The Early Injuries in Spring Training Could Be Significant, DH Jokes, Dubious Math, and Other Cubs Bullets

Social Navigation

The Early Injuries in Spring Training Could Be Significant, DH Jokes, Dubious Math, and Other Cubs Bullets

Chicago Cubs

Appreciate you indulging the reminders: the Super Bowl is Sunday, which means some of the best sports betting promos of the year are dropping this weekend. So, if you’re into it and want free bets/matching deposits/huge odds boosts/etc., check out the full slate of promos here.

•   With the lockout lasting as long as it has, and with contact cut off between teams and players, we’ve talked about the challenges that creates for conditioning and rehab. But something I hadn’t quite thought about is something that happens every Spring Training and could be even worse this year: the immediate surprise injury. Humans are not binary sets of 1s and 0s, and so “injuries” are sometimes just things that feel a little off when you’re throwing the ball in January. It isn’t until you actually start to ramp up in Spring Training that the issue becomes more clear or more severe. No one expected it, no one predicted it, and boom, a guy is lost for the season right when Spring Training starts. It already happens every normal year.

•   With guys working on their own all offseason, and without any communication with the teams, you just wonder if there’s going to be even more situations where guys got “off” at some point, and then they show up and it goes sideways. Or maybe some guys know they got kinda injured – something that in years past would’ve been raised and addressed in the offseason – but it won’t even come up until they first show up for Spring Training. It could be a ton of injuries showing up in the first week of Spring Training this year (to say nothing of the injuries that come later because of an abbreviated spring).

•   And there’s more to consider on this front, from Ken Rosenthal and Jayson Stark:

So how many players have had to seek out treatments and rehab programs on their own? How many players will feel the effects of what one club official described as “inconsistent, unmonitored” offseason conditioning routines?

“The first thing (I worry about),” said another club official, “are unknown injuries walking into camp because we haven’t been able to talk to players — or potentially worse, players who are concerned about disclosing injuries when they walk into camp, try to play through it and make it worse.”

And what if that guy trying to play hurt is a player who had to sign a minor-league contract and now thinks he has to hit .600 just to make the team? What if he’s a player who is headed for an arbitration hearing where his 2022 health isn’t supposed to be admissible — but he just hobbled into the hearing room on crutches, a sight not even the most impartial arbitrator could pretend not to see?

Or what if we’re talking about a big-name free agent coming off an injury — someone like Clayton Kershaw, for example?

Suppose the Dodgers sign him. Suppose they then lose out on another free-agent starter who didn’t like the odds of beating out Kershaw for a rotation spot. Then suppose, halfway through camp, they realize he isn’t as healthy as they hope. The reverberations of every significant injury, in a spring like this, will be massive.

•   With Rob Manfred’s confirmation that the owner offers have included the universal designated hitter, and with an understanding that obviously the players want it, too, we can safely assume now that it’s definitely coming. I mean, we already assumed it, but now it’s been publicly confirmed. Earlier thoughts here on how the Cubs’ DH situation is perceived, if you missed it.

•   JD has jokes:

•   Marcus Stroman is fine with giving up hitting, but he does have one feather in his cap:

•   He’ll still be available for other duties (I would add back-up shortstop to the list):

•   A whole lotta folks dug into the math on Rob Manfred’s dubious claim that an investment banker informed the owners that it was more lucrative to invest in the stock market than to buy an MLB team over the years (I just rolled my eyes because it was obviously fudged, but it ticked a lot of other people off). It was just a silly thing to claim, even if there’s a version of reality where you can put numbers together and make it true. External studying suggests, no, no, it’s been quite a bit better to own an MLB team:

•   When you factor in the dominant 2020 and most of 2019, and then the return in trade, I think you have to say the signing was a success:

•   MLB’s executive council – a group of eight owners who are kind of like the primary layer of decision makers for “the owners” – has changed a bit, with D-Backs owner Ken Kendrick and Mariners owner John Stanton joining the group, and White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf and Brewers owner Mark Attanasio rolling off (ESPN). The other six owners represented on the council: Red Sox, Dodgers, Tigers, Phillies, Rockies, and Royals.

•   I love this so much, both because I CANNOT WAIT for ‘Better Call Saul’ to return (in April), and because of the hat:

•   Making an impact:

•   It’s pretty hard to have one worse than Grayson Allen against the Bulls, but this is it:

•   This is some serious BS:

•   It’s still pretty unclear what’s going to happen with Marc-André Fleury:

•   I am very excited for this one, because I am a dork:

Latest from Bleacher Nation:

Author: Brett Taylor

Brett Taylor is the Editor and Lead Cubs Writer at Bleacher Nation, and you can find him on Twitter at @BleacherNation and @Brett_A_Taylor.