I Keep Seeing Pushback About Kris Bryant’s Trade Value – “Concerns” From Interested Teams – And I’m Not Convinced

Whether you want to see Kris Bryant retained by the Cubs no matter what – regardless of trade value or whether an extension is realistic – it is still very important to understand how the market is perceiving Bryant and the Cubs. I am fairly well convinced at this point that the Cubs are seriously considering moving Bryant after his service time grievance is resolved, but *only* if the return is sufficiently overwhelming.

There are versions of a return that I would find, personally, to make for an understandable trade when you consider the Cubs’ apparently inability to push in (financially) for 2020 and 2021, and the Cubs’ need (legitimate, in my view) to add quite a bit of young talent if they want to avoid falling off a competitive cliff post-2021. I wouldn’t go so far as to say I’m someone who wants to see the Cubs trade Kris Bryant. Instead, I’m someone who does want to see the Cubs smooth that future transition, and ideally do so in a way that doesn’t completely take competing in 2020 (much less 2021) off the table. So I’m open to a Bryant trade, but if the Cubs are going to do it right now at this particular moment, then the return better be a doozy.

To that end, and you’ve probably noticed over the past week, I’ve become particularly intrigued by the relative barrage of reports out there from anonymous non-Cubs execs/scouts/pundits/etc. tossing out a range of concerns about Bryant going forward, and appearing to throw considerable cold water on any expected return in a Bryant trade. It all very much has the feel of bogus efforts by interested teams to hold down the price, and I’m suspicious of the intentions.

The latest comes from a Buster Olney write-up at ESPN, which is worth a look for the context:

“Rival evaluators have their concerns, however, starting with his salary. Bryant, who turns 28 next month, is projected to make about $18.5 million through arbitration, according to the website MLBTradeRumors.com, and that will set him up for an award in the range of $25 million to $30 million in 2021. He is represented by Boras, who almost always takes his clients into free agency, so any team that acquires Bryant would view him as an expensive, short-time employee.

And some team analysts who have dug deep into the numbers see some regression in his performance — in his defense at third base, for starters, and in the impact of his baserunning. Among 135 hitters who qualified for the batting title, Bryant ranked 110th in the rate of hard-hit balls.”

Rather than dismiss it all out of hand, this time I figured I’ll take some time to actually address the underlying “concerns” about Bryant as a trade target.

I want to give it a fair look, because it’s not as though there aren’t *some* issues to explore. Maybe we’re all underselling those issues because of an overall sense of affection for a guy who came up with the Cubs and has been so instrumental in the success since 2015. Or maybe it’s all still kinda bogus.

… or, as is usually the case – in life! – the reality is somewhere in the middle.

Overall Offensive Performance

I think if you were going to make some hay here, you’d point to Bryant’s overall performance in 2018-19, versus his performance in the first three years of his career, which included a Rookie of the Year award and an MVP.

From 2015-17, Bryant was an offensive powerhouse:

(via FanGraphs)

In each of those seasons Bryant’s wRC+ ranked 8th in the NL, 4th in the NL, and 6th in the NL.

In the last two years, Bryant has still been very good – with a nice bounceback in 2019 – but the overall results haven’t been on par with 2015-17. Here’s 2018-19:

(via FanGraphs)

A legit downswing? Some injury-related flukiness? Bad luck?

I think there’s probably a lot of noise and signal going on, but I think it’s worth pointing out that Bryant’s 2019 season (.282/.382/.521, 135 wRC+) was a good bit better than 2018, which is dragging down the numbers a bit (and featured far too much time played with a shoulder injury that was sapping his power).

Bryant’s 135 wRC+ in 2019 was 10th in the NL. In 2018, it was 20th.

Of all the ways to push back against a huge price tag on Bryant, the concerns that he’s trending downward already on the offensive side would probably be the most credible push. Then again, you’re still talking about one of the best bats in the NL, and, heading into his age 28 season, you wouldn’t necessarily bet against him continuing to be a top 10 guy or maybe even popping up a little better.

Contact Data

I mention this one because of the Olney paragraph, but I really don’t see it. Bryant has never been a “hard contact” guy, but that’s because his swing is engineered to produce deep line drives and fly balls – and thanks to his size, strength, and levers, that generally leads not only to huge power, but also a huge BABIP. The dude routinely has a groundball rate some 10 percentage points lower than league average – and only 20 batters had a lower mark than his 35.9% in 2019.

