The 2020 NFL Draft is NEXT WEEK.
Sorry, I needed to capitalize that to properly emphasize how close we are to a new wave of talent joining the Chicago Bears. Just the thought of infusing new blood into the talent pool is borderline intoxicating.
As we stride closer to the actual draft, we will see an increase of multi-round mocks predicting, projecting, and hypothesizing what teams will (could? should?) do over draft weekend. And because the Bears don’t have a first-round pick next week, I live for these seven-round behemoths that get mocked by football gurus.
Here’s the latest from Dane Brugler of The Athletic:
7-Round Mock Draft. All 255 picks. Team-by-team hauls at the bottom.
**Disclaimer: I obviously hate your team.https://t.co/sG9a5xeGXq
— Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) April 13, 2020
Seven rounds. Two hundred fifty-five picks. No quarterbacks going to the Bears.
Wait, what?
Before we dive into how and why it shakes out like this from Brugler’s perspective, let’s take a look at the players he sends Chicago’s way:
This draft does a lot to plug holes on the Bears’ roster. Every pick made for the Bears by Brugler is one that’s easy to understand. I would even go as far to suggest that each of these picks – in isolation – is easily defensible.
And yet, I come back to the Bears not drafting a quarterback and thinking to myself “huh?”
Four quarterbacks (Burrow, Tua, Herbert, Love) are off the board by the time the Bears go on the clock at No. 43. So let’s take a look at the guys the Bears could have taken at any point in the mock, but ultimately passed on.
Altogether, 11 quarterbacks were taken in this mock draft, which seems like a normal number. And if that’s how it goes down, it will mark the fifth time in six drafts in which GM Ryan Pace didn’t draft a quarterback.
So … what gives?
Formulating an answer as to why Chicago wouldn’t draft a quarterback is as easy to explain as pointing out the team has more glaring needs at other spots on the depth chart to draft a third/developmental quarterback. Running that down is pretty easy.
As for passing on one of the Eason, Hurts, Fromm group … I get it. I might not necessarily like it, but I can understand why it could happen.
For starters, the Bears don’t have a third-round pick. Therefore, reaching for one of these three prospects with a top-50 pick might not be in the team’s best short-term interests. Even still … at what point do the Bears consider the big picture when it comes to quarterback evaluation?
Mitch Trubisky’s rookie deal is slated to expire at the end of the 2020 season. Nick Foles could opt out of his contract at any point in the next two offseason. Which means that the Bears could be left in a situation where they don’t have any quarterbacks on the roster. To be fair, that scenario playing out is a long-shot, but we have seen crazier things happen.
For what it’s worth, not drafting a QB doesn’t mean the Bears won’t add another one to the room. Nate Stanley (ESPN’s QB10), Josh Love (PFF’s QB10), and Brian Lewerke (CBS Sports’ QB10) would be part of the undrafted free agent frenzy. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if the Bears traveled that route in search of a developmental signal caller. From there, it won’t be until 2021 until Chicago can draft another quarterback. And depending on how the 2020 campaign goes, who will be making the call on the pick might not be whomever is in charge right now.