If Cano reaches free agency, it means that the Yankees offer of 7 years and 170 million wasn't good enough. Which means that the reports that he's looking for a 10 year contract similar to what Pujols got isn't as far fetched as we were lead to believe. I'm sure the Dodgers, or some other desperate to win now team will be willing to indulge him, but I can't see the Cubs being willing to give that many years/dollars to a guy in his 30's.It was just reported that contract talks / extension talks are off for the rest of the season (like Pujols in '11).
Cano will reach free agency in 2014.
Recent Topics
-
Another way to show just how improbable this season is.DocPeterWimsey - Today, 08:33 PM
-
Brett's New Favorite WebsiteLuke - Today, 07:14 PM
-
I hope they don't draft Appel even if they have a shot5412 - Today, 01:20 PM
-
Cubs v. Reds - May 24, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 11:43 AM
-
Series She-View: Cubs v. Reds, May 24 - May 26Brett - Today, 07:25 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Reds (6:10 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 03:23 PM - This Is It: You’ve Got Three Hours Left to Join the Free BN Fantasy Contest to Win Cash Money, Honey
Today, 02:00 PM - Cubs Draft Notes: Appel and Gray Still at the Top, Manaea Falling, Youngest Prospects, Draft Details
Today, 12:48 PM - Miguel Cabrera and Drew Sheppard Are Ridiculous
Today, 11:40 AM - Kinda Sounds Like Alfonso Soriano is Ready to Accept a Trade
Today, 10:24 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Robinson Cano???
#16
Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:41 AM
#17
Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:57 AM
It was just reported that contract talks / extension talks are off for the rest of the season (like Pujols in '11).
Cano will reach free agency in 2014.
In all likelihood, the Yankees will re-sign Cano. But let's say they don't. Why would the Cubs want to saddle themselves with a long-term, expensive contract, over the course of a player's declining years? Isn't that exactly what the Cubs' new administration is looking to avoid doing?
Whoever signs Cano, they'll be paying him a ridiculous amount of money based on what he was, rather than what he will be.
#18
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:01 AM
It was just reported that contract talks / extension talks are off for the rest of the season (like Pujols in '11).
Cano will reach free agency in 2014.
In all likelihood, the Yankees will re-sign Cano. But let's say they don't. Why would the Cubs want to saddle themselves with a long-term, expensive contract, over the course of a player's declining years? Isn't that exactly what the Cubs' new administration is looking to avoid doing?
Whoever signs Cano, they'll be paying him a ridiculous amount of money based on what he was, rather than what he will be.
Exactly!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).