Heck, in Bryant’s 2017 season – arguably better offensively than his 2016 MVP campaign – his 32.8% hard contact rate was not only below his career average, it was only a single percent above league average. Bryant’s success is not predicated on that particular metric. He’s a lot like his teammate, Anthony Rizzo, in that regard. Rizzo has always sported extremely meh hard contact rates, but has always produced exceptional offense. Squaring the ball up with just the right amount of loft is always going to produce better offensive overall than a guy who can eye-pop with exit velocity but isn’t as frequently squaring it up or keeping it in the ideal launch zone.

On the whole, the contact data ain’t gonna be a great angle if you’re looking to poo-poo Bryant’s performance or projections. This is the style of hitter he has always been, and it works quite well.

Defense

This one should catch some traction, because Bryant’s advanced metrics have absolutely taken a hit at third base the last few years, going from decently above-average in his first two seasons, and sliding down to solidly-below-average the last two years. Given Bryant’s size and the questions about his long-term prospects at third base from when he was a prospect, it’s not surprising – or unreasonable – that a statistical drop right now would cause teams pause.

The flip side of that, though, is that Bryant is able to play the corner outfield spots acceptably – which is a value add on the defensive side – and has the potential to be a very solid corner outfield defender if he were moved there. At third base, while he rated very poorly in 2018, his UZR/150 bounced back in a pretty significant way in 2019.

(Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Also, I think you have to keep things in perspective a bit: despite the “down” numbers on defense, Bryant still posted a 4.8 WAR, making him the 11th most valuable player in the NL in 2019, tied with huge bats like Juan Soto and Pete Alonso. The ability to play decent, even if not great, defense at third base makes you a whole lot more valuable than if you’re just a bat.

Is defense a big selling point, in a Bryant trade? No. Is it a huge ding to his trade value, however? Eh. I don’t see it.

Baserunning

There was a time in his early days that Kris Bryant was (rightly) regarded as one of the best non-base-stealing baserunners in the game. Just watch him score from first base on Anthony Rizzo’s hit in Game 7 of the World Series if you forget what a freaking gazelle he was out there. He was the embodiment of the idea that a guy could be an extremely valuable baserunner without stealing a lot of bases.

Anecdotally, it feels like maybe that baserunning ability has faded. Your brain says you see Bryant getting thrown out on balls to the left side that maybe he didn’t used to, and there have been double play grounders that he used to beat out every single time – he grounded in a career-high 10 double plays in 2019.

But then again, while Bryant might not be an elite baserunner anymore, his 3.8 BsR on FanGraphs was still 22nd best in all of baseball last year, ahead of guys like Adam Eaton, Starling Marte, and Jason Heyward. He was way down in his injury-abbreviated 2018 season, but I’m not sure there’s actual signal there, especially given that he was right back up there in 2019. Instead, there’s reason to believe Bryant will continue to be a baserunner in the range he’s been for most of his career: very, very good.

Moreover, when you look at the leaderboard, sure, you see the obvious “speed” guys up there, but, in the top 50, you also see a ton of established veterans who are simply good at baserunning with only a modicum of speed. It’s a skill that can age well, even as speed fades.

… and since we’re talking about Bryant’s age 28 and 29 seasons under team control here, I’m really not sure this is a great ding to Bryant’s value either.

Injuries

Strangely, this is almost never discussed as an issue, so I added it myself. I guess it doesn’t come up because Bryant didn’t miss much time in 2019, hasn’t needed surgery, and injuries are a part of the game. But if I’m a trade partner wanting some leverage, I’m pointing to back-to-back seasons of injury issues (shoulder, then knee) that linger long enough and were pronounced enough to become cited as “reasons” for down performance.

Neither issue is expected to have an impact on Bryant in 2020 and beyond in any kind of specific way, but it’s just kinda odd that it doesn’t even really come up in these conversations. Speaking as a Cubs fan, I do worry at least a little bit about how those injuries impacted Bryant’s performance and limited his upside in 2018 and 2019. Hard to see how trade partners wouldn’t feel the same.

(Photo by David Banks/Getty Images)

Contract Considerations

I saved this one for last, because it is, to me, the most bogus concern out there. I’m not talking about the service time grievance, mind you – that’ll be resolved one way or another before any trade would proceed, so it is kind of a whole separate consideration. Plus, virtually everyone, including the Cubs, is proceeding on the assumption that Bryant will ultimately lose, and still be subject to two more years of arbitration before free agency.

