trade clause. He already vetoed one to Seattle which is telling considering that they're a noncontender but closer to contention than the Cubs (both offenses are gonna be putrid but Seattle has a better staff as it stands). I doubt he'd go to a worse team even though he'd put up better offensive numbers at Wrigley
I think the Cubs being on this list is just a leverage play since they seem to be into the whole buy low thing, but with that being said unless Garza/Shark are involved i dont think the Cubs have the arms to get a deal done. They could offer solid hitting specs but if the Dbacks want at least solid arms back the Cubs have no shot. Im shocked they turned down Olt + Holland, but they must trust Chris Johnson more than most people.
With the newfound rotation depth would a Garza-spec for Upton deal be a good move for the Cubs? No idea if the Dbacks have interest but I'd take a shot if i was in Theo's shoes
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










