Various Thoughts on the Rooftops’ Lawsuit Against the Chicago Cubs

judge gavel courtThis week, two rooftops finally threw down and sued the Chicago Cubs (and owner Tom Ricketts, individually) over the renovations at Wrigley Field, and, more specifically, over the signage in the outfield that may impact their views. While the suit does contemplate a breach of contract claim, it is largely focused on an argument that the Cubs sought to bully the rooftops to sell and to fix prices, all in violation of federal antitrust laws.

You can read the full lawsuit here.

I’m going to offer some stray thoughts on the suit, but, before I do, massive caveating:

  1. I am no longer a practicing attorney, and I haven’t been one for almost four years now (whoa). None of this is legal advice or legal opinion. Even if I were still a practicing attorney, all I could offer you today is a very general, legal perspective on the specific language of this complaint, and on the legal principles that govern the claims. Don’t take my thoughts for any more than they are: the musings of a dude who knows a little bit about corporate lawsuits, and who is looking at what is in this particular suit.
  2. Any lawyer worth his salt – or former lawyer worth his salt – will tell you that, even with the complaint (and related contract) available for viewing, you can’t analyze the entirety of the legal situation without the broader context. That means supporting documents, correspondence between the parties, other agreements that might be in place, statutory and administrative law in the relevant jurisdiction, and the positions/pressure points/etc. of the parties. That last one can be a biggy, because frequently, business decisions supersede legal positions.
  3. I know a little bit about antitrust law, but it was not my practice area. I did focus on these kinds of corporate lawsuits, so you run across it organically from time to time. But I am no antitrust expert. At all.
  4. This is a really bare-bones analysis, written for BN readers. In other words, I’m not drafting a memo for a partner here or a brief for a court. I’m trying to balance meaningful analysis with a writing style that is actually enjoyable/easy to read. You lawyers out there: don’t rip me.

