Recent Topics
-
A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My BookOswego Chris - Yesterday, 03:46 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 22, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Yesterday, 02:49 PM
-
Darwin Barney, BABIP, and xBAPIPCaleb - Yesterday, 10:07 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/22/2013 - 21hansman1982 - Yesterday, 08:33 AM
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - May 21 2013 09:49 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 0, Pirates 1 – May 22, 2013
Yesterday, 08:07 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 04:01 PM - Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Yesterday, 01:59 PM - Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Yesterday, 01:41 PM - The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Yesterday, 12:02 PM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Are Theo and Jed Fixin' to be Lucky or Good?
#1
Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:55 AM
If it just so happens that Ian Stewart stays healthy and fulfills the promise of his high prospect designations by crushing it this year; if Bryan LaHair, it turns out, really is a different player and can keep on hitting; if Chris Volstad, like Stewart, emerges as the stud his pedigree says he should have been; if David DeJesus bounces back and puts up a .350+ OBP...
Say all that happens - do we conclude that Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer are geniuses, and knocked those decisions out of the park because they're so good at this?
Or would that kind of success just a matter of luck?
Both?
#3
Posted 20 March 2012 - 11:27 AM
#5
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:14 PM
Career type years for all of these guys at the same time would have to be considered some sort of luck. But, at the same time, we will owe them credit for having the forethought to get guys with some upside rather than overspending on guys like Rami simply to justify "not mailing it in."
#6
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:19 PM
So, it kind of sounds like you're saying "lucky."If you look at the sum of all the moves mentioned, I don't believe that the greater idea that Theo and Jed had at the time was to make the Cubs into contenders this year, or any year with this nucleus really. I think they're all low risk type of guys like the others have pointed out that you use to fill a roster on the cheap while doing all the other things (drafting, signing the right free agents to larger or longer term deals) that they want to accomplish.
Career type years for all of these guys at the same time would have to be considered some sort of luck. But, at the same time, we will owe them credit for having the forethought to get guys with some upside rather than overspending on guys like Rami simply to justify "not mailing it in."
(And you've also touched on the thought that was animating my question - if all of these things happen, isn't it primarily "luck," given our suspicion that Theo and Jed weren't trying to build a powerhouse this year?)
#7
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:15 PM
Clear as mud?
#11
Posted 21 March 2012 - 11:06 AM
I feel that if we asked them we would get something like "I don't believe in luck, only opportunity". Therefore, I pick option D, opportunistic.
#12
Posted 21 March 2012 - 11:32 AM
I just have my son, so it's not been an issue. Plus my wife is an avid Mustang nut, so I don't think any of mine are going anywhere!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










