A disappointing conclusion to an odd DFA decision, as the Cubs DID find a trade partner for relief prospect Michael Arias, but the return is effectively nothing. Just like with Miles Mastrobuoni, the Cubs got cash considerations for Arias.
That means Arias was going to be claimed on waivers – because he obviously was – and the Yankees paid some extra amount to jump to the front of the line. It’s usually not, uh, org-changing money.
The hope had been that the Cubs could at least get a lower-level prospect or IFA pool space for Arias (which they could then turn into a new signee), given that he’s still regarded as a legit relief prospect, albeit one with a lot of control issues to sort out. He has options remaining, a high-90s fastball, and an outstanding changeup. I was at peace with the DFA to clear a 40-man spot (for Colin Rea) when I thought the Cubs may have had a specific trade in mind, but now that we know it’s just for some small amount of cash? I don’t like it one bit.
Here’s where I allow for the rejoinder that yes, the Cubs have a lot of crowding on the 40-man with similar-tiered pitchers, and yes, the Cubs still have additions to make, and yes, some guys are gonna get bounced from the 40-man. I just don’t know that Arias was the right first guy to get bounced if there wasn’t some meaningful trade return coming back.