So, then, some thoughts on the suit …

  • A general reminder to those who sit down and read the suit: all complaints since the history of ever are written in the strongest possible tone, and will always make the other side look very bad. Two sides could draft a complaint about the exact same event, and, if you read only one of them, you’d be convinced the other side was a dirtbag … until you read the other side. This is simply the way these things work. Indeed, seeing this day in and day out during my years of practice is the primary reason many of you perceive my writing here to be wishy-washy and constantly apologizing for “the other side.” It’s because there’s always another side to the story. Always, always, always. And it’s usually not the case that one side is 100% wrong, and the other 100% right.
  • “Price-fixing scheme” makes for good headlines, but is there any merit to the antitrust claim? I think the complaint is written in a way to make something that, at first, would have seemed like an insane claim (the Cubs tried to fix prices on their own tickets … well, duh) actually read like something that makes a little sense (there was a broader market for Cubs tickets, and the Cubs tried to inhibit competition by forcing price baselines). I get the argument. But after letting it roll around in my head a little longer, it seems like a clever, but ultimately difficult, argument.
  • The rooftops complain that Cubs have a 93% share of the market for live Cubs tickets (which amounts to an unlawful monopoly), and effectively suggest that the Cubs created that market by contracting with the rooftops to also sell live Cubs tickets. If I understand that argument correctly, and turn it on its head: the Cubs did not have an illegal monopoly when they controlled 100% of the live Cubs tickets (like most sports teams), but the moment they allowed even 1% of that market to be sold by another entity, they have created a monopoly? By selling a smaller share of live Cubs tickets, the Cubs went from no monopoly to monopoly?
  • The actual argument is a little more nuanced than that, but you can see how difficult it becomes when you restate it in slightly different terms. And we didn’t even get into the idea that live Cubs tickets compete in the entertainment market (that’s ultimately what governs pricing), the idea that the rooftop experience isn’t solely about watching live Cubs games (there’s also food and drink)*, and the idea that the Cubs and rooftops might not actually be competitors for live Cubs games at all (since they are also partners). The antitrust argument becomes complicated very quickly, and, while I won’t pretend to give you the “answer” on how this shakes out, I do know enough to tell you that the Cubs are going to have some very strong arguments to get the claim dismissed. The rooftops will have responses to those arguments, however, which means we’re likely going to see a lot of briefing early on this case (several months) before things get to a potential settlement stage.
  • *(The rooftops actually use this fact to plead an alternative antitrust claim, i.e., that if the rooftop tickets are a different market from Cubs tickets, then the Cubs are engaging in anticompetitive behavior by trying to intrude on the rooftop market and gobble up a monopoly there, too. Again, it’s clever, but it’s difficult.)
  • You’re going to ask me whether baseball’s antitrust exemption plays into this anywhere, and my rough answer is … I don’t think so. That exemption, historically, has been fairly limited (mostly to labor), and it wouldn’t apply if, for example, the Cubs started selling tacos and sought to illegally monopolize the taco market in Chicago (“Tacos: $85. You can’t get them anywhere else in Chicago, so get ’em at Wrigley Field! They’re stamped with a C!” (Yes, yes, I know tacos are part of the broader food market – I’m just trying to keep things light.). The antitrust exemption is not carte blanche to engage in anticompetitive behavior.
  • By making the thrust of the complaint about antitrust, it seems like the rooftops are trying to avoid the real heart of the case: do the rooftops have a contractually enforceable right not to be blocked by the signage in the renovation plan? Everything actually flows from that question, because if the answer is no, then the Cubs can threaten to block the rooftops all they want in order to get a better sale price on the rooftops. Further, the Cubs can complain to the rooftops about their ticket pricing with signage as leverage because, again, the rooftops wouldn’t have a right not to be blocked in the first place. We discussed the rooftops’ contractual right not to be blocked before, and, my take on the contract is that the Wrigley renovation sure looks and smells like an “expansion,” of which the signage is an integral part, and the rooftops’ views can be blocked as part of an expansion approved by governmental authorities (as this was). It looks like an uphill climb for the rooftops.
  • I can’t help but wonder whether the rooftops wouldn’t be jumping through these antitrust hoops if they felt more strongly about their contract claim. Sure, the breach of contract claim is in the complaint, too, but it’s very clearly not the focus. The problem for the rooftops, though, is that it appears everything is going to turn on the contract, anyway, no matter how clever the antitrust argument is.
  • There are a number of allegations that Cubs personnel and the Ricketts made aggressive or intimidating comments about signage in order to pressure the rooftop owners to sell. I’m not sure what I think about these allegations. For one thing, I’m not entirely sure they actually support the legal claims made in the lawsuit. In other words, even if they’re true, I’m not sure they really make a difference in the lawsuit. For another, I’m not really sure they’re unfair or inappropriate things to say within the business context that was at play. Isn’t applying pressure on another party in business negotiations by using whatever leverage you have just, like, part of the game? The way the allegations are stated certainly make the Cubs personnel look like jerks, but, again, I’m not sure whether the point of those allegations was to try and win a lawsuit, or to try and make the Cubs look bad. Those allegations sure are getting a lot of attention in the media.
  • One other thing: there is a whole lot of argument in this complaint. Usually, you don’t see quite so much actual argumentation of the legal claims in a complaint. Sometimes, that’s a sign of a lack of confidence in the claims, because, typically, a complaint can stand on its own factual allegations, and you deal with the legal wrangling down the road. None of this necessarily means anything, but, if you’re asking me to draw upon my past experience, that’s something that would have stood out to me.
  • As for all of the other causes of action in the suit, I can understand why they were included … and I can also understand why they weren’t the primary focus. Many of them are simply the kinds of causes of action you include in cases like this, because you never know what angle you might need to take once you get into briefing, and because you maybe-kinda-sorta might have an argument.
  • All in all, I wouldn’t call the lawsuit frivolous, but I also wouldn’t say I was immediately concerned that the renovation was in peril or that the Cubs were going to take a massive budget hit. I suspect this will proceed quietly over the next several months (in fact, dollars to donuts says that the next update comes quite a while from now, and most of you go, “Oh, yeah, I forgot about that lawsuit!”), and the court will be aggressive in trying to spur a settlement, assuming this gets past the motion to dismiss stage.
  • It’s interesting that just two rooftops – that may be related – are participating in this suit against the Cubs, whereas several more are participating in the suit against the City. (These two are also involved in the City suit.) There’s some kind of strategic decision involved, and I won’t speculate on the rationale. I just thought it was interesting.
  • written by

    Brett Taylor is the Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and on LinkedIn here. Brett is also the founder of Bleacher Nation, which opened up shop in 2008 as an independent blog about the Chicago Cubs. Later growing to incorporate coverage of other Chicago sports, Bleacher Nation is now one of the largest regional sports blogs on the web.

    more cubs news

    The First Chicago Cubs Lineup of the Year is Here!

    *SHORT COURTS: It's Time To Bring The Home Court, Home! Looking for a unique way to celebrate your athlete or team before you peruse the FIRST CHICAGO CUBS LINEUP of the Year? Don't miss out! For just one more week...

    The Cubs Are Among the Most Returning-y Teams

    I am still mostly incapacitated at the moment, so apologies for the short shrift on such an otherwise blessed day. In between pokes and prods, I wanted to share a chart I saw that was pretty interesting, even if unsurprising:...

    Maybe the Cubs Are the Favorites in the NL Central, After All?

    ESPN was the first to throw some love the Cubs way this week, with an overwhelming majority of their writers, analysts, and editors picking the Chicago Cubs to win the NL Central in 2024. But the love doesn't end there....

    The Season Begins, Love for Morel, Counsell’s Value, and Other Cubs Bullets

    You know where you want to spend your Opening Day morning? The hospital! Suffice to say, this is not how I imagined getting HYPED for the Cubs' opener. I guess I'll just have to think about all the possible lineup...

    Cubs vs Rangers: The First Series of the Year!

