REPORT: The Cleveland Indians Have Decided to Change Their Name

Social Navigation

REPORT: The Cleveland Indians Have Decided to Change Their Name

Chicago Cubs

Over the summer, with large groups of Americans reconsidering the things they’ve seen, said, believed, and (mis)understood, it was very logical – and extremely appropriate – that the then-Washington Redskins would face public pressure to finally change their racist name, a change that came as soon as pressure from sponsors and partners got firm enough.

Now, the Cleveland Indians, who’ve been privately considering a name change for a little while now, have reportedly decided it’s time:

It’s not certain what the name change timeline will look like, as it might play out over the course of a year+. But multiple sources tell the New York Times that the decision has been made, and change is coming. More details could be provided this week on next steps.

Previously, Cleveland confirmed to The Athletic that this was being discussed at an organizational level back in July. Here’s what we wrote then:

The “Indians,” named after the misnomer of Native Americans, told The Athletic that they “have had ongoing discussions organizationally on these issues. The recent unrest in our community and our country has only underscored the need for us to keep improving as an organization on issues of social justice. With that in mind, we are committed to engaging our community and appropriate stakeholders to determine the best path forward with regard to our team name.”

Cleveland finally started phasing out its racist “Chief Wahoo” caricature in recent years, but it remains to be seen just how seriously they will consider a name change. For the first time in my life, though, it sounds like it actually is under serious consideration, and I do think it is at least worth that consideration.

Admittedly, for a long time, I had no issue with “Indians” as a mascot, because I told myself that we had long passed the point where anyone even thinks of it as any kind of derogatory label. Sure, it’s the wrong name for a group of people whose land was taken from them (while many of them were killed in the process), but it’s just a baseball team. It references a group of people – not explicitly in a derogatory way – and nobody means anything bad by it. That’s how I used to think about it.

Over the last decade, though, my thinking has changed to being much more mixed. Even if you could convince me that it isn’t, on some level, derogatory to use a historically harmed group of people as the mascot for a sports team, you couldn’t convince me that it isn’t just really, really stupid to have a team named after a ridiculous misnomer like Christopher Columbus thinking he’d landed in India when he was really in the Americas. It’s just stupid. Historical? Yes. But just because something has been around a long time doesn’t mean it isn’t absurd.

But, yeah, I also think it’s belittling in a way I am not the best at articulating, and I would defer to listening to Native American groups on that front. Gut says it’s a stupid name at this point and is also probably inappropriate, but I think I probably still need some educating on this one to have a really FIRM position.

I hope this proceeds as a useful conversation, where those who might be impacted (whether in an immediate way or in a long-term, societal way) can be heard. I’m not naive enough to say that this is an easy topic, and I also know that it’s going to lead to questions about the Braves or the Blackhawks or the Illini. Still, this is a worthy conversation.

We’ll see where this all lands (the Cleveland Spiders is right there for the taking). But whatever happens, nothing will change the fact that the Chicago Cubs beat the Cleveland Baseball Team in the 2016 World Series after falling behind 3-1.

Author: Brett Taylor

Brett Taylor is the Editor and Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and @Brett_A_Taylor.