A Possible "Reason" I Could Have Included In My Book
Oswego Chris - Yesterday, 03:46 PM
Bleacher Nation is on Facebook, and you should totally "Like" us:
Bleacher Nation is also on Twitter, and you should totally follow us:
Bleacher Nation Posts
- Pre-Gamin’: Cubs v. Pirates (11:35 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, etc.
Today, 09:57 AM
- Lukewarm Stove: International Prospect, Garza Value, Difficulty in Selling in May
Today, 09:01 AM
- Cubs Brass Visits Oklahoma Pitcher Jonathan Gray
Today, 07:50 AM
- The Reason the Cubs DFA’d Michael Bowden and Other Bullets
Today, 06:50 AM
- Cubs Minor League Daily: About Round Two
Today, 05:42 AM
Upcoming Calendar Events
Who would you rather in LF? (Boston edition)
Posted 27 September 2011 - 02:58 AM
Compare, if you will, these two left-fielders:
2011 Carl Crawford
128 G, .255/.290/.402 in 530 PA (0.4 oWAR*)
64 R, 45 XBH (11 HR), 56 RBI, 23 BB, 103 SO
$14 million salary
2011 Alfonso Soriano
137 G, .242/.286/.462 in 504 PA (0.4 oWAR*)
49 R, 53 XBH (25 HR), 85 RBI, 26 BB, 112 SO
$18 million salary
(* WAR from Baseball-Reference)
So. . . is it actually feasible that this year's edition of Soriano could have been more valuable to the Boston Red Sox if he had started in 2011 Crawford's place?
Crawford played on the best offense in MLB.
Faced the highest percentage of pitching from the American League East.
Despite a career low 18 SB, still a threat to run.
Decent defense, although he had one of his worst years with numerous gaffes in the field
Soriano played on a middle-of-the-pack offense in the NL.
Faced the highest percentage of pitching from the National League Central.
Career numbers of .287/.310/.491 in 175 PA at Fenway Park. (Hasn't played there regularly since 2005)
Not a threat to run at all.
His defense. . . Well. . . you know the story.
I know Boston would have loved to have Soriano's ten April homers, since they were in the midst of a 2-10 start and a losing April.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 07:26 AM
For 2012, I'd rather have Crawford on my team than Soriano, but the overall contract situation... man, that's a Hobson's Choice.
It's crazy to think that the Red Sox might have been better off in 2011 with Alfonso Soriano than with Carl Crawford.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 01:34 PM
As crazy as it sounds, If I was forced to choose one of these guys, I'd probably take Soriano, who is awful, but will be gone soon. Crawford will certainly rebound, but it is likely we've seen the start of a tremendous decline of his health/speed, and we'd be stuck with him for a while. And while Soriano without speed still has some worth via power, Crawford without speed is about as useless as they come
Posted 27 September 2011 - 02:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Bleacher Nation is not affiliated in any way with Major League Baseball or the Chicago National League Ballclub (that's the Cubs).