Recent Topics
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - Yesterday, 09:49 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 21, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 03:38 PM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/21/2013 - Tuesday Three-Ferhansman1982 - Yesterday, 07:32 AM
-
Cub greats robbed of Home Runs & other triviaOCCubFan - May 20 2013 02:16 PM
-
Series She-View: May 21 - May 23, Cubs @ Pirateshansman1982 - May 20 2013 01:59 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 4, Pirates 5 – May 21, 2013
Yesterday, 08:37 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 03:45 PM - As Expected, Cubs DFA Michael Bowden to Make Room For Matt Garza
Yesterday, 01:54 PM - Chicago Cubs Claim Reliever Eduardo Sanchez Off Waivers from Cardinals
Yesterday, 12:49 PM - Gentle, but Forceful, Reminder: Sign Up for the $300 BN Fantasy Contest
Yesterday, 11:57 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Cubs Calendar - 2/20/13 - Comeback Mountain
#2
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:21 AM
It was a 9 run deficit they overcame and they won the division that year. It couldn't have been 84, so it must have been 1989. Score was... don't remember, so I'll guess 12-11.
#3
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:23 AM
I remember watching that game. I wonder why I wasn't working - it was a day game at Wrigley. They kept showing some fan was holding up a (revised) card that showed how many more runs they needed...
It was a 9 run deficit they overcame and they won the division that year. It couldn't have been 84, so it must have been 1989. Score was... don't remember, so I'll guess 12-11.
Jesus H. Crimeny Jones - 9 runs is correct, 1989 is correct.
Score was wrong therefore:
LOSER!!!! DO NOT PASS GO!
#7
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:32 AM
Was it really 89? I remember that game, too. Wasn't it 9-1 at one point before they pulled out a 10-9 victory?
10-9 is correct. The calendar states the deficit was 9 runs on August 29, 1989.
Here is the box score: http://www.baseball-...198908290.shtml
After 5 it was 9-0, then the Cubs scored 2 in the 6th, 3 in the 7th and 4 in the 8th to tie it. In the 10th Dave Smith singled in Jerome Walton on a bases loaded hit to RF.
#8
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:42 AM
I was thinking it was 9-0. I was assuming the Astros scored another run or two. Maybe not? Doesn't seem liek there were a lot of homers that game. Just a lot of hits. I think either Walton or Dwight Smith knocked in the winning run.
It scares me how much knowledge you have of the Cubs.
Thanks to TWC for reminding me on Twitter that I had to do this today...thanks to Spriggs for getting the question 2/3rds correct. Thanks to my employer for giving me internet to use at work. Thank you to my Secret Santa for giving me the calendar. Thank you to all the little people...
#9
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:47 AM
I was thinking it was 9-0. I was assuming the Astros scored another run or two. Maybe not? Doesn't seem liek there were a lot of homers that game. Just a lot of hits. I think either Walton or Dwight Smith knocked in the winning run.
It scares me how much knowledge you have of the Cubs.
Thanks to TWC for reminding me on Twitter that I had to do this today...thanks to Spriggs for getting the question 2/3rds correct. Thanks to my employer for giving me internet to use at work. Thank you to my Secret Santa for giving me the calendar. Thank you to all the little people...
Nicely done, Hans! Phil could be the new Wally Pipp!
#10
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:48 AM
Walton and Smith had nice rookie seasons that year. I was sky high on those two guys.
Was it really 89? I remember that game, too. Wasn't it 9-1 at one point before they pulled out a 10-9 victory?
10-9 is correct. The calendar states the deficit was 9 runs on August 29, 1989.
Here is the box score: http://www.baseball-...198908290.shtml
After 5 it was 9-0, then the Cubs scored 2 in the 6th, 3 in the 7th and 4 in the 8th to tie it. In the 10th Dave Smith singled in Jerome Walton on a bases loaded hit to RF.
#11
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:56 AM
Joe would only have to do it for another 2,129 more days.Walton and Smith had nice rookie seasons that year. I was sky high on those two guys.
Was it really 89? I remember that game, too. Wasn't it 9-1 at one point before they pulled out a 10-9 victory?
10-9 is correct. The calendar states the deficit was 9 runs on August 29, 1989.
Here is the box score: http://www.baseball-...198908290.shtml
After 5 it was 9-0, then the Cubs scored 2 in the 6th, 3 in the 7th and 4 in the 8th to tie it. In the 10th Dave Smith singled in Jerome Walton on a bases loaded hit to RF.
#12
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:57 AM
Was it really 89? I remember that game, too. Wasn't it 9-1 at one point before they pulled out a 10-9 victory?
10-9 is correct. The calendar states the deficit was 9 runs on August 29, 1989.
Here is the box score: http://www.baseball-...198908290.shtml
That box score is a trip. Tuesday afternoon, probably the first week of school, eighth grade, which means I would have gotten home in PERFECT TIME to see innings 6-10.
Also: wow, Rafael Ramirez -- 3-for-5 w/ 7 RBIs? Dang.
#14
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:59 AM
Joe would only have to do it for another 2,129 more days.
Walton and Smith had nice rookie seasons that year. I was sky high on those two guys.
Was it really 89? I remember that game, too. Wasn't it 9-1 at one point before they pulled out a 10-9 victory?
10-9 is correct. The calendar states the deficit was 9 runs on August 29, 1989.
Here is the box score: http://www.baseball-...198908290.shtml
After 5 it was 9-0, then the Cubs scored 2 in the 6th, 3 in the 7th and 4 in the 8th to tie it. In the 10th Dave Smith singled in Jerome Walton on a bases loaded hit to RF.
haha!! Yep!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