Thus, instead, I’m talking about the finger-wagging you see about “oh, but he’s still pretty pricey!”

Bryant’s $18+ million projection in arbitration in 2019 is a lot of money compared to other arb-year players, sure. But it’s also barely half what a guy like Anthony Rendon is getting in free agency, and his deal came with seven guaranteed years. I mean, *Mike Moustakas* just got four guaranteed years at $16 million. Josh Donaldson might require $25 million annually for three or four years. Do not start talking to me about how $18 million in 2019 is some outrageous or damaging sum for Bryant. Absurd.

Moreover, the fact that Bryant is in arbitration is a big factor here. The ability to acquire a top-tier impact player for two arbitration years, with a required outlay under $20 million, is a huge plus, not a minus. Oh no, he might make $25 million in 2021! Seriously? That’s a one-year bargain-rate contract! And you aren’t even committing to it today! It’s an *option* thanks to the arbitration system. If, God forbid, Bryant suffered a catastrophic injury in 2020, the team with his rights doesn’t have to pay him anything in 2021. Free agents signed to monster contracts don’t come with the luxury of being able to non-tender them.

You don’t acquire a guy like Bryant for a big price tag ever thinking about non-tendering him after one season, but the flexibility preserved to be able to do so? That has actual value. Why do you think teams want as short of deals as possible for free agents? Why do you think teams want extensions for pre-arb and arb players to always end in team option years?

In sum, the contract considerations here – if they’re being offered up as a reason Bryant’s price tag should come way down – are completely bogus and should be dismissed completely as pure negotiations in the media.

Whether Bryant’s offense might be trending down a bit, whether there are nagging injury considerations, and whether his defense hurts his value a little bit? Yeah, I think those are fair discussion points, even if all have pretty easy counters from the Cubs.

On the whole, through this exercise, I’m not seeing a lot that should push the Cubs to move off of their “absurd” asking price for Bryant if they’re going to move him right now. Whatever team Bryant is on in 2020 – including the Cubs – will be improved tremendously by his presence, and, at age 28, there’s no reason not to keep “upside” on the table of considerations, too.

(Photo by David Banks/Getty Images)

written by

Brett Taylor is the Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and on LinkedIn here. Brett is also the founder of Bleacher Nation, which opened up shop in 2008 as an independent blog about the Chicago Cubs. Later growing to incorporate coverage of other Chicago sports, Bleacher Nation is now one of the largest regional sports blogs on the web.

more cubs news

NC State vs Marquette Predictions and Odds: March Madness Best Bets

March Madness matchups bring us a great battle tonight as 11-seed NC State battles 2-seed Marquette. Check out the odds, stats, and more for NC State vs Marquette which tips off at 7:09 pm ET tonight. NC State vs Marquette...

Justin Steele Injury Update: New Classification, MRI Tomorrow, IL Stint Coming? Steele and Counsell Speak

A significant update on Justin Steele came from Craig Counsell tonight after the Cubs extra innings loss in Texas. In short: Yes, a stint on the Injured List is likely for Justin Steele. But we still don't know how severe...

Enhanced Box Score: Rangers 4, Cubs 3 – March 28, 2024

It took exactly one day for the Cubs' ace to sustain what may be a significant injury, for their closer to blow a save, for the umpires to significantly impact the outcome of a critical play (this time in the...

OMG: Michael Busch Scored the 9th Inning, GO-AHEAD Run, Because He Just Never Stopped Running

That was absolutely incredible. To all the little kids out there, when your coach tells you to never stop running, this is why. Rookie Cubs 1B Michael Busch (the guy the Cubs got from the Dodgers this offseason to be...

Pre-Gamin’: Cubs at Rangers – Lineups, Pitching Matchup, Broadcast Info, Game Thread

*SHORT COURTS: It's Time To Bring The Home Court, Home! Looking for a unique way to celebrate your athlete or team before you peruse the FIRST CHICAGO CUBS LINEUP of the Year? Don't miss out! For just one more week...

The Cubs Are Among the Most Returning-y Teams

I am still mostly incapacitated at the moment, so apologies for the short shrift on such an otherwise blessed day. In between pokes and prods, I wanted to share a chart I saw that was pretty interesting, even if unsurprising:...

