Loopholing an Explanation for the Cubs’ International Spending Approach

wallet cashFor the past couple of days, nerdy folks like me have been taking to our calculators to obsess over the Chicago Cubs’ reported 2013-14 international free agent signings.

It’s been a while since I’ve been in a math class, but I know how to use the plus button, and I couldn’t quite square what the Cubs were doing. With a number of top tier talents reportedly signed by – or “agreed to terms with” – the Cubs this week, the organization was set to blow far past its allotted international signing pool.

As I wrote last night:

After signing Torres, Moreno, and Mejia for $3.35 million, and after netting $963,000 extra to their $4,557,200 bonus pool yesterday via trades, the Cubs had about $2,446,210 left to spend, after considering the 5% they can go over without incurring dramatic penalties. With Matos getting $270,000, the Cubs are down to approximately $2,176,210, give or take a few bucks.

Thus, ostensibly, the Jimenez signing would put the Cubs way over their limit. In fact, they’d be so over the limit (more than 15%, by my quick calculation) that they’d be exposed to the most severe penalty: a 100% tax on the overage and (worse) the inability to sign any prospects for more than $250,000 for the next signing period.

The logical conclusion, then, was that some of these players weren’t yet “signed,” and the Cubs would be sure to acquire more pool space before officially signing these guys so that they didn’t blow the budget and become subjected to such a severe spending restriction next year. After all, we know two things to be unequivocally true about this front office: (1) they aren’t stupid, and (2) they aren’t going to sit out an opportunity to accumulate young talent.

But then rumors started circulating this morning that the Cubs were planning to go after even more expensive international talent this year (those rumors came from Phil Rogers, who deserves credit for getting this line of thinking started). Indeed, that rumor had the Cubs going after so much more international talent that, even if they added the 50% extra pool space that is permitted under the rules, they would *still* blow well past their budget, and would be subject to a 100% tax on the overage and the restricted ability to sign any individual player for more than $250,000.

Why would the Cubs do that to themselves? They’re going to have a huge pool again next year thanks to the poor big league performance, and the best international players get bonuses in excess of $250,000. In effect, the Cubs will have to sit out on all of the big names next year if they blow their budget this year. There’s no way they’d willingly do that, right?

Actually, yeah. They might. And it’s potentially genius.

Let’s imagine that the Cubs really liked this year’s international crop. Given how quickly, aggressively, and expansively they’ve gone after players, I’d say that’s a safe bet. Imagine further that the Cubs aren’t quite as enamored by next year’s crop – that’s not a requirement for this theory, but it certainly helps.

Against that backdrop, the Cubs decide to go hog wild spending this year. Yes, it will mean a huge overage tax and the inability to buy the big boys next year, but the Cubs love this year’s group, so it’s worth it in their eyes. Essentially, then, there are no spending restrictions for the Cubs this year – even if every other team is feeling the pinch of those restrictions. That creates inefficiency. That creates opportunity.

Going nuts this year costs the Cubs only one thing. And it’s the one thing they have that the new guys haven’t yet been able to leverage: money.

Back in the pre-new-CBA days, Theo Epstein’s regime was notorious for spending heavily on the amateur side. But, by the time he came to the Cubs, the ability to do that in the Draft was swiftly foreclosed. In the international market, restrictions also went into place, but under the approach the Cubs may now taking, those restrictions could work to their advantage.

Well, what about the signing restrictions for next year, you ask. Now the Cubs can’t sign any big names, and they’ve got this huge pool of money that they can’t really use effectively (yeah, they can spread it around to a bunch of $250,000 guys, but there are only so many talents at that precise level, and the Cubs aren’t going to get them all – the punishment is supposed to be restrictive, and it is). What a waste, right?

Nope. Here’s the loophole I see (assuming I’m reading the CBA correctly, and I don’t see this as being prohibited): if the Cubs decide they can’t effectively use their entire bonus pool next year because of the $250,000 restriction, they can trade pool space for players or prospects.

Think about what has happened by the end of this approach. The Cubs got to sign anyone and everyone they wanted in the 2013-14 international class. No real restrictions. Then, in 2014-15, they can sign their normal fill of low bonus, diamond-in-the-rough types, and use their big pool money to, essentially, buy players or prospects. By signing enough big-timers this year, the Cubs can more than overcome whatever they might lose in prospects next year. And then they can further make up for that loss by trading pool space.

All they’ve lost in this process is the one thing they’re happy to throw around: extra money.

In this way, the Cubs are converting the cash they’d like to be able to spend on the amateur side – but can’t, because of various restrictions – into a huge number of international prospects this year, and then (hopefully) some players or prospects next year. The key is that, even if you get penalized this year, your bonus pool next year does not go away. The pool remains an asset that you can use in trades next year.

This approach is exquisite, and brilliant, and perfectly aligned with what this front office is about.

