In today's game, the Cubs just touched up young Mets phenom Matt Harvey for two runs in the first inning, which got me to thinking, "Hey, it's good that the Cubs got to him early before he calms down." I'm appealing to baseball minds smarter than I - is this actually a thing? Would love to hear conjecture or statistical analysis below.
Selling any non-Yankee and non-Cardinals game for Face Value
NorthSideIrish - Yesterday, 10:03 AM
Steamers likes Cubs pitching prospects better than hitters this year
udbrky - Mar 04 2014 12:06 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Spring Training Miscellany: Cubs 3, Angels 2; Indians 7, Cubs 2 – March 7, 2014
Yesterday, 05:17 PM
- SchadenfReds: Brandon Phillips Says Silly Things
Yesterday, 02:06 PM
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Angels, Indians v. Cubs (2:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 12:47 PM
- Were the Cubs Terrible at Defensive Shifts Last Year?
Yesterday, 11:28 AM
- Prospect Notes: Olt, Soler, Geiger, Rosters
Yesterday, 10:05 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Getting to stud pitchers early
Posted 17 May 2013 - 02:47 PM
I think this is the Tom Glavine effect. He was constantly in trouble early in games, only to turn it around and pitch lights out the rest of the way.
He had a 4.58 era in first innings, and somewhere in the low 3.00s the rest of the way.
Harvey seems to have similar issues, but he's got so little experience, so it's hard to compare.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).