Recent Topics
-
Another way to show just how improbable this season is.DocPeterWimsey - Today, 08:33 PM
-
Brett's New Favorite WebsiteLuke - Today, 07:14 PM
-
I hope they don't draft Appel even if they have a shot5412 - Today, 01:20 PM
-
Cubs v. Reds - May 24, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 11:43 AM
-
Series She-View: Cubs v. Reds, May 24 - May 26Brett - Today, 07:25 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 4, Reds 7 – May 24, 2013
Today, 08:36 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Reds (6:10 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 03:23 PM - This Is It: You’ve Got Three Hours Left to Join the Free BN Fantasy Contest to Win Cash Money, Honey
Today, 02:00 PM - Cubs Draft Notes: Appel and Gray Still at the Top, Manaea Falling, Youngest Prospects, Draft Details
Today, 12:48 PM - Miguel Cabrera and Drew Sheppard Are Ridiculous
Today, 11:40 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
New Stats and an old dog... (BABIP)
#1
Posted 29 December 2011 - 10:50 AM
This is what I understand so far,
If a player's BABIP swings way out of career norm it should come back. It will typically be between .275 and .300. If a batter has a career year, but his BABIP is .350, he probably had a lucky year.
So what if a pitcher has a BABIP of about .340 for his minor league career? Does that mean he's just a bad pitcher or that he has had bad d behind him his whole career?
I can see using peripherals to predict stats, but I'm not sure how Bill James predicts BABIP. How does that work?
#2
Posted 29 December 2011 - 01:13 PM
Anyway, main points:
Minor League BABIP is generally taken very lightly, both because of the defensive issues you mentioned but also because of the nature of prospects. Brett Jackson put up something near a .400 BABIP in AAA last year. Is that because he was lucky, or because he was mashing inferior pitching? It's really tough to make that distinction. However, on the other side of the spectrum, a guy posting a .200 BABIP is probably awful, but he probably also got lucky. Which raises the big problem of where guys in the middle are. Are they really good and unlucky, or really bad and unlucky. It's nigh impossible to get a feel for such things using stats, and that is where scouting comes in.
Predictions:
I think Bill James' predictions are based off of a weighted average of a players' last 4 or 5 years, but that might be ZIPS or tangotiger's...
Also, Beyond the Boxscore has a pretty nifty xBABIP write up (http://www.hardballt...ters-and-babip/)(expected BABIP. 'x' before a stat signifies expected, or predicted, values for a player, while a 'w' signifies a weighted version of a stat (usually weighted against league averages and such)). The formula is written as such:
xBABIP = 0.392 + (LD% x 0.287709436) + ((GB% – (GB% * IFH%)) x -0.152 ) + ((FB% – (FB% x HR/FB%) – (FB% x IFFB%)) x -0.188) + ((IFFB% * FB%) x -0.835) + ((IFH% * GB%) x 0.500)
so, yea, peripherals can be used fairly accurately to predict a hitter's BABIP. I'd imagine the same process can be applied to find a pitcher's, but then the issue of each pitcher having the same defense behind them at all times comes up.
SORRY FOR THE ESSAY hope some of it was intelligible
#3
Posted 29 December 2011 - 06:51 PM
#6
Posted 30 December 2011 - 06:56 AM
#8
Posted 30 December 2011 - 07:38 AM
In all seriousness the local community college offers a class on baseball saber metrics and I'm think I take it next summer, since I required to take 10 credit hours by 2015 to keep my teaching license and I hope that qualifies.
Damn! Wish the Continuing Ed requirements for insurance license included sabremetrics! I actually have to take insurance related crap.
#9
Posted 30 December 2011 - 07:48 AM
All I have to do is get my principal to sign off and write a couple pages on how I could use it in the classroom. Lots of words like differentiation and interdisciplinary and I'm golden, not to mention my principal is a huge Cub fan.
In all seriousness the local community college offers a class on baseball saber metrics and I'm think I take it next summer, since I required to take 10 credit hours by 2015 to keep my teaching license and I hope that qualifies.
Damn! Wish the Continuing Ed requirements for insurance license included sabremetrics! I actually have to take insurance related crap.
#11
Posted 30 December 2011 - 11:15 AM
Indeed. I've been waiting for a slow stretch to dig into my "long-term" ideas pile, but it's been relatively busy - which is surprising, given how little the Cubs have actually done.It might be worth putting together a little series on some of the sabermetric concepts I use on the blog. I think I'll look into doing that.
Good writing for slow news days.
#12
Posted 30 December 2011 - 07:10 PM
Well, if you get really bored, you could finally drop that Bartman essay on us. You know, the one you threatened us with, then quietly bailed on?! AHEM!Indeed. I've been waiting for a slow stretch to dig into my "long-term" ideas pile, but it's been relatively busy - which is surprising, given how little the Cubs have actually done.
It might be worth putting together a little series on some of the sabermetric concepts I use on the blog. I think I'll look into doing that.
Good writing for slow news days.
#13
Posted 30 December 2011 - 07:22 PM
Oh, ya, I have two long-term series' that are currently on the side burner and your idea was in the microwave defrosting waiting for January but as it seems the entire league is moving slowly, who knows. Maybe off day fodder during the season.Indeed. I've been waiting for a slow stretch to dig into my "long-term" ideas pile, but it's been relatively busy - which is surprising, given how little the Cubs have actually done.
It might be worth putting together a little series on some of the sabermetric concepts I use on the blog. I think I'll look into doing that.
Good writing for slow news days.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).