Maybe the Cubs Are the Favorites in the NL Central, After All?

ESPN was the first to throw some love the Cubs way this week, with an overwhelming majority of their writers, analysts, and editors picking the Chicago Cubs to win the NL Central in 2024. But the love doesn't end there....

The Season Begins, Love for Morel, Counsell’s Value, and Other Cubs Bullets

You know where you want to spend your Opening Day morning? The hospital! Suffice to say, this is not how I imagined getting HYPED for the Cubs' opener. I guess I'll just have to think about all the possible lineup...

Cubs vs Rangers: The First Series of the Year!

Cubs vs Rangers — THE REGULAR SEASON IS HERE! Wake up and rejoice. Later tonight, the Cubs will begin their march toward October Baseball against the (reigning World Series champion) Texas Rangers in Arlington. Justin Steele is getting the nod...

The 2024 Chicago Cubs for Dummies

Boom. We made it. The offseason is over, and the Cubs regular season - and those elevated expectations - begins tomorrow. But in case you slept through the winter, I'm here to catch you up on everything you need to...

Latest News

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Preview: 2024 Free Agents and Team Needs

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers enjoyed a successful 2023 season, capturing their third straight NFC South title and pushing the Detroit Lions in a thrilling Divisional Round matchup. This strong showing translates to a relatively stable roster with few glaring weaknesses...

NC State vs Marquette Predictions and Odds: March Madness Best Bets

March Madness matchups bring us a great battle tonight as 11-seed NC State battles 2-seed Marquette. Check out the odds, stats, and more for NC State vs Marquette which tips off at 7:09 pm ET tonight. NC State vs Marquette...

Best NBA Prop Bets Today – Friday, March 29, 2024

Today's NBA schedule has 12 quality competitions in store. Among those games is the Minnesota Timberwolves playing the Denver Nuggets.NBA prop bets for today's games are available, so if you're interested in placing a bet or building a parlay, you'll...

Updated Elite 8 Odds: UConn Betting Favorite To Win March Madness

There were some great performances last night including a 30-point win by the UConn Huskies sending them to the Elite Eight. Are they the betting favorite to win March Madness? What team is sitting on top of the odds to...

UConn vs. Illinois Prediction: Expert Picks, Odds, Stats and Best Bets – NCAA Tournament Round Elite Eight

The No. 1 seed UConn Huskies (34-3) are 8.5-point favorites to advance to the Final Four when they play the No. 3 seed Illinois Fighting Illini (29-8) in the NCAA Tournament Elite Eight on Saturday at TD Garden, airing on...

Alabama vs. Clemson Prediction: Expert Picks, Odds, Stats and Best Bets – NCAA Tournament Round Elite Eight

The No. 4 seed Alabama Crimson Tide (24-11) and No. 6 seed Clemson Tigers (24-11) will both be vying for a spot in the NCAA Tournament Final Four when they meet on Saturday at Crypto.com Arena, tipping off at 8:49...

How to Watch UConn Huskies vs. Illinois Fighting Illini: Live Stream or on TV

The No. 1 seed UConn Huskies (34-3) will take on the No. 3 seed Illinois Fighting Illini (29-8) in the NCAA Tournament Elite Eight on Saturday at TD Garden, airing on TBS starting at 6:09 PM ET.UConn won its previous...

Alabama vs. Clemson: Start Time, Streaming Live, TV Channel, How to Watch

The No. 6 seed Clemson Tigers (24-11) will take the court for an NCAA Tournament Elite Eight matchup with the No. 4 seed Alabama Crimson Tide (24-11) on Saturday at Crypto.com Arena, airing on TBS beginning at 8:49 PM ET,...

Today’s March Madness Schedule: Updated Bracket, TV Channels for Every Game

We saw some wild games last night as the Sweet 16 started hot as March Madness continues. There are great matchups tonight worth checking out. Take a look at today's March Madness schedule for Friday, March 29. The Sweet 16...

Big Ten Basketball Predictions, Computer Picks and Best Bets | March 29

There is one game on the postseason college basketball schedule on Friday that feature Big Ten squads, and we have best bets recomendations. That matchup is the Gonzaga Bulldogs versus the Purdue Boilermakers.How to Bet on Big Ten Games[lasso ref="draftkings-promo-1"...

more cubs news