Recent Topics
-
I hope they don't draft Appel even if they have a shot5412 - Today, 01:20 PM
-
Cubs v. Reds - May 24, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 11:43 AM
-
Series She-View: Cubs v. Reds, May 24 - May 26Brett - Today, 07:25 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/24/2013 - No-Hitterhansman1982 - Today, 07:09 AM
-
Adrian CardenasCrockett - Yesterday, 09:54 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Reds (6:10 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 03:23 PM - This Is It: You’ve Got Three Hours Left to Join the Free BN Fantasy Contest to Win Cash Money, Honey
Today, 02:00 PM - Cubs Draft Notes: Appel and Gray Still at the Top, Manaea Falling, Youngest Prospects, Draft Details
Today, 12:48 PM - Miguel Cabrera and Drew Sheppard Are Ridiculous
Today, 11:40 AM - Kinda Sounds Like Alfonso Soriano is Ready to Accept a Trade
Today, 10:24 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
BadNews
#1
Posted 17 January 2012 - 09:07 PM
"Ok BetterNews I want to calmly and clearly state why so many of us are on your case about your “crystal ball” and the nature of your posts.
1-To say Garza should not be moved because it makes sense is a perfect response that many of us can agree. Garza is a top pitcher that makes the Cubs better, no doubt. But until this post you always said it in a indisputable, totalitarian manner. “Write it down Garza will not be traded” and similar definitive response are unjustifiable. Theo himself has said the Cubs are listening and the national media has confirmed that talks have happened, yet you continue to post daily on multiple occasions that Garza will absolutely not be traded.
2-If we challenge you, you be combative. Why? Most of us encourage civil debate but you seem to want people to agree with you and when challenged you pout and get angry. Instead of becoming hostile clearly give your reasons and avoid getting aggressive and personal.
3-We are hard on you because you continue to avoid civil discourse and talk in absolutes.
I am done trying to engage you until you make an effort to be more civil, and I and many of us will actively ignore you if you continue to make unconfirmed absolute statements. You are welcome to be here, and I (and many of us here) wish you see this critism as constructive.
Take care."
#4
Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:42 PM
Secondly - I feel your pain and frustration. diehard was driving me nuts and it was suggested that I just ignore him. I find I sleep much better at night now that I'm taking that advice.
#9
Posted 18 January 2012 - 09:24 AM
"We won a game yesterday. If we win one today, that’s two in a row. We win one tomorrow, that’s called a winning streak. It HAS happened before." - Lou Brown
#12
Posted 18 January 2012 - 10:23 AM
#13
Posted 18 January 2012 - 10:28 AM
I know it was a fuckup and all, but the old message board with the concurrent posts was a novel idea. Too bad it wasn't functional. It nearly brought the intertubes to their knees!And, as I've said before: to the extent you guys want to start threads here that mirror the content on the front page (so you can be discussing the same stuff, in parallel, but without the intrusions), by all means, go ahead.
#15
Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:45 PM
I think about it all the time, actually ... makes me sad it didn't work (and I've since learned it was never going to work).I know it was a fuckup and all, but the old message board with the concurrent posts was a novel idea. Too bad it wasn't functional. It nearly brought the intertubes to their knees!
And, as I've said before: to the extent you guys want to start threads here that mirror the content on the front page (so you can be discussing the same stuff, in parallel, but without the intrusions), by all means, go ahead.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).











