Recent Topics
-
A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My BookOswego Chris - Today, 03:46 PM
-
Cubs v. Pirates - May 22, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 02:49 PM
-
Darwin Barney, BABIP, and xBAPIPCaleb - Today, 10:07 AM
-
Cubs Calendar - 5/22/2013 - 21hansman1982 - Today, 08:33 AM
-
Some thoughts on Baez5412 - Yesterday, 09:49 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (6:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 04:01 PM - Around the League: The Swift Fall of Albert Pujols, Barry Bonds on Miguel Cabrera, Instant Replay
Today, 01:59 PM - Try to Contain Your Frustration: Shawn Camp to the DL with an Injured Toe
Today, 01:41 PM - The Lineup That is Going to Crush You on Friday
Today, 12:02 PM - Matt Garza Impressed at Least One Scout Last Night, But There’s Still a Trading Hang-Up
Today, 10:17 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
Luke's Corner
#1
Posted 29 March 2012 - 10:01 AM
Don't feel compelled to ask just for the sake of asking, but if the mood should strike you, find this thread, and fire away.
#3
Posted 29 March 2012 - 11:32 AM
What are the rules, if any, about disagreeing with Luke in this specific thread? Should we take them to another thread? I just don't know if you/he want this one getting muddied with other opinions vs. just more of a Q/A for him.
Rule 462.32.B.%._.543 states:
YOU WILL NEVER, EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE DISAGREE WITH LUKE.
Rule 462.32.B.%._.543.A states:
Anyone caught disagreeing with Luke shall be drawn and quartered in the public square.
#5
Posted 29 March 2012 - 11:43 AM
And don't feel like all questions need to start here. Some questions are big enough to deserve their own thread initially, and feel free to create them. For example, if you want to ask about the Cubs starting lineup in 2015, that's probably a thread. If you want to tell me how horribly wrong I am for thinking that Matt Szczur is going to push Brett Jackson into right field, that's also probably a thread. If you want to ask what I think of Dallas Beeler, this might be good place to ask.
#8
Posted 29 March 2012 - 12:24 PM
What if I disagree with Hansman's disagreeable assessment of Crocket's potential disagreements with Luke?
Goodness, do you people think this is America where you can spout about anything you want? NO, this is Soviet BN - you don't disagree with BN, BN disagrees with you.
#9
Posted 29 March 2012 - 12:52 PM
#10
Posted 29 March 2012 - 05:24 PM
Damn I think we need to revise the bylaw so that sending me beers is a prerequisite of asking questions.Then I will remain -- as always -- agreeable.
What if I disagree with Hansman's disagreeable assessment of Crocket's potential disagreements with Luke?
I'm not sure, but I have a feeling it will involve buying Michigan Goat a beer.
#12
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:09 AM
Luke, the last Cub to come up from the farm and become a durable front end starter was Big Z. Which prospects have the potential to be the next top tier SP?
I'm going to define 'top tier' as a No. 1 or No. 2 starter - think Matt Garza. Top tier is often used to refer to the very elite pitchers like Verlander, but for the sake of this answer I'm going to widen the net a little.
Trey McNutt and Dillon Maples are the top two candidates, but both need to work on their off speed stuff. There are a number of other candidates who can pitch themselves into that status, but it is too early to project them to that level with any confidence just yet.
#13
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:00 AM
Luke, the last Cub to come up from the farm and become a durable front end starter was Big Z. Which prospects have the potential to be the next top tier SP?
I'm going to define 'top tier' as a No. 1 or No. 2 starter - think Matt Garza. Top tier is often used to refer to the very elite pitchers like Verlander, but for the sake of this answer I'm going to widen the net a little.
Trey McNutt and Dillon Maples are the top two candidates, but both need to work on their off speed stuff. There are a number of other candidates who can pitch themselves into that status, but it is too early to project them to that level with any confidence just yet.
I'd say you have McNutt and then...no one. Maples hasn't even registered any actual minor league innings yet, and coming into the draft he was considered to have one of the best curveballs in the draft. I don't think any legitimate opinions can be made until he pitches at least a year. I've only seen video of him pitching, and his delivery is...awful. I see him as a future RP.
#15
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:03 AM
I'd say you have McNutt and then...no one. Maples hasn't even registered any actual minor league innings yet, and coming into the draft he was considered to have one of the best curveballs in the draft. I don't think any legitimate opinions can be made until he pitches at least a year. I've only seen video of him pitching, and his delivery is...awful. I see him as a future RP.
I'm really surprised the Cubs did not decide to spend this past winter and the 2012 season reworking his delivery. I'm not sure why they are content to let him pitch with it, but that's the story I'm hearing.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










