Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Why Masahiro Tanaka Will Very Likely Be Posted Despite the Posting System Changes
Today, 03:29 PM
- Another Rumored Bullpen Target for the Cubs: Joba Chamberlain
Today, 01:24 PM
- Signing Day: McLouth, Feldman, Napoli, Johnson, and the Big Boys
Today, 10:31 AM
- Yankees Keep on Spending: Agree to Terms with Carlos Beltran
Today, 08:58 AM
- Tim McCarver to St. Louis? Yes, Please and Other Bullets
Today, 08:15 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Bring on the pitchforks
Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:52 AM
The Marshall deal might not look good at first look, but Marshall is actually pitching as bad as Marmol right now, his ERA is higher than Marmol's. If the Cubs had kept a struggling Marshall, we'd be looking at a team stuck with a struggling lefty that would have been an unrestricted free agent at the end of the year. Which means anything that Sappelt, Torreyes, or Wood contributes past this year is a positive gain for the Cubs while saving a few million dollars.
With Travis Wood in AAA and the bullpen a mess that Marshall deal isn't looking so great right now
This is way too early in the season to be judging a reliever's performance off their ERA. He had one bad outing against the Giants, but overall has converted 5-6 saves which is a hell lot more than what I can say for Marmol.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).