    Cubs vs Rangers — THE REGULAR SEASON IS HERE! Wake up and rejoice. Later tonight, the Cubs will begin their march toward October Baseball against the (reigning World Series champion) Texas Rangers in Arlington. Justin Steele is getting the nod...

    The 2024 Chicago Cubs for Dummies

    Boom. We made it. The offseason is over, and the Cubs regular season - and those elevated expectations - begins tomorrow. But in case you slept through the winter, I'm here to catch you up on everything you need to...

    I’m Expecting More This Year, Cubs — It’s Time to Start Winning

    There's no way around it: The Chicago Cubs did *not* have the offseason we hoped they might after making Craig Counsell the highest paid manager in MLB history. Not that they did poorly, mind you. Cody Bellinger, Shota Imanaga, and...

    I Dug Deep on the Cubs 2024 Schedule (And I Like What I See)

    Finally, with Cody Bellinger in the fold, we can start focusing more seriously on the season ahead. So today, I thought we'd take a look at the Cubs 2024 schedule. You can flip through the Cubs 2024 schedule right here...

    Here’s What I’m Betting on the Cubs for Opening Day

    I get it. Sports betting isn't for everyone — like, say, the interpreter for an international baseball superstar — but some of us quite enjoy it! If you are one of those people, this article is for you. Below, I'm...

    WAKE UP, BASEBALL IS BACK

    The day has arrived. Opening Day. The most glorious day on the baseball calendar, save for the day of each Chicago Cubs World Series win, of course. See, I get to say things like that on Opening Day. Maybe the...

    Latest News

    Matt Eberflus Opens a Window to the Chicago Bears Draft Plans

    NFL coaches are notoriously tight-lipped. And in his first two seasons as Bears head coach, Matt Eberflus has been no different. But every once in a while you'll catch Eberflus peel back the curtain and provide some insight regarding the...

    Braves vs. Phillies: Free Live Stream, TV Channel, How to Watch

    Ronald Acuna Jr. and the Atlanta Braves take on Kyle Schwarber and the Philadelphia Phillies in their season opener on Friday, with first pitch at 3:05 PM ET.See how to watch the Atlanta-Philadelphia matchup below.When is Braves vs. Phillies and...

    Jonas Valančiūnas Player Props: Three-Pointer Props and Odds vs. the Bucks – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The New Orleans Pelicans face the Milwaukee Bucks at 8:00 PM ET on Thursday, and one of the 3-pointer props available for this matchup requires only one trifecta from Jonas Valančiūnas.Jonas Valančiūnas' Three-Pointer Prop Odds vs. the BucksJonas Valanciunas' over/under...

    Top 25 College Basketball Picks and Best Bets: March 28

    The Illinois Fighting Illini and the Iowa State Cyclones hit the court in one of four games on the college basketball slate on Thursday that include a ranked team.How to Bet on Top 25 Games[lasso rel="draftkings-promo-1" id="299003"]Top 25 Games for...

    What Does a Chicago Bears NFL Draft Trade Down Look Like?

    You'd think we'd be well-versed in trade-back options after months of wondering what kind of haul it would take for the Bears to move off taking quarterback Caleb Williams with the first pick of the 2024 NFL Draft. But trading...

    Diamondbacks vs. Rockies Prediction: Expert Picks, Odds, Stats & Best Bets – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The Arizona Diamondbacks start their season as home favorites (-230) in a matchup with the Colorado Rockies on Thursday at 10:10 PM ET, live on ARID from Chase Field.Zac Gallen will get the ball for Arizona while Colorado will counter...

    Mariners vs. Red Sox Prediction: Expert Picks, Odds, Stats & Best Bets – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The Seattle Mariners are moneyline favorites (-154) to begin their season with a home win over the Boston Red Sox on Thursday at 10:10 PM ET, live on NESN.Seattle's Luis Castillo gets the start, and he'll go against Boston's Brayan...

    Guardians vs. Athletics Prediction: Expert Picks, Odds, Stats & Best Bets – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The Cleveland Guardians start their season as road favorites (-156) in a matchup with the Oakland Athletics on Thursday at 10:07 PM ET, live on NBCS-CA from Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum.Cleveland's Shane Bieber and Oakland's Alex Wood have been named the...

    Damian Lillard Player Props: Three-Pointer Props and Odds vs. the Pelicans – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The Milwaukee Bucks face the New Orleans Pelicans on Thursday at 8:00 PM ET, and if the Bucks' Damian Lillard drains four 3-pointers, he'll beat his over/under.Damian Lillard's Three-Pointer Prop Odds vs. the PelicansDamian Lillard's over/under for three-pointers in this...

    Brook Lopez Player Props: Three-Pointer Props and Odds vs. the Pelicans – Thursday, March 28, 2024

    The Milwaukee Bucks face the New Orleans Pelicans at 8:00 PM ET on Thursday, and one of the 3-pointer over/unders available for this matchup requires two trifectas from Brook Lopez.Brook Lopez's Three-Pointer Prop Odds vs. the PelicansBrook Lopez's over/under for...

    more cubs news