Just doing an informal quick glance, I think I'm noticing something that strikes me as a bit odd.
The people who are more likely to put more value in traditional statistics (BA, W-L etc.) also seem to be more likely to suggest the Cubs should leave Wrigley field, and the people who prefer more modern statistical interpretations seem to see the Cubs as uniquely entwined with the ivy-covered Friendly Confines.
It seems on the surface like a tug between modernization and tradition that exists in all of us, but I think deep down it's pretty logical.
Am I wrong?