(If you want to get very detailed about all of this, you’ll note that, because of the no-international-draft-poison-pill the MLBPA and MLB planted earlier this year, if you were going to blow your budget, this was the year to do it. If you do it next year, the penalties become much more harsh. These guys are just so freaking smart.)

Ok. Now that you understand the loophole, you’re all wondering one thing: if the Cubs were planning to blow past the budget anyway, what’s up with the trades they’ve made?

I think I can explain them all.

The Ronald Torreyes for $800,000 of pool space: If the Cubs were going to blow the budget, why ship off a promising youngster for pool money the Cubs weren’t going to use anyway? Well, it’s probably pretty simple. If the Cubs blow past the budget, then every dollar of pool space they acquire is a dollar they don’t have to spend in tax. In that way, if the Cubs do use the approach I described above, they just sold Torreyes for $800,000 in actual cash. We can debate whether he was worth more, but he’s a small, flawed prospect at a position in the Cubs’ organization (second base) that’s likely to become very crowded. His future was, at best, unclear, and if the Cubs didn’t believe his extreme hit tool would overcome all of the other issues, they were probably happy to sell him for some cash. (The added pool space also provided them cover if they couldn’t get all of the international prospects they wanted to sign. In that event, they could stay under their cap, and not blow the budget for guys they didn’t really want in the first place.)

Acquiring pool space in the Scott Feldman/Steve Clevenger deal: Given my feelings on the value of pool space, the approximately $400,000 in pool space that the Cubs picked up from the Orioles in the Feldman/Clevenger trade never struck me as all that valuable. Folks on all corners of the ‘net tried to convince you that the $400K – not even a 10% bump in the Cubs’ pool – was the entire thrust of the deal. No way. The Cubs, I suspect, actually really liked Jake Arrieta and Pedro Strop, and were willing to take a shot on them rather than the maybe-far-less-than-we-all-expected prospect packages they were offered. So, what was the pool space about? Well, I mean, the Cubs wanted it. It’s not like it’s worthless. Given the Torreyes description there, it was probably worth about $400,000 in real money to the Cubs. That’s a lot of dough, when you think about it. But in a big baseball trade, it’s a throw-in. That’s probably all this was. (With the caveat, once again, that more pool space gives the Cubs some cover if their SIGN ALL THE PLAYERS plan didn’t work out when it was time to put pen to paper.)

Sending $210,000 in pool space to the Dodgers in the Carlos Marmol trade: This makes a whole lot more sense now, doesn’t it? The pool space was only worth $210,000 of real cash to the Cubs, since they were going to blow the budget anyway. And since the Cubs saved $500,000 in the deal, they netted $290,000 in actual savings (assuming Marmol isn’t ultimately dropped, and then signs with another team, in which case it has been reported that the Cubs owe the Dodgers some more cash). Pretty simply explanation, and pretty logical, too.

So, there you have it. We’ll see if the Cubs’ approach actually bears this all out, but I now wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them nabbing some bigger names. In fact, it’s what I really hope to see now. I’m not in the front office, and I don’t know everything they know, but on paper here, this strategy looks pretty damn good.

Here’s hoping it happens, and that it works.

written by

Brett Taylor is the Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and on LinkedIn here. Brett is also the founder of Bleacher Nation, which opened up shop in 2008 as an independent blog about the Chicago Cubs. Later growing to incorporate coverage of other Chicago sports, Bleacher Nation is now one of the largest regional sports blogs on the web.

more cubs news

Chicago Cubs Lineup: Swanson Moves Down

CUBS LINEUP — Is Freddy Peralta the best matchup for the Cubs lineup to finally wake up? Nope! But at a certain point, they'll have to hit some good pitching. Really any pitching would be nice. Here's how Craig Counsell...

It Is Not Possible to Have a Worse Game-Ending Call

We beef a lot about lousy calls, as in the nature of baseball fans. And when it's a game-ending lousy call, the hostility gets ratcheted up quite a bit. Usually, the call is at least close enough that, although you...

MLBits: Jose Abreu on Minor League Demotion, Angel is Out, Ohtani Shares TJ Recovery Update, More

MLB Notes — Jose Abreu talked on Friday about the tough decision to accept his minor league demotion from the Astros last month, which he called the best thing he's done in his career, before making his return to the...

How to Watch Cubs Games: Full 2024 Schedule, Live Stream and More

Hey Cubs fans, if you’re looking to watch their games, you can find most of them on Marquee Sports Network. But that isn’t the only avenue to catch the action of your Cubbies on TV. Sometimes, they’ll be on other...

Cubs Farm Report | May 28, 2024: Top 25 Prospect Stock Report

The Chicago Cubs minor league affiliates were off on Monday, so it's time to take stock of some recent hot (and not-so-hot) performers inside the Cubs Top 25 prospects down on the farm in today's Cubs Farm Report. Cubs Farm...

