Minor League Plans, More Cubs Prospects, Baseball Needs, and Other Cubs Bullets

Social Navigation

Minor League Plans, More Cubs Prospects, Baseball Needs, and Other Cubs Bullets

Chicago Cubs

The Little Boy and I did a boys’ night slumber party in the family room last night, which was a lot of fun and great for our relationship. But sleeping on the couch, whooo baby, that ain’t kind on my back. I better stay in The Wife’s good graces.

•   With the Cubs picking up four new very young, high-upside prospects this week, it becomes all the more compelling to follow the minor league system in 2021. That is to say, I was already bursting at the seams to get some minor league action (1) after a lost season, and (2) given the specific investments the Cubs have made in player development. But now, I mean, nearly the entire Yu Darvish trade return is riding on the Cubs’ ability to max out some new toolsy, projectable teenage prospects. I really want to see them in action in 2021.

•   To that end, not only has every presumption coming from baseball executives been that, yes, there WILL be a minor league season in 2021, Todd Johnson at Cubs Insider hears more specifics. The working plan – subject to the MLB negotiations and the pandemic, of course – would have the minor league season not kicking off until mid-May, which would allow a separation in big league and minor league Spring Training for safety purposes. The full season would be reduced in length to something like 120 to 130 games, which, hey, you’ll take it. Again, that could be adjusted if the big league season winds up getting adjusted – i.e., if big league Spring Training gets pushed back, as it might – but we’ll cross that bridge when it comes. For now, I’m just happy there’s more confirmation that the full and complete expectation is there will be minor league seasons for the Cubs’ farm system.

•   Speaking of new Cubs prospects Yeison Santana, Reggie Preciado, Ismael Mena, and Owen Caissie, you can read more scouting reports here at Baseball America. It’s funny how they are truly all right there with each other in terms of prospect-dom, as you could make an argument for any of the four as the best of the group (Santana is the most advanced, Preciado has the most upside, Mena got the biggest signing bonus, and Caissie has the most power). I can’t say it enough: these are very good prospects. Happy to have them in the system. Any could become a stud. That wasn’t ever the issue – it’s just that all are so raw and so far away that there’s soooo much more risk than you’d expect from the key prospects in a Yu Darvish trade.

•   Relatedly, the Cubs are at least super stacked in one area now:

•   You might have to click through to see the whole message, but new Cubs prospect Owen Caissie sure is already doing his part to become beloved (with a reminder that he just turned 18 in July):

•   As Michael noted last night, in the big trade, the Cubs covered the $3 million in salary escalation Yu Darvish got thanks to his second place Cy Young finish. As a whatever-aside-kinda-thing: the Cubs kicking in a little cash in the trade means they paid money to get slightly more in return, which is what we WANT to see, if that kind of trade is going to happen. So the cash thing – it’s a good thing, relatively speaking. We can still beef about the return all we want, but it would’ve been even less if they’d made the Padres take the whole contract. So. Oof/good?

•   This gets so very complicated when you start drilling down, and it’s going to merit a lot of discourse over the coming year:

•   Bryan is not wrong about this, especially given how things played out for the Cubs. But the flip side is that, maybe those types of deals aren’t just blanket bad, maybe you simple need to do better at identifying the right free agents:

•   muh heart:

Author: Brett Taylor

Brett Taylor is the Editor and Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and @Brett_A_Taylor.