Recent Topics
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 19, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - Today, 08:00 AM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 18, 2013 (TV: CSN)Brett - Yesterday, 09:57 AM
-
Getting to stud pitchers earlycjdubbya - May 17 2013 12:49 PM
-
Avatar Contest for The Wifehansman1982 - May 17 2013 11:54 AM
-
Mets v. Cubs - May 17, 2013 (TV: WGN)Brett - May 17 2013 11:04 AM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Follow @BleacherNation
Bleacher Nation Posts
- This Week In The Minors: Still Checking Up
Today, 08:39 AM - One of the Best Rotations in Baseball? And Other Bullets
Today, 07:37 AM - Enhanced Box Score: Mets 2, Cubs 8 – May 18, 2013
Yesterday, 02:06 PM - Pre-Gamin’: Mets v. Cubs (12:05 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Yesterday, 10:28 AM - Sweet: Matt Garza is Coming Back Next Week
Yesterday, 09:54 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Today's birthdays
-
gratefulled (36)
Ideal trade partner for Garza
#17
Posted 28 May 2012 - 11:22 AM
No it's only two starts. He'll be fine. Plus he's a pitcher and pitchers always have more value.Anyone else worried that Garza is quickly losing any Blockbuster Trade Mojo (copyright pending) with these last two starts. We are asking (and should only accept) for a huge return, and although I'm sure other teams don't see two bad starts as greatly impacting their evaluation, it has to be leverage they can use when negotiating. At this point I'm not expecting a trade or an extension.
#18
Posted 29 May 2012 - 07:11 AM
Didn't Sveum say something about using his 4th best pitch too much and not his fastball? Could Hill be calling the game for the "old" Garza and not the new and improved Ace?Just sayin' but Koyie Hill caught his last two games.... HMMMMMMMMMM
#19
Posted 29 May 2012 - 07:22 AM
Didn't Sveum say something about using his 4th best pitch too much and not his fastball? Could Hill be calling the game for the "old" Garza and not the new and improved Ace?
Just sayin' but Koyie Hill caught his last two games.... HMMMMMMMMMM
Garza was shaking off Hill like crazy so I'm not sure I'm willing to put that on Hill just yet. Although, it could just be that Garza doesn't trust him. Not sure, it could go either way I guess.
#21
Posted 29 May 2012 - 08:07 PM
Yeah. CERA, but I believe most stat heads poop on it.I wouldn't trust him either... ha. Is there a stat that monitors the ERA of a catcher?
#23
Posted 29 May 2012 - 10:05 PM
No. Mlb Gm's allready who and what Garza is. Garza could poop his pants and I don't think it would matter unless it is injury related.Anyone else worried that Garza is quickly losing any Blockbuster Trade Mojo (copyright pending) with these last two starts. We are asking (and should only accept) for a huge return, and although I'm sure other teams don't see two bad starts as greatly impacting their evaluation, it has to be leverage they can use when negotiating. At this point I'm not expecting a trade or an extension.
#24
Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:54 AM
No. Mlb Gm's allready who and what Garza is. Garza could poop his pants and I don't think it would matter unless it is injury related.
Anyone else worried that Garza is quickly losing any Blockbuster Trade Mojo (copyright pending) with these last two starts. We are asking (and should only accept) for a huge return, and although I'm sure other teams don't see two bad starts as greatly impacting their evaluation, it has to be leverage they can use when negotiating. At this point I'm not expecting a trade or an extension.
An injury-related pooping of the pants?
#26
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
I think Garza for Turner and Castellanos would be a great deal, almost a steal for the Cubs.
#30
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:23 AM
Is this realistic?
Cubs: Garza and DeJesus(Maybe Filler)
for
Angels: Trout,Trumbo, and Wells
The only one on the list for the Angels that would get moved is Wells. Cubs would have to take on 90% of his salary as well. Trumbo and Trout, I would say, are untouchable.

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).










