Recent Topics
-
A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My BookOswego Chris - Yesterday, 03:46 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 22, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Yesterday, 02:49 PM
-
Darwin Barney, BABIP, and xBAPIPCaleb - Yesterday, 10:07 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/22/2013 - 21hansman1982 - Yesterday, 08:33 AM
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - May 21 2013 09:49 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 0, Pirates 1 – May 22, 2013
Yesterday, 08:07 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 04:01 PM - Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Yesterday, 01:59 PM - Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Yesterday, 01:41 PM - The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Yesterday, 12:02 PM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
La Fox?
#2
Posted 09 September 2011 - 09:10 AM
#3
Posted 09 September 2011 - 12:13 PM
The hole theory is exactly what I suspect. While it could be poor evaluation on the part of any number of organizations who've taken a look at him (obviously the longest and closest being the Mariners and Cubs), I tend to think a guy doesn't simply get "missed" while putting up those kind of numbers at AAA for so many years. The Cubs know something we don't.Or maybe Hoff, It's possible, I still wonder why he has been the minors for so long? I suspect the Cubs see a hole in his game and expect other teams to eventually exploit that hole (yes that is a funny statement). He did exceed anything Fox or the Hoff did in AAA. Time will tell but he is already a fan favorite for 1B next year.
#4
Posted 09 September 2011 - 12:25 PM
#5
Posted 09 September 2011 - 12:31 PM
The hole theory is exactly what I suspect. While it could be poor evaluation on the part of any number of organizations who've taken a look at him (obviously the longest and closest being the Mariners and Cubs), I tend to think a guy doesn't simply get "missed" while putting up those kind of numbers at AAA for so many years. The Cubs know something we don't.
Or maybe Hoff, It's possible, I still wonder why he has been the minors for so long? I suspect the Cubs see a hole in his game and expect other teams to eventually exploit that hole (yes that is a funny statement). He did exceed anything Fox or the Hoff did in AAA. Time will tell but he is already a fan favorite for 1B next year.
Well could SOMEONE please tell us what the hell his problem is so that we can all stop entertaining him as the future of first base?
#6
Posted 09 September 2011 - 12:47 PM
Well as soon as we let him have first base or an OF spot and proclaim him a starter, MLB pitching will show us his weakness, but the fans will say he needs more time. I'm seeing the same thing in Colvin.
The hole theory is exactly what I suspect. While it could be poor evaluation on the part of any number of organizations who've taken a look at him (obviously the longest and closest being the Mariners and Cubs), I tend to think a guy doesn't simply get "missed" while putting up those kind of numbers at AAA for so many years. The Cubs know something we don't.
Or maybe Hoff, It's possible, I still wonder why he has been the minors for so long? I suspect the Cubs see a hole in his game and expect other teams to eventually exploit that hole (yes that is a funny statement). He did exceed anything Fox or the Hoff did in AAA. Time will tell but he is already a fan favorite for 1B next year.
Well could SOMEONE please tell us what the hell his problem is so that we can all stop entertaining him as the future of first base?
#7
Posted 09 September 2011 - 01:33 PM
Well as soon as we let him have first base or an OF spot and proclaim him a starter, MLB pitching will show us his weakness, but the fans will say he needs more time. I'm seeing the same thing in Colvin.
The hole theory is exactly what I suspect. While it could be poor evaluation on the part of any number of organizations who've taken a look at him (obviously the longest and closest being the Mariners and Cubs), I tend to think a guy doesn't simply get "missed" while putting up those kind of numbers at AAA for so many years. The Cubs know something we don't.
Or maybe Hoff, It's possible, I still wonder why he has been the minors for so long? I suspect the Cubs see a hole in his game and expect other teams to eventually exploit that hole (yes that is a funny statement). He did exceed anything Fox or the Hoff did in AAA. Time will tell but he is already a fan favorite for 1B next year.
Well could SOMEONE please tell us what the hell his problem is so that we can all stop entertaining him as the future of first base?
My guess is that the Cubs hadn't promoted LeHair earlier because they had high priced veterans on the major league club at all the positions he can play. Promoting him earlier (when he was blasting all those home runs in the minors) would have signaled that they were rebuilding. Unfortunately, the Cubs don't rebuild, they "compete" (aka "try to stay good enough to win a weak division").
If a hitter's Herculean stats from the PCL league don't mean anything because it's some kind of Coorsesque hitter's paradise, then why bother sending prospects there at all? Push the outfield fence back or something so that we can tell if these huge offensive binges from Fox and LeHair mean something.
I have absolutely no idea if LeHair is any good, but the Cubs could have had him at first base in August and maybe we would know by now instead of clutching his PCL stats close to our hearts all off season and hoping he's our true love.
#9
Posted 10 September 2011 - 08:00 PM
#11
Posted 13 September 2011 - 01:04 PM
The Hoffpauir comparison is the most obvious and could end up being true, but I stand by the fact that LaHair’s numbers progressed more consistently at AAA than Hoffpauir’s did. Plus I think we’re getting a hungry player in LaHair that is seriously peaking, hasn’t had a number of call-ups/send downs to mess with his head, and is trying to get another chance after his Seattle opportunity was affected by a foot injury. Plus, the poor condition of the team presents a scenario that favors a guy like LaHair, since the new GM may opt to spend first-base free agent money in other areas, thus giving him that chance he covets.
Fox (fighting for time with Soto – he was a catching prospect, Soriano and Ramirez), Hoffpauir (D Lee and Soriano again), and Dubois (Matt Murton and yes . .Todd Hollandsworth) were considered more expendable due to more log jams at their positions on teams that weren’t quite as bad.
On the other hand, if the Cubs plan to sign Pujols or Fielder, then all this talk about LaHair is moot anyways.
#15
Posted 14 September 2011 - 06:32 PM
I can count at least $18 million on the Cubs without thinking...How many millions of dollars are spent this year on players with holes in their swings?
My guess: $31,000,000
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










