Recent Topics
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 18, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 09:57 AM
-
Getting to stud pitchers earlycjdubbya - May 17 2013 12:49 PM
-
Avatar Contest for The Wifehansman1982 - May 17 2013 11:54 AM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 17, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - May 17 2013 11:04 AM
-
Is there any insight on John Andreoli?Rated Rookie - May 17 2013 10:05 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Enhanced Box Score: Mets 2, Cubs 8 – May 18, 2013
Yesterday, 02:06 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Mets v. Cubs (12:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 10:28 AM - Sweet: Matt Garza is Coming Back Next Week
Yesterday, 09:54 AM - Cubs Surveying Fans on How They’ll Use the Proposed Video Board at Wrigley Field
Yesterday, 08:56 AM - David Bell Explains His Bad Send Yesterday and Other Bullets
Yesterday, 08:02 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
-
gratefulled (36)
How Long will Honeymoon last for the Theotles?
#1
Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:28 AM
- a 3-10 record, 6 games back already
- 5 HRs in 13 games
- 5 guys striking out at a pace of at least once in every four at bats
- Soriano
- 2 good starters
- Camp, Lopez and Castillo on a major league team
Yuck. In the Theotles defense I really don't think there were that many opportunites out there to improve during the off-season. However I think if this keeps up, it might be fair for some to ask did they have to be this bad?
I am in for the long haul(hell, why give up now)...but I am just curious what all of the Cub fans on BN think...How long will the honeymoon period last? When will fans lose patience?
#2
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:19 AM
#3
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:23 AM
I am also "in" for the long haul. Hell, I've endured for so long already, and have experienced so many excruciatlingly awful lows, what's a few more decades? However, going in to this season, I still had some hope that even during this rebuilding, the Cubs would be better than last year - at least showing some improvement along the way. So far, that hope hasn't panned out, and is beginning to show definite signs of evaporation. The Cubs are quickly approaching the double-digits when looking at how many games they are out of the division lead. And are at or near the bottom of the league in several categories that the opposite is the goal (HRs, batting avg, etc). Additionally, the Cubs are leading (or near the top) of several other categories in which the lower totals are better (pitcher BBs, for example).
I think the patience quotient is going to be severly tested this year, and the benefit of the doubt levels granted to Theo and Co., will continue to drop. I've head the boo-birds are starting to trickle into the stadiums.
#4
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:30 AM
So, that will leave me on board this ship for a while.
#5
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:59 AM
You mean, the ones who haven't lost it already?Some fans will lose their shit by the end of May.
I with you, Philo (where you been, anyway?), and the rest of you. I remain a Cubs fan. I will still listen to the games. I will still throw things when they lose. And I will still tune in tomorrow. Because they will win it all. I'm pretty sure of that.I am in for the long haul(hell, why give up now)...but I am just curious what all of the Cub fans on BN think...How long will the honeymoon period last? When will fans lose patience?
I don't expect the Cubs to be that great this year, but the "ZOMG! AT THIS RATE THE CUBS ARE GONNA BE 37-125!" FAIL THEO FAIL FAIL FAIL!!!" is obnoxious. Is projections like that were even remotely valid, Bryan LaHair will end up with a .999 BABiP.
I expect much of the "Oh, Theo's here, time to be a Cubs fans again!" people will drop off the map/boards shortly. Some will return in June/July to peep out Rizzo and Jackson, and I believe that a few more will come back in September when, long out of the race, the kids put together a month-long series of good play against bad teams. We'll make some moves in the off-season, nothing major, really, and things will perk back up during Spring Training. If the first half of next season yields a 25-45 start, well, patience will be in short supply I think.
#6
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:59 AM
i think they could have done so much better than stewart and the jesus. although, admittedly, neither are part of the teams biggest problems. i just see them as a waste of time and money, even if its not a lot cash, relatively speaking.
to anyone who saw Maholm pitch last year, you knew he kind of blew. in fact, i would say the cubs terrible plate approach/philosophy was the biggest single factor in elevating his number to respectable last year (not really but we do suck against him). no one on this team can hit lefty slo-ballers.
I was unhappy about all of these ^ off-season moves, but I was giving them the benefit of the doubt. holding out hope, counting on them being geniuses, blah blah blah. But after a dozen plus games, they have lost that benefit. Its doubt from here on out. There is a slim chance that either stewart or dejesus turn out to be a club carrying monster, or that maholm learns how to pitch, or that some bullpen ace falls out of the sky, if that happens ill gladly admit to my stupidity and apologize.
I kind of suspected they were knowingly lying to us about being competitive in 2012. I hope so, because if not, it just means they arent as smart as they had been made out to be. i guess id rather have a liar than a dumby. wait, would i?
#7
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:03 AM
#8
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:07 AM
I just can't understand how people get hung up on this. We sent the Reds a great 60-inning pitcher who was about to be priced out of a job. If we had Marshall this season, we'd probably be 4-9. Sean Marshall was so very ver very much not the "rug" under the 2012 team. That rug was under the corner infielders, and it was yanked back in November/December.yeah, for me, its already over. the bullpen is atrocious. marshall for wood was a bad trade. if you're going to pull the rug out from under the 2012 club like that you better be damn sure you're getting something damn good. unnecessary gamble and a bet that they lost.
#10
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:23 AM
Some people are naturally going to lose their minds and be clamoring for a change this season, but, much like those extended family members you pretend you don't know when they try and say hi to you in a public setting, we'll pretend we can't hear them either.
#11
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:29 AM
They also never had a World Series birth "in the bag" or the best record in the NL in a long time either. That's not to say that I agree with the booing of course.Just what I was looking for...some good, focused opinions on the "patience level"...one problem that I see is the change of culture at Wrigley that happened in the 2000's...the rampant booing of Cubs...this never used to happen...
As far as that type of patience goes, I think it's already gone. Marlon Byrd goes 0-4 with 3 K's today and the boo birds will be out in full force. 2008 seems like a long time ago in some ways, but it set the bar unreasonably high and seeing a team with the kind of payroll that the Cubs have, people don't have any patience for this kind of worthless team that we trot out onto the field every day.
Do I think that means it's time to give up on the future? Absolutely not. Do I have any patience for this year's team? No, not really. I consider this a lost cause season.
#12
Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:09 AM
If, come 2014, we are still seeing a team cobbled together using a lot of failed former top prospects - then Bah Humbug and go Yankees!
#13
Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:44 AM
I look forward to what this franchise will look like in the next 2+ years, if Theo can walk the walk everyone talks for him, however, I think any long-time Cubs fan has to keep the word "cautious" in front of their optimism. Will we be better than the 2012 Cubs in 2013 and beyond? I think so, but I don't think that's saying anything of value; this team is horrid.
I'm done "believing" that 2012 will be anything other than multitudes of suck, but I'm not done believing that this is all part of a grander plan. Maybe they didn't expect it to be THIS bad (they=Theo & Co.), but if it was, they were cool with it because they have their plan in place. Here's hoping, right?
#14
Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:51 AM
But I'm pretty confident that hoping that those guys turned it around so that the Cubs could be a surprisingly competitive team was never in the plan.
#15
Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:54 AM
2014-2015 are my goals, I say that early because the franchise should have about 50-70m in payroll to blow on free agents for those years to fill in around Castro, Rizzo, Jackson, etc.
This being said, I am disappointed so far in Ian Stewart more than anyone. Really thought he'd bounce back from injury better than he has. Still looks totally lost against decent offspeed stuff. And while I am a big fan of Rizzo...not having Cashner is really proving to be an issue for the bullpen depth. More than I thought it would, to be honest.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