Pre-Gamin’: Braves at Cubs (6:40 CT) – Lineups, Broadcast Info, Game Thread

CUBS LINEUP — It's a rematch! The Cubs won only one game during their series in Atlanta last week, and it was started (on both ends) by the guys on the mound tonight: Javier Assad and Charlie Morton. Let's hope...

A Couple More Potential Cubs Trade Targets Emerge (You Know … If They Are Still Buyers)

I added the parenthetical in the headline to appease the non-believers, but in reality, I'm not so conflicted. If I had to put money on it, I would still bet the Cubs are buyers at the July 30, 2024 MLB...

Pete Crow-Armstrong is the International League Player of the Week, Also-By-the-Way-He-is-Eligible-to-Return-to-the-Big-Leagues-in-Two-Days-Just-Sayin’

The Chicago Cubs optioned Pete Crow-Armstrong to the minors on May 20, which means he can return to the big league roster as soon as May 30. That is two days from now. Just throwing that out there and cc'ing...

Brewers Fans Are Really Making a Meal of Craig Counsell’s Return to Milwaukee

I really wish Craig Counsell's first return to American Family Field was a little more painful for the Brewers faithful. As in, I wish his first game back after ditching Milwaukee for Chicago was with a dominant Cubs team that...

That Was Justin Steele’s Best Outing In a While

After his previous outing, for which the final numbers didn't look as good as the stuff, Justin Steele said he was actually starting to feel good about where he was, after missing the first chunk of the season with the...

Latest News

The RBC Canadian Open TV Schedule, How to Watch and Live Stream

Watch the 2024 RBC Canadian Open at Hamilton Golf & Country Club in Hamilton, ON from May 30 - June 2, with the course playing at 7,084 yards as a par-70 with $9,400,000.00 in prize money as the purse. The...

Reds vs. Cardinals: Start Time, Streaming Live, TV Channel, How to Watch

Frankie Montas will take the ball for the Cincinnati Reds (24-30) when they host starter Matthew Liberatore and the St. Louis Cardinals (25-27) on Wednesday, with first pitch at 1:10 PM ET.If you're planning on watching this game, keep reading...

Dodgers vs. Mets: Start Time, Streaming Live, TV Channel, How to Watch

On Wednesday, James Paxton will take the mound for the Los Angeles Dodgers (33-22) versus David Peterson and the New York Mets (22-30), with first pitch scheduled for 4:10 PM ET at Citi Field.Keep scrolling to find out all the...

No. 3 Overall Pick Drake Maye Signs Rookie Deal With New England Patriots

The first-round picks from the 2024 NFL Draft continue to sign. Next up, New England Patriots quarterback Drake Maye. ESPN's Adam Schefter has the news and the contractual details: https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1795549275151118618 And just like that, Drake Maye becomes the highest draft...

Denver Nuggets Mock Draft: Nuggets Land 2 Exciting CBB Stars from Marquette, Gonzaga

As the 2024 NBA Draft approaches, the Denver Nuggets find themselves in an intriguing position with two picks in hand. This Denver Nuggets mock draft focuses on adding the best player available. The Nuggets' front office, led by General Manager...

Phillies vs. Giants: Start Time, Streaming Live, TV Channel, How to Watch

Cristopher Sanchez will take the ball for the Philadelphia Phillies (38-17) when they visit starting pitcher Kyle Harrison and the San Francisco Giants (28-27) on Wednesday, with first pitch at 3:45 PM ET.Find out how to watch the Philadelphia-San Francisco...

Padres vs. Marlins: Free Live Stream, TV Channel, How to Watch

The San Diego Padres (29-28), who will give the start to Yu Darvish, host the Miami Marlins (19-36) with Braxton Garrett on the mound, Wednesday at 4:10 PM ET.Keep scrolling to find out all the details on how to watch...

Blackhawks Sign Zach Sanford To One-Year, Two-Way Contract

After announcing an entry-level deal with Martin Misiak on Tuesday, the Blackhawks signed another forward. The Blackhawks announced the team has signed forward Zach Sanford on a one-year, two-way contract that runs through the 2024-25 season. The deal has a $775,000 salary...

Mavs at T-Wolves Game 4: First Basket Props, Odds, and More for Tonight

The NBA Western Conference Finals are reaching a critical juncture as the Minnesota Timberwolves and the Dallas Mavericks prepare for Game 4. With the Mavericks leading the series 3-0, tonight's matchup is a must-win for the Timberwolves to keep their...

WATCH: Go Inside the Chicago Bears 2024 NFL Draft War Room

Before I left for a mini-vacation, I wrote this post sharing video from the Minnesota Vikings 2024 draft war room. Part of me thought it was worth sharing because I find it worthwhile to keep tabs on the Chicago Bears'...

more cubs news