Selling any non-Yankee and non-Cardinals game for Face Value
NorthSideIrish - Today, 10:03 AM
Steamers likes Cubs pitching prospects better than hitters this year
udbrky - Mar 04 2014 12:06 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Spring Training Miscellany: Cubs 3, Angels 2; Indians 7, Cubs 2 – March 7, 2014
Today, 05:17 PM
- SchadenfReds: Brandon Phillips Says Silly Things
Today, 02:06 PM
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Angels, Indians v. Cubs (2:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 12:47 PM
- Were the Cubs Terrible at Defensive Shifts Last Year?
Today, 11:28 AM
- Prospect Notes: Olt, Soler, Geiger, Rosters
Today, 10:05 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
OK... so Byrd is gone... I get it..
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:39 AM
Next came the reports out of the minor leagues that Jackson was having a good start to the season in AAA. And of course, at the same time, Marlon Byrd's struggles at the plat continued.
As people (myself included) started becoming optimistic that at SOME point, if Byrd couldn't get things going, sooner rather, later B-Jax would be moving up to the Majors. Dashing hopes, It was also "announced" that the earliest B-Jax would be promoted would be in June. By waiting until the June time-frame, Chicago would gain another year of control over Jackson. Surely everyone is in favor of retaining as many years of control as possible, especially since June isn't THAT far off. Makes plenty of sense.
Suddenly, at the end of last week and thru the early part of this past weekend, the trigger on the Byrd deal was pulled. Of course, knowing that June was the earliest to expect a Jackson call-up, my hopes were not awakened, though in my mind, a step towards Jackson was taken. The countdown until "June" and B-Jax had begun.
Now all call-up talk, especially the talk originating from the Cubs front office, is including "additional AAA experience needed." The "500 AAA at bats" phrase began circulating, in addition to the need to reducing strike-outs. Does all of this talk mean that we are probably not going to see B-Jax take the field in Chicago this year?
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:50 AM
"It's not the dress that makes you look fat, it's the fat that makes you look fat." - Al Bundy
"Ow" - Dylan Bundy
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:01 AM
But in reality, things may work out differently. Say Jackson keeps hitting, but can't cut down his strikeout numbers? Or what if the AAA pitchers start to make an adjustment, and his numbers fall off substantially? The front office knows their players, and they will promote them when they are ready, while taking into consideration things like contract arbitration and control years and whatnot. Jackson needs more time to be ready. How much more time will be determined by his performance.
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:03 AM
As for the 500 ABs thing, I'm not sure how much of that is speculation or off hand comments and how much is carved-in-stone plans by the front office. Certainly Jackson could use more time in Iowa, but I don't know that they'll leave him there for another 250ish AB. Really, the one guy who has the most to say about how long he stays in the minors is Brett Jackson.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).